248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22357016)
1. Validation of three virtual reality Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) modules.
Pitzul KB; Grantcharov TP; Okrainec A
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 173():349-55. PubMed ID: 22357016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Beyond task time: automated measurement augments fundamentals of laparoscopic skills methodology.
Kowalewski TM; White LW; Lendvay TS; Jiang IS; Sweet R; Wright A; Hannaford B; Sinanan MN
J Surg Res; 2014 Dec; 192(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 25108691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Completion of a novel, virtual-reality-based, advanced laparoscopic curriculum improves advanced laparoscopic skills in senior residents.
Panait L; Hogle NJ; Fowler DL; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Duffy AJ
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(2):121-5. PubMed ID: 21338968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Face validation of the virtual basic laparoscopic skill trainer (VBLaST).
Sankaranarayanan G; Arikatla S; Lin H; Jones D; De S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2009; 142():286-8. PubMed ID: 19377169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?
Thijssen AS; Schijven MP
Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 20080227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Virtual reality simulator training for laparoscopic colectomy: what metrics have construct validity?
Shanmugan S; Leblanc F; Senagore AJ; Ellis CN; Stein SL; Khan S; Delaney CP; Champagne BJ
Dis Colon Rectum; 2014 Feb; 57(2):210-4. PubMed ID: 24401883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery training in a fourth-year medical school advanced surgical skills elective.
Edelman DA; Mattos MA; Bouwman DL
J Surg Res; 2012 Oct; 177(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 22682529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlating virtual reality and box trainer tasks in the assessment of laparoscopic surgical skills.
Newmark J; Dandolu V; Milner R; Grewal H; Harbison S; Hernandez E
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Nov; 197(5):546.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17980205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does laparoscopic simulation predict intraoperative performance? A comparison between the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery and LapVR evaluation metrics.
Steigerwald SN; Park J; Hardy KM; Gillman LM; Vergis AS
Am J Surg; 2015 Jan; 209(1):34-9. PubMed ID: 25454953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Convergent validation and transfer of learning studies of a virtual reality-based pattern cutting simulator.
Nemani A; Ahn W; Cooper C; Schwaitzberg S; De S
Surg Endosc; 2018 Mar; 32(3):1265-1272. PubMed ID: 28812196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of individual hand performance in box trainers compared to virtual reality trainers.
Madan AK; Frantzides CT; Shervin N; Tebbit CL
Am Surg; 2003 Dec; 69(12):1112-4. PubMed ID: 14700302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The added value of virtual reality technology and force feedback for surgical training simulators.
Zhang L; Grosdemouge C; Arikatla VS; Ahn W; Sankaranarayanan G; De S; Jones D; Schwaitzberg S; Cao CG
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2288-92. PubMed ID: 22317056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fundamentals of neurosurgery: virtual reality tasks for training and evaluation of technical skills.
Choudhury N; Gélinas-Phaneuf N; Delorme S; Del Maestro R
World Neurosurg; 2013 Nov; 80(5):e9-19. PubMed ID: 23178917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effectiveness of laparoscopic computer simulator versus usage of box trainer for endoscopic surgery training of novices.
Diesen DL; Erhunmwunsee L; Bennett KM; Ben-David K; Yurcisin B; Ceppa EP; Omotosho PA; Perez A; Pryor A
J Surg Educ; 2011; 68(4):282-9. PubMed ID: 21708364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Concurrent validity of augmented reality metrics applied to the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery (FLS).
Ritter EM; Kindelan TW; Michael C; Pimentel EA; Bowyer MW
Surg Endosc; 2007 Aug; 21(8):1441-5. PubMed ID: 17593461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Toward technology-supported surgical training: the potential of virtual simulators in laparoscopic surgery.
Beyer-Berjot L; Aggarwal R
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 24056136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. LapMentor metrics possess limited construct validity.
Andreatta PB; Woodrum DT; Gauger PG; Minter RM
Simul Healthc; 2008; 3(1):16-25. PubMed ID: 19088638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of a virtual intracorporeal suturing simulator.
Fu Y; Cavuoto L; Qi D; Panneerselvam K; Yang G; Artikala VS; Enquobahrie A; De S; Schwaitzberg SD
Surg Endosc; 2019 Aug; 33(8):2468-2472. PubMed ID: 30334151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Virtual reality versus box laparoscopic simulators in trainee selection and aptitude testing.
Hennessey IA; Hewett P
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Aug; 24(4):318-21. PubMed ID: 25077635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
