These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22356174)

  • 1. False-belief understanding in 2.5-year-olds: evidence from two novel verbal spontaneous-response tasks.
    Scott RM; He Z; Baillargeon R; Cummins D
    Dev Sci; 2012 Mar; 15(2):181-93. PubMed ID: 22356174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Processing Demands Impact 3-Year-Olds' Performance in a Spontaneous-Response Task: New Evidence for the Processing-Load Account of Early False-Belief Understanding.
    Scott RM; Roby E
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142405. PubMed ID: 26562840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 2.5-year-olds succeed at a verbal anticipatory-looking false-belief task.
    He Z; Bolz M; Baillargeon R
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):14-29. PubMed ID: 22429030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Two-and-a-half-year-olds succeed at a traditional false-belief task with reduced processing demands.
    Setoh P; Scott RM; Baillargeon R
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2016 Nov; 113(47):13360-13365. PubMed ID: 27821728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. 2.5-year-olds succeed in identity and location elicited-response false-belief tasks with adequate response practice.
    Scott RM; Roby E; Setoh P
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Oct; 198():104890. PubMed ID: 32653728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The relationship between parental mental-state language and 2.5-year-olds' performance on a nontraditional false-belief task.
    Roby E; Scott RM
    Cognition; 2018 Nov; 180():10-23. PubMed ID: 29981965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. False-belief understanding i 2.5-year-olds: evidence for violation-of-expectation change-of-location and unexpected-contents tasks.
    He Z; Bolz M; Baillargeon R
    Dev Sci; 2011 Mar; 14(2):292-305. PubMed ID: 22213902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implicit and explicit false belief development in preschool children.
    Grosse Wiesmann C; Friederici AD; Singer T; Steinbeis N
    Dev Sci; 2017 Sep; 20(5):. PubMed ID: 27696613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early conversational environment enables spontaneous belief attribution in deaf children.
    Meristo M; Strid K; Hjelmquist E
    Cognition; 2016 Dec; 157():139-145. PubMed ID: 27636329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Continuity from an implicit to an explicit understanding of false belief from infancy to preschool age.
    Thoermer C; Sodian B; Vuori M; Perst H; Kristen S
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):172-87. PubMed ID: 22429040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptual Access Reasoning (PAR) in Developing a Representational Theory of Mind.
    Fabricius WV; Gonzales CR; Pesch A; Weimer AA; Pugliese J; Carroll K; Bolnick RR; Kupfer AS; Eisenberg N; Spinrad TL
    Monogr Soc Res Child Dev; 2021 Sep; 86(3):7-154. PubMed ID: 34580875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Chinese preschoolers' implicit and explicit false-belief understanding.
    Wang B; Low J; Jing Z; Qinghua Q
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):123-40. PubMed ID: 22429037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Making sense of early false-belief understanding.
    Helming KA; Strickland B; Jacob P
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2014 Apr; 18(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 24612994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eighteen-month-olds understand false beliefs in an unexpected-contents task.
    Buttelmann D; Over H; Carpenter M; Tomasello M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Mar; 119():120-6. PubMed ID: 24267393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Infants' performance in the indirect false belief tasks: A second-person interpretation.
    Barone P; Gomila A
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2021 May; 12(3):e1551. PubMed ID: 33319503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Infants' performance in spontaneous-response false belief tasks: A review and meta-analysis.
    Barone P; Corradi G; Gomila A
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Nov; 57():101350. PubMed ID: 31445431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Deception dissociates from false belief reasoning in deaf children: implications for the implicit versus explicit theory of mind distinction.
    de Villiers PA; de Villiers JG
    Br J Dev Psychol; 2012 Mar; 30(Pt 1):188-209. PubMed ID: 22429041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reliability and generalizability of an acted-out false belief task in 3-year-olds.
    Dörrenberg S; Wenzel L; Proft M; Rakoczy H; Liszkowski U
    Infant Behav Dev; 2019 Feb; 54():13-21. PubMed ID: 30513405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A longitudinal, microgenetic study of the emergence of false belief understanding and inhibition skills.
    Flynn E; O'Malley C; Wood D
    Dev Sci; 2004 Feb; 7(1):103-15. PubMed ID: 15323122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Together I Can! Joint Attention Boosts 3- to 4-Year-Olds' Performance in a Verbal False-Belief Test.
    Psouni E; Falck A; Boström L; Persson M; Sidén L; Wallin M
    Child Dev; 2019 Jan; 90(1):35-50. PubMed ID: 29676448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.