These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

382 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22358805)

  • 1. Extra scrutiny for 'grandee grantees'.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2012 Feb; 482(7386):450-1. PubMed ID: 22358805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Science policy: Well-funded investigators should receive extra scrutiny.
    Berg JM
    Nature; 2012 Sep; 489(7415):203. PubMed ID: 22972279
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. NIH: grants revamp needs grounding in evidence.
    Hannun YA
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Peer review reviewed.
    Nature; 2007 Sep; 449(7159):115. PubMed ID: 17851475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An unhealthy obsession.
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):7. PubMed ID: 23236611
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 222 NIH grants: 22 researchers.
    Hand E
    Nature; 2008 Mar; 452(7185):258-9. PubMed ID: 18354436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research grants: Conform and be funded.
    Nicholson JM; Ioannidis JP
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7427):34-6. PubMed ID: 23222591
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. NIH responds to critics on peer review.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Jun; 453(7197):835. PubMed ID: 18548033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Science funding: Duel to the death.
    Bhattacharya A
    Nature; 2012 Aug; 488(7409):20-2. PubMed ID: 22859184
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. NIH: Drop re-review for big grant holders.
    Roy HK
    Nature; 2012 Oct; 490(7419):176. PubMed ID: 23060177
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. No more third time lucky.
    Ledford H
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7215):841. PubMed ID: 18923475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Revamp for NIH grants.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2008 Feb; 451(7182):1035. PubMed ID: 18305502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIH funding: It does support innovators.
    Salzberg SL
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):26. PubMed ID: 23282352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Science agencies prepare for cuts.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 2013 Feb; 494(7436):158-9. PubMed ID: 23407517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. NIH funding: The critics respond.
    Ioannidis JP; Nicholson JM
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):26. PubMed ID: 23282353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. NIH funding: Agency rebuts critique.
    Santangelo G; Lipman DJ
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7430):26. PubMed ID: 23282354
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grappling for grants.
    Smaglik P
    Nature; 2002 Oct; 419(6909):3. PubMed ID: 12397310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NIH: researchers lose out to war, not to each other.
    Vermund SH
    Nature; 2008 Apr; 452(7189):811. PubMed ID: 18421327
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. NIH funding: Thousand-citation papers are outliers.
    Woodgett J
    Nature; 2012 Dec; 492(7429):356. PubMed ID: 23257869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grant applications: Undo NIH policy to ease effect of cuts.
    Benezra R
    Nature; 2013 Jan; 493(7433):480. PubMed ID: 23344348
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.