245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22360591)
21. Independence of visual awareness from the scope of attention: an electrophysiological study.
Koivisto M; Revonsuo A; Lehtonen M
Cereb Cortex; 2006 Mar; 16(3):415-24. PubMed ID: 15958780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Using frequency tagging to quantify attentional deployment in a visual divided attention task.
Toffanin P; de Jong R; Johnson A; Martens S
Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Jun; 72(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 19452603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Neural basis of auditory-induced shifts in visual time-order perception.
McDonald JJ; Teder-Sälejärvi WA; Di Russo F; Hillyard SA
Nat Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 8(9):1197-202. PubMed ID: 16056224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Attentional Selection of Feature Conjunctions Is Accomplished by Parallel and Independent Selection of Single Features.
Andersen SK; Müller MM; Hillyard SA
J Neurosci; 2015 Jul; 35(27):9912-9. PubMed ID: 26156992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Voluntary attention changes the speed of perceptual neural processing.
Noguchi Y; Tanabe HC; Sadato N; Hoshiyama M; Kakigi R
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3163-72. PubMed ID: 17561830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Attentional changes in pre-stimulus oscillatory activity within early visual cortex are predictive of human visual performance.
Yamagishi N; Callan DE; Anderson SJ; Kawato M
Brain Res; 2008 Mar; 1197():115-22. PubMed ID: 18241846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Selective attention to specific features within objects: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence.
Nobre AC; Rao A; Chelazzi L
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Apr; 18(4):539-61. PubMed ID: 16768359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Frequency-modulated steady-state visual evoked potentials: a new stimulation method for brain-computer interfaces.
Dreyer AM; Herrmann CS
J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Feb; 241():1-9. PubMed ID: 25522824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. From local inhibition to long-range integration: a functional dissociation of alpha-band synchronization across cortical scales in visuospatial attention.
Doesburg SM; Green JJ; McDonald JJ; Ward LM
Brain Res; 2009 Dec; 1303():97-110. PubMed ID: 19782056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Visual spatial attention tracking using high-density SSVEP data for independent brain-computer communication.
Kelly SP; Lalor EC; Reilly RB; Foxe JJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Jun; 13(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 16003896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The time course of cortical facilitation during cued shifts of spatial attention.
Müller MM; Teder-Sälejärvi W; Hillyard SA
Nat Neurosci; 1998 Nov; 1(7):631-4. PubMed ID: 10196572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A comparison of three brain-computer interfaces based on event-related desynchronization, steady state visual evoked potentials, or a hybrid approach using both signals.
Brunner C; Allison BZ; Altstätter C; Neuper C
J Neural Eng; 2011 Apr; 8(2):025010. PubMed ID: 21436538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. EEG-based classification of video quality perception using steady state visual evoked potentials (SSVEPs).
Acqualagna L; Bosse S; Porbadnigk AK; Curio G; Müller KR; Wiegand T; Blankertz B
J Neural Eng; 2015 Apr; 12(2):026012. PubMed ID: 25768913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Steady-state visually evoked potential correlates of object recognition.
Kaspar K; Hassler U; Martens U; Trujillo-Barreto N; Gruber T
Brain Res; 2010 Jul; 1343():112-21. PubMed ID: 20450897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Stimulus specificity of a steady-state visual-evoked potential-based brain-computer interface.
Ng KB; Bradley AP; Cunnington R
J Neural Eng; 2012 Jun; 9(3):036008. PubMed ID: 22589242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influences of encoding and retrieval on the steady-state visual evoked potential.
Martens U; Gert AL; Gruber T
Neuroreport; 2012 Apr; 23(6):337-41. PubMed ID: 22367760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Neural mechanisms of global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs: an ERP study.
Jiang Y; Han S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1444-54. PubMed ID: 15978507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Perception of illusory contours forms intermodulation responses of steady state visual evoked potentials as a neural signature of spatial integration.
Gundlach C; Müller MM
Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):55-60. PubMed ID: 23665197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shifts of visual spatial attention modulate a steady-state visual evoked potential.
Belmonte M
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 1998 Apr; 6(4):295-307. PubMed ID: 9593953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
