These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22356175)
21. Figural aftereffects in the perception of faces. Webster MA; MacLin OH Psychon Bull Rev; 1999 Dec; 6(4):647-53. PubMed ID: 10682208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects. Rhodes G; Jeffery L; Clifford CW; Leopold DA Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(17):2291-6. PubMed ID: 17619045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The nature of upright and inverted face representations: an adaptation-transfer study of configuration. Pichler P; Dosani M; Oruç I; Barton JJ Cortex; 2012 Jun; 48(6):725-36. PubMed ID: 21396633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The magnetoencephalographic response to upright and inverted face stimuli in a patient with Williams syndrome. Nakamura M; Watanabe S; Gunji A; Kakigi R Pediatr Neurol; 2006 May; 34(5):412-4. PubMed ID: 16648006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fitting the child's mind to the world: adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity in 8-year-olds. Nishimura M; Maurer D; Jeffery L; Pellicano E; Rhodes G Dev Sci; 2008 Jul; 11(4):620-7. PubMed ID: 18576969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. View-contingent aftereffects suggest joint coding of face shape and view. Welling LL; Jones BC; Bestelmeyer PE; DeBruine LM; Little AC; Conway CA Perception; 2009; 38(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 19323142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Interplay between familiarity and orientation in face processing: an ERP study. Marzi T; Viggiano MP Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Sep; 65(3):182-92. PubMed ID: 17512996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Recovery from adaptation to facial identity is larger for upright than inverted faces in the human occipito-temporal cortex. Mazard A; Schiltz C; Rossion B Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(6):912-22. PubMed ID: 16229867 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. The development of spatial frequency biases in face recognition. Leonard HC; Karmiloff-Smith A; Johnson MH J Exp Child Psychol; 2010 Aug; 106(4):193-207. PubMed ID: 20451214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Spatial frequency tuning of upright and inverted face identification. Gaspar C; Sekuler AB; Bennett PJ Vision Res; 2008 Dec; 48(28):2817-26. PubMed ID: 18835403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The face viewpoint aftereffect: adapting to full faces, head outlines, and features. Daar M; Wilson HR Vision Res; 2012 Jan; 53(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 22142786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Leopold DA; O'Toole AJ; Vetter T; Blanz V Nat Neurosci; 2001 Jan; 4(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 11135650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Atypical updating of face representations with experience in children with autism. Ewing L; Pellicano E; Rhodes G Dev Sci; 2013 Jan; 16(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 23278933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Broadly tuned, view-specific coding of face shape: opposing figural aftereffects can be induced in different views. Jeffery L; Rhodes G; Busey T Vision Res; 2007 Nov; 47(24):3070-7. PubMed ID: 17920099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effects of personal familiarity on early neuromagnetic correlates of face perception. Kloth N; Dobel C; Schweinberger SR; Zwitserlood P; Bölte J; Junghöfer M Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Dec; 24(11):3317-21. PubMed ID: 17156392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rapidly acquired shape and face aftereffects are retinotopic and local in origin. Dickinson JE; Mighall HK; Almeida RA; Bell J; Badcock DR Vision Res; 2012 Jul; 65():1-11. PubMed ID: 22683687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Representations of familiar and unfamiliar faces as revealed by viewpoint-aftereffects. Ryu JJ; Chaudhuri A Vision Res; 2006 Nov; 46(23):4059-63. PubMed ID: 16996559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Face recognition memory and configural processing: a developmental ERP study using upright, inverted, and contrast-reversed faces. Itier RJ; Taylor MJ J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Apr; 16(3):487-502. PubMed ID: 15072683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Recognising upright and inverted faces: MEG source localisation. Taylor MJ; Bayless SJ; Mills T; Pang EW Brain Res; 2011 Mar; 1381():167-74. PubMed ID: 21238433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]