222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22354174)
1. Influence of corneal thickness changes during active uveitis on Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry.
Heinz C; Taneri S; Roesel M; Heiligenhaus A
Ophthalmic Res; 2012; 48(1):38-42. PubMed ID: 22354174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry in deep lamellar and penetrating keratoplasties.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Am J Ophthalmol; 2008 Feb; 145(2):215-221. PubMed ID: 18222191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Kotecha A; White ET; Shewry JM; Garway-Heath DF
Br J Ophthalmol; 2005 Dec; 89(12):1572-5. PubMed ID: 16299132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in healthy and glaucomatous eyes.
Ceruti P; Morbio R; Marraffa M; Marchini G
Eye (Lond); 2009 Feb; 23(2):262-9. PubMed ID: 18219335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis on tonometry as measured by dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Goldmann tonometry in glaucomatous eyes.
Hager A; Loge K; Schroeder B; Füllhas MO; Wiegand W
J Glaucoma; 2008 Aug; 17(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 18703945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and intraocular pressure level on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry.
Francis BA; Hsieh A; Lai MY; Chopra V; Pena F; Azen S; Varma R;
Ophthalmology; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-6. PubMed ID: 17070592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in keratoconus.
Unterlauft JD; Schädle N; Kasper K; Klink T; Geerling G
Cornea; 2011 Oct; 30(10):1078-82. PubMed ID: 21716097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between diurnal variations in intraocular pressure measurements and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
Kotecha A; Crabb DP; Spratt A; Garway-Heath DF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Sep; 50(9):4229-36. PubMed ID: 19407025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with goldmann applanation tonometry.
Kaufmann C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2004 Sep; 45(9):3118-21. PubMed ID: 15326129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry following Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK).
Bochmann F; Kaufmann C; Becht C; Bachmann LM; Thiel MA
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2009 Apr; 226(4):241-4. PubMed ID: 19384775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of dynamic contour tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry in glaucoma practice.
Halkiadakis I; Patsea E; Chatzimichali K; Skouriotis S; Chalkidou S; Amariotakis G; Papakonstadinou D; Theodossiadis G; Amariotakis A; Georgopoulos G
Acta Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 87(3):323-8. PubMed ID: 18631335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of factors affecting the difference in intraocular pressure measurements between dynamic contour tonometry and goldmann applanation tonometry.
Wang J; Cayer MM; Descovich D; Kamdeu-Fansi A; Harasymowycz PJ; Li G; Lesk MR
J Glaucoma; 2011 Oct; 20(8):482-7. PubMed ID: 21048515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparisons between Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the TonoPen, and Goldmann applanation tonometry in patients with glaucoma.
Salvetat ML; Zeppieri M; Tosoni C; Brusini P
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2007 May; 85(3):272-9. PubMed ID: 17488456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of thin, thick, and normal corneas on Goldmann intraocular pressure measurements and correction formulae in individual eyes.
Park SJ; Ang GS; Nicholas S; Wells AP
Ophthalmology; 2012 Mar; 119(3):443-9. PubMed ID: 22035576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of central corneal thickness on dynamic contour tonometry and Goldmann applanation tonometry in primary open-angle glaucoma.
Grieshaber MC; Schoetzau A; Zawinka C; Flammer J; Orgul S
Arch Ophthalmol; 2007 Jun; 125(6):740-4. PubMed ID: 17562982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Corneal parameters and difference between goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in normal eyes.
Lanza M; Borrelli M; De Bernardo M; Filosa ML; Rosa N
J Glaucoma; 2008 Sep; 17(6):460-4. PubMed ID: 18794680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The influence of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature radius on the intraocular pressure as measured by different tonometers: noncontact and goldmann applanation tonometers.
Harada Y; Hirose N; Kubota T; Tawara A
J Glaucoma; 2008 Dec; 17(8):619-25. PubMed ID: 19092456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Goldmann applanation and dynamic contour tonometry before and after cataract surgery.
Heinrich MA; Eppig T; Langenbucher A; Walter S; Behrens-Baumann W; Viestenz A
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):683-9. PubMed ID: 22365580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Rebound, applanation, and dynamic contour tonometry in pathologic corneas.
Rosentreter A; Athanasopoulos A; Schild AM; Lappas A; Cursiefen C; Dietlein TS
Cornea; 2013 Mar; 32(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 22673854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry: Difference of Intraocular Pressure Values Between Eyes with and without Glaucomatous Damage in Thin Corneas].
Umurhan Akkan JC; Akkan F; Sezgin Akcay BI; Ayintap E; Tuncer K
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2015 Oct; 232(10):1190-7. PubMed ID: 26512850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
