These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22360847)

  • 1. Discussing study limitations in reports of biomedical studies- the need for more transparency.
    Puhan MA; Akl EA; Bryant D; Xie F; Apolone G; ter Riet G
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2012 Feb; 10():23. PubMed ID: 22360847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reporting guidelines for health research: protocol for a cross-sectional analysis of the EQUATOR Network Library.
    Catalá-López F; Alonso-Arroyo A; Page MJ; Hutton B; Ridao M; Tabarés-Seisdedos R; Aleixandre-Benavent R; Moher D
    BMJ Open; 2019 Mar; 9(3):e022769. PubMed ID: 30837245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rules to be adopted for publishing a scientific paper.
    Picardi N
    Ann Ital Chir; 2016; 87():1-3. PubMed ID: 28474609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting guidelines: doing better for readers.
    Moher D
    BMC Med; 2018 Dec; 16(1):233. PubMed ID: 30545364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals.
    Galipeau J; Barbour V; Baskin P; Bell-Syer S; Cobey K; Cumpston M; Deeks J; Garner P; MacLehose H; Shamseer L; Straus S; Tugwell P; Wager E; Winker M; Moher D
    BMC Med; 2016 Feb; 14():16. PubMed ID: 26837937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Getting published well requires fulfilling editors' and reviewers' needs and desires.
    Schoenwolf GC
    Dev Growth Differ; 2013 Dec; 55(9):735-43. PubMed ID: 24131034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact Factors and Prediction of Popular Topics in a Journal.
    Nielsen MB; Seitz K
    Ultraschall Med; 2016 Aug; 37(4):343-5. PubMed ID: 27490462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 'How to count sperm properly': checklist for acceptability of studies based on human semen analysis.
    Björndahl L; Barratt CL; Mortimer D; Jouannet P
    Hum Reprod; 2016 Feb; 31(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 26682580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ethical aspects and dilemmas of preparing, writing and publishing of the scientific papers in the biomedical journals.
    Masic I
    Acta Inform Med; 2012 Sep; 20(3):141-8. PubMed ID: 23322969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
    Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
    J Neurosci Res; 2019 Apr; 97(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 30506706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theoretical report: reflections and considerations for authors, reviewers, and editors.
    Souza Filho BAB; Tritany ÉF; Struchiner CJ
    Rev Saude Publica; 2022; 56():30. PubMed ID: 35476108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Editorial policy of Magnesium Research: general considerations on the quality criteria for biomedical papers and some complementary guidelines for the contributors of Magnesium Research. Society for the Development on Magnesium Research.
    Durlach J
    Magnes Res; 1995 Sep; 8(3):191-206. PubMed ID: 8845283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Peer review in medical journals: Beyond quality of reports towards transparency and public scrutiny of the process.
    Vercellini P; Buggio L; Viganò P; Somigliana E
    Eur J Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 31():15-9. PubMed ID: 27129625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Conflicting interests involved in the process of publishing in biomedical journals.
    Igi R
    J BUON; 2015; 20(5):1373-7. PubMed ID: 26537088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Truth in Science Publishing: A Personal Perspective.
    Südhof TC
    PLoS Biol; 2016 Aug; 14(8):e1002547. PubMed ID: 27564858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Did the reporting of prognostic studies of tumour markers improve since the introduction of REMARK guideline? A comparison of reporting in published articles.
    Sekula P; Mallett S; Altman DG; Sauerbrei W
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178531. PubMed ID: 28614415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality of scientific articles.
    Szklo M
    Rev Saude Publica; 2006 Aug; 40 Spec no.():30-5. PubMed ID: 16924300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016 Statement.
    Tate RL; Perdices M; Rosenkoetter U; Shadish W; Vohra S; Barlow DH; Horner R; Kazdin A; Kratochwill T; McDonald S; Sampson M; Shamseer L; Togher L; Albin R; Backman C; Douglas J; Evans JJ; Gast D; Manolov R; Mitchell G; Nickels L; Nikles J; Ownsworth T; Rose M; Schmid CH; Wilson B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 May; 73():142-52. PubMed ID: 27101888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Academic nightmares: Predatory publishing.
    Van Nuland SE; Rogers KA
    Anat Sci Educ; 2017 Jul; 10(4):392-394. PubMed ID: 27911990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.