226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22360125)
1. A better quality of life with implant-retained overdentures.
Patel PB; Brown S; Nazarian A
Dent Today; 2012 Jan; 31(1):156, 158. PubMed ID: 22360125
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers.
Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
Gerodontology; 2012 Jun; 29(2):e618-23. PubMed ID: 21726276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Patient satisfaction with maxillary 3-implant overdentures using different attachment systems opposing mandibular 2-implant overdentures.
Al-Zubeidi MI; Alsabeeha NH; Thomson WM; Payne AG
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 May; 14 Suppl 1():e11-9. PubMed ID: 21414137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Metal-reinforced single implant mandibular overdenture retained by an attachment: a clinical report.
Grageda E; Rieck B
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 24199604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.
De Kok IJ; Chang KH; Lu TS; Cooper LF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(2):415-26. PubMed ID: 21483895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.
Geertman ME; van Waas MA; van 't Hof MA; Kalk W
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 8666450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of three different attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: one-year report.
Kleis WK; Kämmerer PW; Hartmann S; Al-Nawas B; Wagner W
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):209-18. PubMed ID: 19416278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The McGill Consensus Statement on Overdentures. Mandibular 2-implant overdentures as first choice standard of care for edentulous patients.
Thomason JM
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2002 Sep; 10(3):95-6. PubMed ID: 12387249
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Chairside method for incorporating metal O-ring attachment in mandibular implant-retained overdenture.
Guttal SS; Patil NP; Nadiger R
N Y State Dent J; 2011; 77(5):50-2. PubMed ID: 22029116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Correction of nonparallel implants for an implant-retained overdenture.
Nunes DB; da Silva P; Pereira-Cenci T; Garbin CA; Schuh C; Boscato N
Gen Dent; 2010; 58(4):e168-71. PubMed ID: 20591765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Small-diameter implants for optimal stabilization of implant-supported overdentures.
Misch K; Neiva R
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 19(7):428-31. PubMed ID: 17929685
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Space requirements for implant-retained bar-and-clip overdentures.
Phillips K; Wong KM
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2001 Jun; 22(6):516-8, 520, 522. PubMed ID: 11913302
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Full-arch metal-resin cement- and screw-retained provisional restoration for immediately loaded implants.
Baig MR; Rajan G
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 20553176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants--Part II.
Warreth A; Byrne C; Alkadhimi AF; Woods E; Sultan A
J Ir Dent Assoc; 2015; 61(3):144-8. PubMed ID: 26285567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. An alternate pressure-free functional impression technique for implant-retained overdentures.
Uludag B
J Oral Implantol; 2010; 36(3):205-7. PubMed ID: 20553174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The extent of maintenance required by implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year report.
Davis DM; Rogers JO; Packer ME
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1996; 11(6):767-74. PubMed ID: 8990639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.
Abd El-Dayem MA; Assad AS; Eldin Sanad ME; Mahmoud Mogahed SA
Implant Dent; 2009 Dec; 18(6):501-11. PubMed ID: 20009604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of ball and telescopic crown attachments in implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 5-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Seemann R; Weinländer M; Piehslinger E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(3):598-606. PubMed ID: 21691608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
