These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2235476)

  • 1. [Statistical analysis of 2 x 2 tables:I. Controlled clinical studies].
    Sørensen HT; Møller-Petersen J; Rosthøj S; Olesen F; Rasmussen SN
    Nord Med; 1990; 105(10):272-4. PubMed ID: 2235476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Count on your beliefs. Bayes--not the P value--measures credence].
    Taube A; Malmquist J
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jul; 98(28-29):3208-11. PubMed ID: 11496808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistics and the relationship of clinical research to clinical practice.
    Khuder SA; Kahaleh B
    J Rheumatol; 2009 Feb; 36(2):219-20. PubMed ID: 19208555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating statistics in clinical trials: making the unintelligible intelligible.
    Gilmore SJ
    Australas J Dermatol; 2008 Nov; 49(4):177-84; quiz 185-6. PubMed ID: 18855776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the relationship between dependence tree classification error and Bayes error rate.
    Balagani KS; Phoha VV
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2007 Oct; 29(10):1866-8. PubMed ID: 17699930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extracting a maximum of useful information from statistical research data.
    Sohlberg S; Andersson G
    Scand J Psychol; 2005 Feb; 46(1):69-77. PubMed ID: 15660635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bridging the gap between statistical analysis and decision making in public health research.
    Stangl DK
    Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 15678414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Nonparametric empirical Bayes method for comparison of treatment effects with application to stress urinary incontinence data.
    Liu C; Shen W; Xie J
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17311241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bayesian analysis of crossclassified spatial data with autocorrelation.
    Sun L; Clayton MK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):74-84. PubMed ID: 17680834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Randomized clinical trials in implant therapy: relationships among methodological, statistical, clinical, paratextual features and number of citations.
    Nieri M; Clauser C; Franceschi D; Pagliaro U; Saletta D; Pini-Prato G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Aug; 18(4):419-31. PubMed ID: 17517060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Paradigms and pragmatism].
    Healy MJ
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):185-9. PubMed ID: 10367305
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The theorem of Bayes as a clinical research tool.
    Edwards FH; Graeber GM
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1987 Aug; 165(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 3299820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Statistical methods in cancer research. Volume IV. Descriptive epidemiology.
    Estève J; Benhamou E; Raymond L
    IARC Sci Publ; 1994; (128):1-302. PubMed ID: 7698823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Further statistics in dentistry. Part 9: Bayesian statistics.
    Petrie A; Bulman JS; Osborn JF
    Br Dent J; 2003 Feb; 194(3):129-34. PubMed ID: 12598879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comments on 'trying to be precise about vagueness' by Stephen Senn, Statistics in Medicine 2007; 26:1417-1430.
    Lambert PC; Sutton AJ; Burton PR; Abrams KR; Jones DR
    Stat Med; 2008 Feb; 27(4):619-22, author reply 622-4. PubMed ID: 17847156
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical epidemiology and individualized medicine.
    Henderson R; Schumacher M
    Biom J; 2011 Mar; 53(2):167-9. PubMed ID: 21312221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Literature review: January-March 2008.
    Patterson SD; Carroll K
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(2):147-9. PubMed ID: 18428118
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian interim analysis in clinical trials.
    Zhang X; Cutter G
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Sep; 29(5):751-5. PubMed ID: 18589003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the logic in mixing data and beliefs?
    Brown PM
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 17256805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.