These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22360769)

  • 1. Comparison of random forest and Pipeline Pilot Naïve Bayes in prospective QSAR predictions.
    Chen B; Sheridan RP; Hornak V; Voigt JH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):792-803. PubMed ID: 22360769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Profile-QSAR: a novel meta-QSAR method that combines activities across the kinase family to accurately predict affinity, selectivity, and cellular activity.
    Martin E; Mukherjee P; Sullivan D; Jansen J
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Aug; 51(8):1942-56. PubMed ID: 21667971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Three useful dimensions for domain applicability in QSAR models using random forest.
    Sheridan RP
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Mar; 52(3):814-23. PubMed ID: 22385389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. QSAR--how good is it in practice? Comparison of descriptor sets on an unbiased cross section of corporate data sets.
    Gedeck P; Rohde B; Bartels C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(5):1924-36. PubMed ID: 16995723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Random forest: a classification and regression tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling.
    Svetnik V; Liaw A; Tong C; Culberson JC; Sheridan RP; Feuston BP
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(6):1947-58. PubMed ID: 14632445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 4D-fingerprints, universal QSAR and QSPR descriptors.
    Senese CL; Duca J; Pan D; Hopfinger AJ; Tseng YJ
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2004; 44(5):1526-39. PubMed ID: 15446810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contemporary QSAR classifiers compared.
    Bruce CL; Melville JL; Pickett SD; Hirst JD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(1):219-27. PubMed ID: 17238267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of P-glycoprotein substrates.
    de Cerqueira Lima P; Golbraikh A; Oloff S; Xiao Y; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(3):1245-54. PubMed ID: 16711744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. QSAR study of Akt/protein kinase B (PKB) inhibitors using support vector machine.
    Dong X; Jiang C; Hu H; Yan J; Chen J; Hu Y
    Eur J Med Chem; 2009 Oct; 44(10):4090-7. PubMed ID: 19497644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In silico binary classification QSAR models based on 4D-fingerprints and MOE descriptors for prediction of hERG blockage.
    Su BH; Shen MY; Esposito EX; Hopfinger AJ; Tseng YJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jul; 50(7):1304-18. PubMed ID: 20565102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Broad-based quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of potency and selectivity of farnesyltransferase inhibitors using a Bayesian regularized neural network.
    Polley MJ; Winkler DA; Burden FR
    J Med Chem; 2004 Dec; 47(25):6230-8. PubMed ID: 15566293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computational models for the classification of mPGES-1 inhibitors with fingerprint descriptors.
    Xia Z; Yan A
    Mol Divers; 2017 Aug; 21(3):661-675. PubMed ID: 28484935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pre-processing feature selection for improved C&RT models for oral absorption.
    Newby D; Freitas AA; Ghafourian T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2730-42. PubMed ID: 24050619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Note on naive Bayes based on binary descriptors in cheminformatics.
    Townsend JA; Glen RC; Mussa HY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2494-500. PubMed ID: 22900941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Generation of QSAR sets with a self-organizing map.
    Guha R; Serra JR; Jurs PC
    J Mol Graph Model; 2004 Sep; 23(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 15331049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Application of random forest approach to QSAR prediction of aquatic toxicity.
    Polishchuk PG; Muratov EN; Artemenko AG; Kolumbin OG; Muratov NN; Kuz'min VE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Nov; 49(11):2481-8. PubMed ID: 19860412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A rapid computational filter for cytochrome P450 1A2 inhibition potential of compound libraries.
    Chohan KK; Paine SW; Mistry J; Barton P; Davis AM
    J Med Chem; 2005 Aug; 48(16):5154-61. PubMed ID: 16078835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mold(2), molecular descriptors from 2D structures for chemoinformatics and toxicoinformatics.
    Hong H; Xie Q; Ge W; Qian F; Fang H; Shi L; Su Z; Perkins R; Tong W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jul; 48(7):1337-44. PubMed ID: 18564836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative QSAR analyses of competitive CYP2C9 inhibitors using three-dimensional molecular descriptors.
    Lather V; Fernandes MX
    Chem Biol Drug Des; 2011 Jul; 78(1):112-23. PubMed ID: 21477091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Combinatorial QSAR modeling of human intestinal absorption.
    Suenderhauf C; Hammann F; Maunz A; Helma C; Huwyler J
    Mol Pharm; 2011 Feb; 8(1):213-24. PubMed ID: 21142073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.