198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22356352)
1. A comparison of mammography and ultrasound in women with breast disease: a receiver operating characteristic analysis.
Ying X; Lin Y; Xia X; Hu B; Zhu Z; He P
Breast J; 2012; 18(2):130-8. PubMed ID: 22356352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. To evaluate the role of sonography as an adjunct to mammography in women with dense breasts.
Masroor I; Ahmed MN; Pasha S
J Pak Med Assoc; 2009 May; 59(5):298-301. PubMed ID: 19438134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of diagnostic mammography and breast ultrasound during pregnancy and lactation.
Robbins J; Jeffries D; Roubidoux M; Helvie M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Mar; 196(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 21343518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative analysis of early diagnostic tools for breast cancer].
Shen SJ; Sun Q; Xu YL; Zhou YD; Guan JH; Mao F; Lin Y; Wang XJ; Han SM
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 34(11):877-80. PubMed ID: 23291142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Diagnostic mammography and sonography: concordance of the breast imaging reporting assessments and final clinical outcome].
Lorenzen J; Wedel AK; Lisboa BW; Löning T; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Nov; 177(11):1545-51. PubMed ID: 16302136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of the breast imaging reporting and data system final assessment system in sonography of palpable breast lesions and reconsideration of the modified triple test.
Kwak JY; Kim EK; Park HL; Kim JY; Oh KK
J Ultrasound Med; 2006 Oct; 25(10):1255-61. PubMed ID: 16998097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic accuracy of Tc-99m-MIBI for breast carcinoma in correlation with mammography and sonography.
Habib S; Maseeh-uz-Zaman ; Hameed A; Niaz K; Hashmi H; Kamal S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Oct; 19(10):622-6. PubMed ID: 19811712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Outcome of men presenting with clinical breast problems: the role of mammography and ultrasound.
Patterson SK; Helvie MA; Aziz K; Nees AV
Breast J; 2006; 12(5):418-23. PubMed ID: 16958958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast microcalcifications: mammography versus mammography-sonography combination.
Marini C; Traino C; Cilotti A; Roncella M; Campori G; Bartolozzi C
Radiol Med; 2003; 105(1-2):17-26. PubMed ID: 12700541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of combined BI-RADS assessment using mammography and sonography for evaluation of incidental hypermetabolic lesions in the breast on 18F-FDG PET-CT.
Lim S; Lee EH; Park JM; Chang YW; Kim HH; Jeong SH
Acta Radiol; 2013 Dec; 54(10):1117-24. PubMed ID: 23864064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do mammography, sonography, and MR mammography have a diagnostic benefit compared with mammography and sonography?
Müller-Schimpfle M; Stoll P; Stern W; Kurz S; Dammann F; Claussen CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1323-9. PubMed ID: 9129436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Detection of microcalcifications by high-resolution B-mode sonography in patients with BI-RADS 4a lesions].
Stöblen F; Landt S; Köninger A; Hecktor J; Kimmig R; Kümmel S
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2009; 49(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 20530944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A set of shear wave elastography quantitative parameters combined with ultrasound BI-RADS to assess benign and malignant breast lesions.
Shi XQ; Li JL; Wan WB; Huang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2015 Apr; 41(4):960-6. PubMed ID: 25701532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of ultrasound elastography, mammography, and sonography in the diagnosis of solid breast lesions.
Zhi H; Ou B; Luo BM; Feng X; Wen YL; Yang HY
J Ultrasound Med; 2007 Jun; 26(6):807-15. PubMed ID: 17526612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Electrical impedance scanning in the differentiation of suspicious breast lesions: comparison with mammography, ultrasound and histopathology].
Fuchsjäger MH; Helbich TH; Ringl H; Funovics MA; Rudas M; Riedl C; Pfarl G
Rofo; 2002 Dec; 174(12):1522-9. PubMed ID: 12471524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does adding diffuse optical tomography to sonography improve differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions? Observer performance study.
La Yun B; Kim SM; Jang M; Ahn HS; Lyou CY; Kim MS; Kim SA; Song TK; Yoo Y; Chang JH; Kim Y
J Ultrasound Med; 2015 May; 34(5):749-57. PubMed ID: 25911706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Usefulness of scintimammography as an adjunct to mammography and ultrasound in the diagnosis of breast diseases.
Gupta R; Collier D; Abdeen S; Roberts L; Hussein AY; Al-Bader I; Syed GM
Australas Radiol; 2006 Dec; 50(6):539-42. PubMed ID: 17107524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sonoelastography in the diagnosis of malignant and benign breast lesions: initial clinical experiences.
Hatzung G; Grunwald S; Zygmunt M; Geaid AA; Behrndt PO; Isermann R; Kohlmann T; Ohlinger R
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Dec; 31(6):596-603. PubMed ID: 20614414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differentiating between malignant and benign breast masses: factors limiting sonoelastographic strain ratio.
Stachs A; Hartmann S; Stubert J; Dieterich M; Martin A; Kundt G; Reimer T; Gerber B
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Apr; 34(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 23108926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prediction of the usefulness of combined mammography and scintimammography in suspected primary breast cancer using ROC curves.
Buscombe JR; Cwikla JB; Holloway B; Hilson AJ
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jan; 42(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 11197976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
