These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22357123)

  • 1. Diagnosing a common rater halo effect using the polytomous Rasch model.
    Marais I; Andrich D
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):194-211. PubMed ID: 22357123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: part I.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(4):386-422. PubMed ID: 14523257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting and measuring rater effects using many-facet Rasch measurement: Part II.
    Myford CM; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2004; 5(2):189-227. PubMed ID: 15064538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Team assessment utilizing a many-facet Rasch model.
    Allen JM; Schumacker RE
    J Outcome Meas; 1998; 2(2):142-58. PubMed ID: 9661736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Investigation of 360-degree instrumentation effects: application of the Rasch rating scale model.
    Kulas JT; Hannum KM
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):404-16. PubMed ID: 18250526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rater effect comparability in local independence and rater bundle models.
    Wolfe EW; Song T
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 24950533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Detecting differential rater functioning over time (DRIFT) using a Rasch multi-faceted rating scale model.
    Wolfe EW; Moulder BC; Myford CM
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(3):256-80. PubMed ID: 12011510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing holistic and analytic scoring for performance assessment with many-facet Rasch model.
    Chi E
    J Appl Meas; 2001; 2(4):379-88. PubMed ID: 12011505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Using the Rasch model in nursing research: an introduction and illustrative example.
    Hagquist C; Bruce M; Gustavsson JP
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Mar; 46(3):380-93. PubMed ID: 19059593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Construct validity of scores/measures from a developmental assessment in mathematics using classical and many-facet Rasch measurement.
    Banerji M
    J Appl Meas; 2000; 1(2):177-98. PubMed ID: 12029177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Objective measurement of figure skating performance.
    Looney MA
    J Outcome Meas; 1997; 1(2):143-63. PubMed ID: 9661718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Equating of multi-facet tests across administrations.
    Lunz M; Suanthong S
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(2):124-34. PubMed ID: 22089509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Examining rating quality in writing assessment: rater agreement, error, and accuracy.
    Wind SA; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2012; 13(4):321-35. PubMed ID: 23270978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Two strategies for fitting real data to Rasch polytomous models.
    Rojas Tejada AJ; Gonzalez Gomez A; Padilla Garcia JL; Perez Melendez C
    J Appl Meas; 2002; 3(2):129-45. PubMed ID: 12011498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Impact of Vision Impairment Questionnaire: an evaluation of its measurement properties using Rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Nov; 47(11):4732-41. PubMed ID: 17065481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Response dependence and the measurement of change.
    Marais I
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(1):17-29. PubMed ID: 19299882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring disability in Medicare home care patients: application of Rasch modeling to the outcome and assessment information set.
    Fortinsky RH; Garcia RI; Joseph Sheehan T; Madigan EA; Tullai-McGuinness S
    Med Care; 2003 May; 41(5):601-15. PubMed ID: 12719685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A Rasch analysis of the Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C.
    Näring GW; Hoogduin KA; Keijser CM
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2004 Jul; 52(3):250-9. PubMed ID: 15370357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effective number of subjects and number of raters for inter-rater reliability studies.
    Saito Y; Sozu T; Hamada C; Yoshimura I
    Stat Med; 2006 May; 25(9):1547-60. PubMed ID: 16143966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using classical and modern measurement theories to explore rater, domain, and gender influences on student writing ability.
    Gyagenda IS; Engelhard G
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 19671987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.