334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22358015)
1. Diffusion-weighted imaging of breast masses: comparison of diagnostic performance using various apparent diffusion coefficient parameters.
Hirano M; Satake H; Ishigaki S; Ikeda M; Kawai H; Naganawa S
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Mar; 198(3):717-22. PubMed ID: 22358015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Apparent diffusion coefficient values for discriminating benign and malignant breast MRI lesions: effects of lesion type and size.
Partridge SC; Mullins CD; Kurland BF; Allain MD; DeMartini WB; Eby PR; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jun; 194(6):1664-73. PubMed ID: 20489111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Characterization of breast masses as benign or malignant at 3.0T MRI with whole-lesion histogram analysis of the apparent diffusion coefficient.
Suo S; Zhang K; Cao M; Suo X; Hua J; Geng X; Chen J; Zhuang Z; Ji X; Lu Q; Wang H; Xu J
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Apr; 43(4):894-902. PubMed ID: 26343918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast masses using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.
Min Q; Shao K; Zhai L; Liu W; Zhu C; Yuan L; Yang J
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Feb; 13():32. PubMed ID: 25889380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Role of Combined Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI for Differentiating Malignant From Benign Breast Lesions Presenting Washout Curve.
Tezcan S; Ozturk FU; Uslu N; Akcay EY
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2021 Aug; 72(3):460-469. PubMed ID: 32157892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic performance of ADC for Non-mass-like breast lesions on MR imaging.
Imamura T; Isomoto I; Sueyoshi E; Yano H; Uga T; Abe K; Hayashi T; Honda S; Yamaguchi T; Uetani M
Magn Reson Med Sci; 2010; 9(4):217-25. PubMed ID: 21187691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast lesion characterization using whole-lesion histogram analysis with stretched-exponential diffusion model.
Liu C; Wang K; Li X; Zhang J; Ding J; Spuhler K; Duong T; Liang C; Huang C
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Jun; 47(6):1701-1710. PubMed ID: 29165847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging as an adjunct to conventional breast MRI for improved positive predictive value.
Partridge SC; DeMartini WB; Kurland BF; Eby PR; White SW; Lehman CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Dec; 193(6):1716-22. PubMed ID: 19933670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diffusion-weighted imaging with fat suppression using short-tau inversion recovery: Clinical utility for diagnosis of breast lesions.
Ouyang Z; Ouyang Y; Zhu M; Lu Y; Zhang Z; Shi J; Li X; Ren G
Clin Radiol; 2014 Aug; 69(8):e337-44. PubMed ID: 24837698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Discrimination between benign and malignant testicular lesions using volumetric apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis.
Fan C; Min X; Feng Z; Cai W; Li B; Zhang P; You H; Xie J; Wang L
Eur J Radiol; 2020 May; 126():108939. PubMed ID: 32171915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) in evaluation of breast lesions: comparison with conventional DWI.
Liu C; Liang C; Liu Z; Zhang S; Huang B
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e782-9. PubMed ID: 24034833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diffusion kurtosis imaging does not improve differentiation performance of breast lesions in a short clinical protocol.
Palm T; Wenkel E; Ohlmeyer S; Janka R; Uder M; Weiland E; Bickelhaupt S; Ladd ME; Zaitsev M; Hensel B; Laun FB
Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Nov; 63():205-216. PubMed ID: 31425816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of the diagnostic performances of diffusion parameters in diffusion weighted imaging and diffusion tensor imaging of breast lesions.
Cakir O; Arslan A; Inan N; Anık Y; Sarısoy T; Gumustas S; Akansel G
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Dec; 82(12):e801-6. PubMed ID: 24099642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation of benign from malignant adnexal masses by functional 3 tesla MRI techniques: diffusion-weighted imaging and time-intensity curves of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Malek M; Pourashraf M; Mousavi AS; Rahmani M; Ahmadinejad N; Alipour A; Hashemi FS; Shakiba M
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(8):3407-12. PubMed ID: 25921153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective analysis of the utility of multiparametric MRI for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions in women in China.
Fan WX; Chen XF; Cheng FY; Cheng YB; Xu T; Zhu WB; Zhu XL; Li GJ; Li S
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jan; 97(4):e9666. PubMed ID: 29369183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diffusion-weighted imaging improves the diagnostic accuracy of conventional 3.0-T breast MR imaging.
Ei Khouli RH; Jacobs MA; Mezban SD; Huang P; Kamel IR; Macura KJ; Bluemke DA
Radiology; 2010 Jul; 256(1):64-73. PubMed ID: 20574085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic performance of apparent diffusion coefficient and quantitative kinetic parameters for predicting additional malignancy in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer.
Yoo H; Shin HJ; Baek S; Cha JH; Kim H; Chae EY; Kim HH
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):867-74. PubMed ID: 24907855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improved diagnostic accuracy of breast MRI through combined apparent diffusion coefficients and dynamic contrast-enhanced kinetics.
Partridge SC; Rahbar H; Murthy R; Chai X; Kurland BF; DeMartini WB; Lehman CD
Magn Reson Med; 2011 Jun; 65(6):1759-67. PubMed ID: 21254208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method.
Murakami R; Hirai T; Sugahara T; Fukuoka H; Toya R; Nishimura S; Kitajima M; Okuda T; Nakamura H; Oya N; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):838-45. PubMed ID: 19318585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of Liver Tumors by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging: Comparison of Diagnostic Performance Using the Mean and Minimum Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.
Namimoto T; Nakagawa M; Kizaki Y; Itatani R; Kidoh M; Utsunomiya D; Oda S; Yamashita Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):453-61. PubMed ID: 25836022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
