147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22358014)
1. Clinically missed cancer: how effectively can radiologists use computer-aided detection?
Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Linver MN; Edwards AV; Papaioannou J; Stull MA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):708-16. PubMed ID: 22358014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. 1000-Case Reader Study of Radiologists' Performance in Interpretation of Automated Breast Volume Scanner Images with a Computer-Aided Detection System.
Xu X; Bao L; Tan Y; Zhu L; Kong F; Wang W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1694-1702. PubMed ID: 29853222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammographic characteristics of 115 missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection.
Birdwell RL; Ikeda DM; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA
Radiology; 2001 Apr; 219(1):192-202. PubMed ID: 11274556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial.
Brem RF; Baum J; Lechner M; Kaplan S; Souders S; Naul LG; Hoffmeister J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Sep; 181(3):687-93. PubMed ID: 12933460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An investigation into the mammographic appearances of missed breast cancers when recall rates are reduced.
Mohd Norsuddin N; Mello-Thoms C; Reed W; Rickard M; Lewis S
Br J Radiol; 2017 Aug; 90(1076):20170048. PubMed ID: 28621548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Mammographic density and cancer detection: does digital imaging challenge our current understanding?
Al Mousa DS; Mello-Thoms C; Ryan EA; Lee WB; Pietrzyk MW; Reed WM; Heard R; Poulos A; Tan J; Li Y; Brennan PC
Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1377-85. PubMed ID: 25097013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast cancer: effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis observer study with independent database of mammograms.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Vyborny CJ; Metz CE
Radiology; 2002 Aug; 224(2):560-8. PubMed ID: 12147857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of independent double readings and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) for the diagnosis of breast calcifications.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Metz CE
Acad Radiol; 2006 Jan; 13(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 16399036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided classification of BI-RADS category 3 breast lesions.
Buchbinder SS; Leichter IS; Lederman RB; Novak B; Bamberger PN; Sklair-Levy M; Yarmish G; Fields SI
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):820-3. PubMed ID: 14739315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exploring the potential of context-sensitive CADe in screening mammography.
Tourassi GD; Mazurowski MA; Harrawood BP; Krupinski EA
Med Phys; 2010 Nov; 37(11):5728-36. PubMed ID: 21158284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Computer-aided detection of peripheral lung cancers missed at CT: ROC analyses without and with localization.
Li F; Arimura H; Suzuki K; Shiraishi J; Li Q; Abe H; Engelmann R; Sone S; MacMahon H; Doi K
Radiology; 2005 Nov; 237(2):684-90. PubMed ID: 16244277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sensitivity of noncommercial computer-aided detection system for mammographic breast cancer detection: pilot clinical trial.
Helvie MA; Hadjiiski L; Makariou E; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Lo SC; Freedman M; Adler D; Bailey J; Blane C; Hoff D; Hunt K; Joynt L; Klein K; Paramagul C; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA
Radiology; 2004 Apr; 231(1):208-14. PubMed ID: 14990808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography.
Ko JM; Nicholas MJ; Mendel JB; Slanetz PJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Dec; 187(6):1483-91. PubMed ID: 17114541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radiologists’ Performance at Reduced Recall Rates in Mammography: A Laboratory Study.
Mohd Norsuddin N; Mello-Thoms C; Reed W; Lewis S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2019 Feb; 20(2):537-543. PubMed ID: 30803217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. "Memory effect" in observer performance studies of mammograms.
Hardesty LA; Ganott MA; Hakim CM; Cohen CS; Clearfield RJ; Gur D
Acad Radiol; 2005 Mar; 12(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 15766687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing the stand-alone sensitivity of computer-aided detection with cancer cases from the Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
Cole EB; Zhang Z; Marques HS; Nishikawa RM; Hendrick RE; Yaffe MJ; Padungchaichote W; Kuzmiak C; Chayakulkheeree J; Conant EF; Fajardo LL; Baum J; Gatsonis C; Pisano E
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Sep; 199(3):W392-401. PubMed ID: 22915432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mammographic features of breast cancers at single reading with computer-aided detection and at double reading in a large multicenter prospective trial of computer-aided detection: CADET II.
James JJ; Gilbert FJ; Wallis MG; Gillan MG; Astley SM; Boggis CR; Agbaje OF; Brentnall AR; Duffy SW
Radiology; 2010 Aug; 256(2):379-86. PubMed ID: 20656831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Potential of computer-aided diagnosis to reduce variability in radiologists' interpretations of mammograms depicting microcalcifications.
Jiang Y; Nishikawa RM; Schmidt RA; Toledano AY; Doi K
Radiology; 2001 Sep; 220(3):787-94. PubMed ID: 11526283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessing the effect of a true-positive recall case in screening mammography: does perceptual priming alter radiologists' performance?
Lewis SJ; Mello-Thoms CR; Brennan PC; Lee W; Tan A; McEntee MF; Evanoff M; Pietrzyk M; Reed WM
Br J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 87(1039):20140029. PubMed ID: 24814694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Computer-aided detection output on 172 subtle findings on normal mammograms previously obtained in women with breast cancer detected at follow-up screening mammography.
Ikeda DM; Birdwell RL; O'Shaughnessy KF; Sickles EA; Brenner RJ
Radiology; 2004 Mar; 230(3):811-9. PubMed ID: 14764891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
