82 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22353674)
1. Fitting a lognormal distribution to enumeration and absence/presence data.
Commeau N; Parent E; Delignette-Muller ML; Cornu M
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Apr; 155(3):146-52. PubMed ID: 22353674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fitting a distribution to microbial counts: making sense of zeroes.
Duarte AS; Stockmarr A; Nauta MJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Mar; 196():40-50. PubMed ID: 25522056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impact of microbial count distributions on human health risk estimates.
Duarte AS; Nauta MJ
Int J Food Microbiol; 2015 Feb; 195():48-57. PubMed ID: 25506750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modelling homogeneous and heterogeneous microbial contaminations in a powdered food product.
Jongenburger I; Reij MW; Boer EP; Zwietering MH; Gorris LG
Int J Food Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 157(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 22591548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of two-component mixtures of lognormal distributions in grouped, doubly truncated data: analysis of red blood cell volume distributions.
McLaren CE; Wagstaff M; Brittenham GM; Jacobs A
Biometrics; 1991 Jun; 47(2):607-22. PubMed ID: 1912264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A stable linear algorithm for fitting the lognormal model to survival data.
Gamel JW; Greenberg RA; McLean IW
Comput Biomed Res; 1988 Feb; 21(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 3345651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maximum likelihood estimates of mean and variance of occupation radiation doses subjected to minimum detection levels.
Datta D; Singh S; Johnson BE; Kushwaha HS
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(4):411-8. PubMed ID: 18083720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Confidence limits for lognormal percentiles and for lognormal mean based on samples with multiple detection limits.
Krishnamoorthy K; Xu Z
Ann Occup Hyg; 2011 Jun; 55(5):495-509. PubMed ID: 21610082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of different sampling techniques and enumeration methods for the isolation and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in raw retail chicken legs.
Scherer K; Bartelt E; Sommerfeld C; Hildebrandt G
Int J Food Microbiol; 2006 Apr; 108(1):115-9. PubMed ID: 16545475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differences in Gaussian diffusion tensor imaging and non-Gaussian diffusion kurtosis imaging model-based estimates of diffusion tensor invariants in the human brain.
Lanzafame S; Giannelli M; Garaci F; Floris R; Duggento A; Guerrisi M; Toschi N
Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2464. PubMed ID: 27147357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Quantification of variability and uncertainty for censored data sets and application to air toxic emission factors.
Zhao Y; Frey HC
Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):1019-34. PubMed ID: 15357825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An accurate substitution method for analyzing censored data.
Ganser GH; Hewett P
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2010 Apr; 7(4):233-44. PubMed ID: 20169489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multivariate mixtures of Erlangs for density estimation under censoring.
Verbelen R; Antonio K; Claeskens G
Lifetime Data Anal; 2016 Jul; 22(3):429-55. PubMed ID: 26340888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Lessons from the organization of a proficiency testing program in food microbiology by interlaboratory comparison: analytical methods in use, impact of methods on bacterial counts and measurement uncertainty of bacterial counts.
Augustin JC; Carlier V
Food Microbiol; 2006 Feb; 23(1):1-38. PubMed ID: 16942983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An Expectation Maximization algorithm for fitting the generalized odds-rate model to interval censored data.
Zhou J; Zhang J; Lu W
Stat Med; 2017 Mar; 36(7):1157-1171. PubMed ID: 28004414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Microbial-Maximum Likelihood Estimation Tool for Microbial Quantification in Food From Left-Censored Data Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Microbial Risk Assessment.
Bahk GJ; Lee HJ
Front Microbiol; 2021; 12():730733. PubMed ID: 35002994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Estimation method for serial dilution experiments.
Ben-David A; Davidson CE
J Microbiol Methods; 2014 Dec; 107():214-21. PubMed ID: 25205541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Comparison of direct colony count methods and the MPN-method for quantitative detection of Listeria in model and field conditions].
Hildebrandt G; Schott W
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2001; 114(11-12):453-64. PubMed ID: 11766274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of several methods for analyzing censored data.
Hewett P; Ganser GH
Ann Occup Hyg; 2007 Oct; 51(7):611-32. PubMed ID: 17940277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
