222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22353456)
1. Comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and mepivacaine in pediatric patients: a randomized, double-blind study.
Odabaş ME; Cınar C; Deveci C; Alaçam A
Pediatr Dent; 2012; 34(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 22353456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Articaine and mepivacaine efficacy in postoperative analgesia for lower third molar removal: a double-blind, randomized, crossover study.
Colombini BL; Modena KC; Calvo AM; Sakai VT; Giglio FP; Dionísio TJ; Trindade AS; Lauris JR; Santos CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):169-74. PubMed ID: 16876058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical efficacy of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and articaine for local infiltration.
Srisurang S; Narit L; Prisana P
J Investig Clin Dent; 2011 Feb; 2(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 25427324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Berlin J; Nusstein J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver J
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Mar; 99(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 15716846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 0.5% bupivacaine (both with 1:200,000 epinephrine) for lower third molar removal.
Gregorio LV; Giglio FP; Sakai VT; Modena KC; Colombini BL; Calvo AM; Sipert CR; Dionísio TJ; Lauris JR; Faria FA; Trindade Junior AS; Santos CF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 18420431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of injection pain, heart rate increase, and postinjection pain of articaine and lidocaine in a primary intraligamentary injection administered with a computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery system.
Nusstein J; Berlin J; Reader A; Beck M; Weaver JM
Anesth Prog; 2004; 51(4):126-33. PubMed ID: 15675261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of articaine 4% and lidocaine 2% in paediatric dental patients.
Ram D; Amir E
Int J Paediatr Dent; 2006 Jul; 16(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 16759322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The cardiovascular effect of local anesthesia with articaine plus 1:200,000 adrenalin versus lidocaine plus 1:100,000 adrenalin in medically compromised cardiac patients: a prospective, randomized, double blinded study.
Elad S; Admon D; Kedmi M; Naveh E; Benzki E; Ayalon S; Tuchband A; Lutan H; Kaufman E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jun; 105(6):725-30. PubMed ID: 18485309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison between articaine HCl and lidocaine HCl in pediatric dental patients.
Malamed SF; Gagnon S; Leblanc D
Pediatr Dent; 2000; 22(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 10969438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine and 2% lidocaine for maxillary buccal infiltration in patients with irreversible pulpitis.
Srinivasan N; Kavitha M; Loganathan CS; Padmini G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jan; 107(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 19101495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of the anesthetic effect of epinephrine-free articaine and mepivacaine through quantitative sensory testing.
Said Yekta-Michael S; Stein JM; Marioth-Wirtz E
Head Face Med; 2015 Feb; 11():2. PubMed ID: 25889698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of ropivacaine and articaine with epinephrine for infiltration anaesthesia in dentistry - a randomized study.
Krzemiński TF; Gilowski L; Wiench R; Płocica I; Kondzielnik P; Sielańczyk A
Int Endod J; 2011 Aug; 44(8):746-51. PubMed ID: 21470248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine for incisive/mental nerve block.
Batista da Silva C; Berto LA; Volpato MC; Ramacciato JC; Motta RH; Ranali J; Groppo FC
J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):438-41. PubMed ID: 20171359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine and 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine when used as a supplemental anesthetic.
Rosenberg PA; Amin KG; Zibari Y; Lin LM
J Endod; 2007 Apr; 33(4):403-5. PubMed ID: 17368327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A prospective, randomized, double-blind comparison of articaine and lidocaine for maxillary infiltrations.
Evans G; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):389-93. PubMed ID: 18358883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Hemostatic and anesthetic efficacy of 4% articaine HCl with 1:200,000 epinephrine and 4% articaine HCl with 1:100,000 epinephrine when administered intraorally for periodontal surgery.
Moore PA; Doll B; Delie RA; Hersh EV; Korostoff J; Johnson S; Goodson JM; Halem S; Palys M; Leonel JS; Kozlowski VA; Peterson C; Hutcheson M
J Periodontol; 2007 Feb; 78(2):247-53. PubMed ID: 17274713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Onset and duration periods of articaine and lidocaine on maxillary infiltration.
Costa CG; Tortamano IP; Rocha RG; Francischone CE; Tortamano N
Quintessence Int; 2005 Mar; 36(3):197-201. PubMed ID: 15887505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Injection pain of prilocaine plain, mepivacaine plain, articaine with epinephrine, and lidocaine with epinephrine.
Wahl MJ; Schmitt MM; Overton DA
Gen Dent; 2006; 54(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 16776407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anesthetic efficacy of 4% Articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine versus 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine as a primary buccal infiltration in the mandibular first molar.
McEntire M; Nusstein J; Drum M; Reader A; Beck M
J Endod; 2011 Apr; 37(4):450-4. PubMed ID: 21419288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessing the pain reaction of children receiving periodontal ligament anesthesia using a computerized device (Wand).
Ran D; Peretz B
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2003; 27(3):247-50. PubMed ID: 12739685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
