108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22360790)
21. Ranking targets in structure-based virtual screening of three-dimensional protein libraries: methods and problems.
Kellenberger E; Foata N; Rognan D
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 May; 48(5):1014-25. PubMed ID: 18412328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On the use of molecular dynamics receptor conformations for virtual screening.
Nichols SE; Baron R; McCammon JA
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 819():93-103. PubMed ID: 22183532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Critical comparison of virtual screening methods against the MUV data set.
Tiikkainen P; Markt P; Wolber G; Kirchmair J; Distinto S; Poso A; Kallioniemi O
J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2168-78. PubMed ID: 19799417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Do not hesitate to use Tversky-and other hints for successful active analogue searches with feature count descriptors.
Horvath D; Marcou G; Varnek A
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1543-62. PubMed ID: 23731338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of 3D virtual ligand screening methods: impact of the molecular alignment on enrichment.
Giganti D; Guillemain H; Spadoni JL; Nilges M; Zagury JF; Montes M
J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):992-1004. PubMed ID: 20527883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Integrating virtual screening in lead discovery.
Oprea TI; Matter H
Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2004 Aug; 8(4):349-58. PubMed ID: 15288243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. VSViewer3D: a tool for interactive data mining of three-dimensional virtual screening data.
Diller KI; Diller DJ
J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Dec; 54(12):3446-52. PubMed ID: 25423583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Similarity searching for potent compounds using feature selection.
Vogt M; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1613-9. PubMed ID: 23808911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of topological descriptors for similarity-based virtual screening using multiple bioactive reference structures.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
Org Biomol Chem; 2004 Nov; 2(22):3256-66. PubMed ID: 15534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Virtual screening - what does it give us?
Köppen H
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2009 May; 12(3):397-407. PubMed ID: 19396741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. FieldChopper, a new tool for automatic model generation and virtual screening based on molecular fields.
Kalliokoski T; Ronkko T; Poso A
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jun; 48(6):1131-7. PubMed ID: 18489083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Virtual screening strategies in drug discovery.
McInnes C
Curr Opin Chem Biol; 2007 Oct; 11(5):494-502. PubMed ID: 17936059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of confirmed inactive and randomly selected compounds as negative training examples in support vector machine-based virtual screening.
Heikamp K; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jul; 53(7):1595-601. PubMed ID: 23799269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. New methods for ligand-based virtual screening: use of data fusion and machine learning to enhance the effectiveness of similarity searching.
Hert J; Willett P; Wilton DJ; Acklin P; Azzaoui K; Jacoby E; Schuffenhauer A
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 16562973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Novel 2D fingerprints for ligand-based virtual screening.
Ewing T; Baber JC; Feher M
J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(6):2423-31. PubMed ID: 17125184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. REPROVIS-DB: a benchmark system for ligand-based virtual screening derived from reproducible prospective applications.
Ripphausen P; Wassermann AM; Bajorath J
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2467-73. PubMed ID: 21902278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Quantum-Based Similarity Method in Virtual Screening.
Al-Dabbagh MM; Salim N; Himmat M; Ahmed A; Saeed F
Molecules; 2015 Oct; 20(10):18107-27. PubMed ID: 26445039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Adapting Document Similarity Measures for Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.
Himmat M; Salim N; Al-Dabbagh MM; Saeed F; Ahmed A
Molecules; 2016 Apr; 21(4):476. PubMed ID: 27089312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Automatic tailoring and transplanting: a practical method that makes virtual screening more useful.
Li Y; Zhao Y; Liu Z; Wang R
J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1474-91. PubMed ID: 21520918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Pharmacophore alignment search tool: influence of the third dimension on text-based similarity searching.
Hähnke V; Klenner A; Rippmann F; Schneider G
J Comput Chem; 2011 Jun; 32(8):1618-34. PubMed ID: 21328404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
