83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22359416)
1. Preferences for the normative basis of health care priority setting: some evidence from two countries.
Olsen JA; Richardson J
Health Econ; 2013 Apr; 22(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 22359416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the relevance of personal characteristics in setting health priorities: a comment on Olsen, Richardson, Dolan and Menzel (2003).
Mortimer D
Soc Sci Med; 2005 Apr; 60(8):1661-4; discussion 1665-6. PubMed ID: 15686798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Understanding public preferences for prioritizing health care interventions in England: does the type of health gain matter?
Mason H; Baker R; Donaldson C
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Apr; 16(2):81-9. PubMed ID: 21447843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Public views on principles for health care priority setting: findings of a European cross-country study using Q methodology.
van Exel J; Baker R; Mason H; Donaldson C; Brouwer W;
Soc Sci Med; 2015 Feb; 126():128-37. PubMed ID: 25550076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Involving the general public in priority setting: experiences from Australia.
Wiseman V; Mooney G; Berry G; Tang KC
Soc Sci Med; 2003 Mar; 56(5):1001-12. PubMed ID: 12593873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fairness and accountability for reasonableness. Do the views of priority setting decision makers differ across health systems and levels of decision making?
Kapiriri L; Norheim OF; Martin DK
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Feb; 68(4):766-73. PubMed ID: 19070414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision-making in priority setting for medicines--a review of empirical studies.
Vuorenkoski L; Toiviainen H; Hemminki E
Health Policy; 2008 Apr; 86(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 17950484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision-making criteria among national policymakers in five countries: a discrete choice experiment eliciting relative preferences for equity and efficiency.
Mirelman A; Mentzakis E; Kinter E; Paolucci F; Fordham R; Ozawa S; Ferraz M; Baltussen R; Niessen LW
Value Health; 2012 May; 15(3):534-9. PubMed ID: 22583464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Investigating public preferences on 'severity of health' as a relevant condition for setting healthcare priorities.
Green C
Soc Sci Med; 2009 Jun; 68(12):2247-55. PubMed ID: 19406545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Understanding what matters: An exploratory study to investigate the views of the general public for priority setting criteria in health care.
Ratcliffe J; Lancsar E; Walker R; Gu Y
Health Policy; 2017 Jun; 121(6):653-662. PubMed ID: 28411964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Can a moral reasoning exercise improve response quality to surveys of healthcare priorities?
Johri M; Damschroder LJ; Zikmund-Fisher BJ; Kim SY; Ubel PA
J Med Ethics; 2009 Jan; 35(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 19103946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Democratic institutional design in health care priority setting and rationing].
Landwehr C
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes; 2012; 106(6):407-11. PubMed ID: 22857727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Priority setting in health - a political economy perspective.
Goddard M; Hauck K; Smith PC
Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jan; 1(Pt 1):79-90. PubMed ID: 18634704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. On the relevance of personal responsibility in priority setting: a cross-sectional survey among Norwegian medical doctors.
Bringedal B; Feiring E
J Med Ethics; 2011 Jun; 37(6):357-61. PubMed ID: 21335575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prioritizing treatment of rare diseases: a survey of preferences of Norwegian doctors.
Desser AS
Soc Sci Med; 2013 Oct; 94():56-62. PubMed ID: 23931945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Priority setting in health care as portrayed in South Korean and Israeli newspapers.
Factor R; Kang M
Health Policy; 2014 Feb; 114(2-3):226-35. PubMed ID: 24388048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [How important is it for the patient to have a personal physician? A study of patients' attitudes and views on the accessibility of alternative health services in Bergen].
Bomann-Larsen P; Otterstad HK
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1990 Nov; 110(27):3509-11. PubMed ID: 2256085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Supporting tough decisions in Norway: a healthcare system approach.
Mørland B; Ringard A; Røttingen JA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Oct; 26(4):398-404. PubMed ID: 20942984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing the preferences of health professionals and members of the public for setting health care priorities : experiences from Australia.
Wiseman V
Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2005; 4(2):129-37. PubMed ID: 16162032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
