244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22353603)
1. Adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions: a systematic review.
Chee B; Rickman LJ; Satterthwaite JD
J Dent; 2012 Jun; 40(6):443-52. PubMed ID: 22353603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of adhesive strategy on clinical parameters in cervical restorations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schroeder M; Correa IC; Bauer J; Loguercio AD; Reis A
J Dent; 2017 Jul; 62():36-53. PubMed ID: 28495559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 3-year clinical effectiveness of one-step adhesives in non-carious cervical lesions.
Moretto SG; Russo EM; Carvalho RC; De Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Cardoso MV
J Dent; 2013 Aug; 41(8):675-82. PubMed ID: 23747824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two-year clinical trial of a universal adhesive in total-etch and self-etch mode in non-carious cervical lesions.
Lawson NC; Robles A; Fu CC; Lin CP; Sawlani K; Burgess JO
J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1229-34. PubMed ID: 26231300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-year clinical performance of a HEMA-free one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis B; Van Meerbeek B
Eur J Oral Sci; 2011 Dec; 119(6):511-6. PubMed ID: 22112039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A randomized controlled clinical trial of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 1 year.
Van Landuyt KL; Peumans M; Fieuws S; De Munck J; Cardoso MV; Ermis RB; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
J Dent; 2008 Oct; 36(10):847-55. PubMed ID: 18656295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-year clinical effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive in cervical lesions.
Peumans M; Munck J; Van Landuyt K; Lambrechts P; Van Meerbeek B
Eur J Oral Sci; 2005 Dec; 113(6):512-8. PubMed ID: 16324142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An 18-months' evaluation of self-etch and etch & rinse adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions.
Dalton Bittencourt D; Ezecelevski IG; Reis A; Van Dijken JW; Loguercio AD
Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Jun; 63(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 16191912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets.
Oginni AO; Adeleke AA
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions. A systematic review.
Peumans M; De Munck J; Mine A; Van Meerbeek B
Dent Mater; 2014 Oct; 30(10):1089-103. PubMed ID: 25091726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical effectiveness of a one-step self-etch adhesive in non-carious cervical lesions at 2 years.
Ermis RB; Van Landuyt KL; Cardoso MV; De Munck J; Van Meerbeek B; Peumans M
Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):889-97. PubMed ID: 21603966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical long-term retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems in non-carious cervical lesions. A 13 years evaluation.
van Dijken JW; Sunnegårdh-Grönberg K; Lindberg A
Dent Mater; 2007 Sep; 23(9):1101-7. PubMed ID: 17113139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. One-year clinical evaluation of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without additional enamel etching technique in cervical lesions.
Ozel E; Say EC; Yurdaguven H; Soyman M
Aust Dent J; 2010 Jun; 55(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 20604757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A new universal simplified adhesive: 6-month clinical evaluation.
Mena-Serrano A; Kose C; De Paula EA; Tay LY; Reis A; Loguercio AD; Perdigão J
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2013 Feb; 25(1):55-69. PubMed ID: 23374411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. One-year evaluation of a simplified ethanol-wet bonding technique: a randomized clinical trial.
Araújo JF; Barros TA; Braga EM; Loretto SC; Silva e Souza Pde A; Silva e Souza MH
Braz Dent J; 2013; 24(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 23969918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The clinical effectiveness of various adhesive systems: an 18-month evaluation.
Moosavi H; Kimyai S; Forghani M; Khodadadi R
Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):134-41. PubMed ID: 22917442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term dentin retention of etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives and a resin-modified glass ionomer cement in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW; Pallesen U
Dent Mater; 2008 Jul; 24(7):915-22. PubMed ID: 18155288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective 8-year evaluation of a mild two-step self-etching adhesive and a heavily filled two-step etch-and-rinse system in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2010 Sep; 26(9):940-6. PubMed ID: 20646753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of operator experience on non-carious cervical lesion restorations: Clinical evaluation with different adhesive systems.
Scotti N; Comba A; Gambino A; Manzon E; Breschi L; Paolino D; Pasqualini D; Berutti E
Am J Dent; 2016 Feb; 29(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 27093774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized controlled 5-year prospective study of two HEMA-free adhesives, a 1-step self etching and a 3-step etch-and-rinse, in non-carious cervical lesions.
van Dijken JW
Dent Mater; 2013 Nov; 29(11):e271-80. PubMed ID: 24001950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
