These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22353913)

  • 21. Evaluation of posttreatment changes in Class II Division 1 patients after nonextraction orthodontic treatment: cephalometric and model analysis.
    Ciger S; Aksu M; Germeç D
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 15750542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Tooth movement in class II division 1 malocclusion after premolar extraction].
    Meng Y; Kang YL; Liu M; Liu J; Bai D
    Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2011 Nov; 42(6):838-41. PubMed ID: 22332555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of orthodontic treatment on mandibular rotation and displacement in Angle Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Phan XL; Schneider BJ; Sadowsky C; BeGole EA
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 15132443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
    LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Skeletal and dentoalveolar effects of Twin-block and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion: a comparative study.
    Jena AK; Duggal R; Parkash H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Nov; 130(5):594-602. PubMed ID: 17110256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
    Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Orthodontics in general dental practice 6. Treatment of Angle Class II/1 malocclusions].
    Daems J; Gerits A; Carels CE
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2008 Aug; 115(8):411-8. PubMed ID: 18751480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Soft tissue, skeletal and dentoalveolar changes following conventional anchorage molar distalization therapy in class II non-growing subjects: a multicentric retrospective study.
    Fontana M; Cozzani M; Caprioglio A
    Prog Orthod; 2012 May; 13(1):30-41. PubMed ID: 22583585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Occlusal plane canting reduction accompanies mandibular counterclockwise rotation in camouflaging treatment of hyperdivergent skeletal Class II malocclusion.
    Ye R; Li Y; Li X; Li J; Wang J; Zhao S; Zhao Z
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Sep; 83(5):758-65. PubMed ID: 23473541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of patient age and sex on treatment: correction of Class II malocclusion with the Begg technique.
    Harris EF
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Dec; 71(6):433-41. PubMed ID: 11771781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A cephalometric study of class II Division 1 malocclusions treated with the Jasper Jumper appliance.
    Covell DA; Trammell DW; Boero RP; West R
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):311-20. PubMed ID: 10456598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparative evaluation of micro-implant and headgear anchorage used with a pre-adjusted appliance system.
    Ma J; Wang L; Zhang W; Chen W; Zhao C; Smales RJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Jun; 30(3):283-7. PubMed ID: 18540016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
    Purkayastha SK; Rabie AB; Wong R
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(3):233-43. PubMed ID: 18834006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Herbst appliance treatment of Class II, division 2 malocclusions.
    Obijou C; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Sep; 112(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 9294358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Choice of treatment strategy in patients with distal occlusion of Division I, Class II].
    Kolganova SI
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 2005; 84(4):51-6. PubMed ID: 16091709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Uprighting the mandibular molars stimulates mandibular growth during treatment of class II malocclusion.
    Miyajima K; Yoshimoto J; Murata S; Kanomi R
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1997; 64(5):340-3. PubMed ID: 9391711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Age effects on orthodontic treatment: adolescents contrasted with adults.
    Dyer GS; Harris EF; Vaden JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):523-30. PubMed ID: 1962605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with severe overbite: cephalometric evaluation of the effects of orthodontic treatment.
    Marques LS; Ramos-Jorge ML; Araujo MT; Bolognese AM
    World J Orthod; 2008; 9(4):319-28. PubMed ID: 19146013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Forsus Nitinol Flat Spring and Jasper Jumper corrections of Class II division 1 malocclusions.
    Karacay S; Akin E; Olmez H; Gurton AU; Sagdic D
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):666-72. PubMed ID: 16808575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Class II Division 1 malocclusion with a high mandibular plane angle corrected with 2-phase treatment.
    Kurosawa M; Ando K; Goto S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):241-51. PubMed ID: 19201332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.