These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
242 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22360591)
41. The influence of cognitive tasks on different frequencies steady-state visual evoked potentials. Wu Z; Yao D Brain Topogr; 2007; 20(2):97-104. PubMed ID: 17932738 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Involuntary orientation of attention to unattended deviant nociceptive stimuli is modulated by concomitant visual task difficulty. Evidence from laser evoked potentials. Legrain V; Bruyer R; Guérit JM; Plaghki L Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Sep; 116(9):2165-74. PubMed ID: 16055373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Selective attention to stimulus location modulates the steady-state visual evoked potential. Morgan ST; Hansen JC; Hillyard SA Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 May; 93(10):4770-4. PubMed ID: 8643478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Attention modulates gamma-band oscillations differently in the human lateral occipital cortex and fusiform gyrus. Tallon-Baudry C; Bertrand O; Hénaff MA; Isnard J; Fischer C Cereb Cortex; 2005 May; 15(5):654-62. PubMed ID: 15371290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Stimulus intensity affects the latency but not the amplitude of the N2pc. Brisson B; Robitaille N; Jolicoeur P Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(15):1627-30. PubMed ID: 17885614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. From prestimulus alpha oscillation to visual-evoked response: an inverted-U function and its attentional modulation. Rajagovindan R; Ding M J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 23(6):1379-94. PubMed ID: 20459310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The effect of cannabis use and gender on the visual steady state evoked potential. Skosnik PD; Krishnan GP; Vohs JL; O'Donnell BF Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Jan; 117(1):144-56. PubMed ID: 16364685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Hemispheric modulations of alpha-band power reflect the rightward shift in attention induced by enhanced attentional load. Pérez A; Peers PV; Valdés-Sosa M; Galán L; García L; Martínez-Montes E Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18789956 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Reliance on visual attention during visuomotor adaptation: an SSVEP study. Reuter EM; Bednark J; Cunnington R Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2041-51. PubMed ID: 25893908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Complex-valued spatial filters for SSVEP-based BCIs with phase coding. Falzon O; Camilleri K; Muscat J IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2012 Sep; 59(9):2486-95. PubMed ID: 22736630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Attention differentially modulates the amplitude of resonance frequencies in the visual cortex. Gulbinaite R; Roozendaal DHM; VanRullen R Neuroimage; 2019 Dec; 203():116146. PubMed ID: 31493535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity. Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. On the time course of bottom-up and top-down processes in selective visual attention: an EEG study. Schneider D; Beste C; Wascher E Psychophysiology; 2012 Nov; 49(11):1492-1503. PubMed ID: 22978270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]