BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

236 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22357124)

  • 1. A comparison of structural equation and multidimensional Rasch modeling approaches to Confirmatory Factor Analysis.
    Wolfe EW; Singh K
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(3):212-21. PubMed ID: 22357124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and multidimensional Rasch models to investigate the dimensionality of test-taking motivation.
    Demars CE
    J Appl Meas; 2013; 14(2):179-96. PubMed ID: 23816595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Marsh HW; Morin AJ; Parker PD; Kaur G
    Annu Rev Clin Psychol; 2014; 10():85-110. PubMed ID: 24313568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A combined-method psychometric analysis recommended modification of the multidimensional health locus of control scales.
    Kelly PA; Kallen MA; Suárez-Almazor ME
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 May; 60(5):440-7. PubMed ID: 17419954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Confirmatory factor analysis: an introduction for psychosomatic medicine researchers.
    Babyak MA; Green SB
    Psychosom Med; 2010 Jul; 72(6):587-97. PubMed ID: 20467001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factor analytic models: viewing the structure of an assessment instrument from three perspectives.
    Byrne BM
    J Pers Assess; 2005 Aug; 85(1):17-32. PubMed ID: 16083381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of vision impairment questionnaire: an assessment of its domain structure using confirmatory factor analysis and rasch analysis.
    Lamoureux EL; Pallant JF; Pesudovs K; Rees G; Hassell JB; Keeffe JE
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar; 48(3):1001-6. PubMed ID: 17325138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The application of structural equation model approach in epidemiological research].
    Yang TZ; Ruan HJ; Li FZ
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2005 Apr; 26(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 15941543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. On the use of structural equation modeling in health communication research.
    Stephenson MT; Holbert RL; Zimmerman RS
    Health Commun; 2006; 20(2):159-67. PubMed ID: 16965253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality.
    Reise SP; Bonifay WE; Haviland MG
    J Pers Assess; 2013; 95(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 23030794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing groups on latent variables: a structural equation modeling approach.
    Dimitrov DM
    Work; 2006; 26(4):429-36. PubMed ID: 16788262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Muthén B; Asparouhov T; Morin AJ; Trautwein U; Nagengast B
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):471-91. PubMed ID: 20822261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validating the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in people with type 2 diabetes: Latent trait analyses applying multidimensional Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
    Finbråten HS; Pettersen KS; Wilde-Larsson B; Nordström G; Trollvik A; Guttersrud Ø
    J Adv Nurs; 2017 Nov; 73(11):2730-2744. PubMed ID: 28543754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal patterns of variable relationships in person-oriented research: longitudinal models of configural frequency analysis.
    von Eye A; Mun EY; Bogat GA
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Mar; 44(2):437-45. PubMed ID: 18331134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Structural equation modeling: basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research.
    Crowley SL; Fan X
    J Pers Assess; 1997 Jun; 68(3):508-31. PubMed ID: 9170298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An application of the multidimensional random coefficients multinomial logit model to evaluating cognitive models of reasoning in genetics.
    Wolfe EW; Hickey DT; Kindfield AC
    J Appl Meas; 2009; 10(2):196-207. PubMed ID: 19564699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance of the likelihood ratio difference (G2 Diff) test for detecting unidimensionality in applications of the multidimensional Rasch model.
    Harrell-Williams L; Wolfe EW
    J Appl Meas; 2014; 15(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 24992250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing standardized coefficients in structural equation modeling: a model reparameterization approach.
    Kwan JL; Chan W
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):730-45. PubMed ID: 21512876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads.
    Olsen JA; Kenny DA
    Psychol Methods; 2006 Jun; 11(2):127-41. PubMed ID: 16784334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of structural equation modeling to health outcomes research.
    Hays RD; Revicki D; Coyne KS
    Eval Health Prof; 2005 Sep; 28(3):295-309. PubMed ID: 16123259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.