BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22361901)

  • 21. Understanding incidental findings in the context of genetics and genomics.
    Cho MK
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):280-5, 212. PubMed ID: 18547195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
    Wolf SM; Lawrenz FP; Nelson CA; Kahn JP; Cho MK; Clayton EW; Fletcher JG; Georgieff MK; Hammerschmidt D; Hudson K; Illes J; Kapur V; Keane MA; Koenig BA; Leroy BS; McFarland EG; Paradise J; Parker LS; Terry SF; Van Ness B; Wilfond BS
    J Law Med Ethics; 2008; 36(2):219-48, 211. PubMed ID: 18547191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. DNA donor rights affirmed.
    Hayden EC
    Nature; 2012 Mar; 483(7390):387. PubMed ID: 22437587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Do researchers have an obligation to actively look for genetic incidental findings?
    Gliwa C; Berkman BE
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(2):32-42. PubMed ID: 23391059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Should researchers disclose results to descendants?
    Rothstein MA
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(10):64-5. PubMed ID: 24024818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What does the duty to warn require?
    Shah SK; Hull SC; Spinner MA; Berkman BE; Sanchez LA; Abdul-Karim R; Hsu AP; Claypool R; Holland SM
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(10):62-3. PubMed ID: 24024817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Exploring concordance and discordance for return of incidental findings from clinical sequencing.
    Green RC; Berg JS; Berry GT; Biesecker LG; Dimmock DP; Evans JP; Grody WW; Hegde MR; Kalia S; Korf BR; Krantz I; McGuire AL; Miller DT; Murray MF; Nussbaum RL; Plon SE; Rehm HL; Jacob HJ
    Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):405-10. PubMed ID: 22422049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Return of individual research results from genome-wide association studies: experience of the Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE) Network.
    Fullerton SM; Wolf WA; Brothers KB; Clayton EW; Crawford DC; Denny JC; Greenland P; Koenig BA; Leppig KA; Lindor NM; McCarty CA; McGuire AL; McPeek Hinz ER; Mirel DB; Ramos EM; Ritchie MD; Smith ME; Waudby CJ; Burke W; Jarvik GP
    Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):424-31. PubMed ID: 22361898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Attitudes of the general public towards the disclosure of individual research results and incidental findings from biobank genomic research in Australia.
    Fleming J; Critchley C; Otlowski M; Stewart C; Kerridge I
    Intern Med J; 2015 Dec; 45(12):1274-9. PubMed ID: 26390363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Engaging children in genomics research: decoding the meaning of assent in research.
    Wilfond BS; Diekema DS
    Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):437-43. PubMed ID: 22323071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Broadening research consent in the era of genome-informed medicine.
    Kronenthal C; Delaney SK; Christman MF
    Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):432-6. PubMed ID: 22422050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Biobanks: Validate gene findings before telling donors.
    Hansson MG
    Nature; 2012 Apr; 484(7395):455. PubMed ID: 22538599
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research.
    Black L; Avard D; Zawati MH; Knoppers BM; Hébert J; Sauvageau G;
    Clin Genet; 2013 Nov; 84(5):397-406. PubMed ID: 23662709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationships matter: ethical considerations for returning results to family members of deceased subjects.
    Milner LC; Liu EY; Garrison NA
    Am J Bioeth; 2013; 13(10):66-7. PubMed ID: 24024819
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Incidental findings: a common law approach.
    Tovino SA
    Account Res; 2008; 15(4):242-61. PubMed ID: 18972265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Clinical utility and full disclosure of genetic results to research participants.
    Sharp RR; Foster MW
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):42-4; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085408
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. One size does not fit all.
    Facio FM
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):40-2; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085407
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Searching for secondary findings: considering actionability and preserving the right not to know.
    Isidor B; Julia S; Saugier-Veber P; Weil-Dubuc PL; Bézieau S; Bieth E; Bonnefont JP; Munnich A; Bourdeaut F; Bourgain C; Chassaing N; Corradini N; Haye D; Plaisancie J; Dupin-Deguine D; Calvas P; Mignot C; Cogné B; Manouvrier S; Pasquier L; Héron D; Boycott KM; Turrini M; Vears DF; Nizon M; Vincent M
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2019 Oct; 27(10):1481-1484. PubMed ID: 31186543
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Ethical considerations in the communication of unexpected information with clinical implications.
    Lavieri RR; Garner SA
    Am J Bioeth; 2006; 6(6):46-8; author reply W10-2. PubMed ID: 17085410
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Taxonomizing, sizing, and overcoming the incidentalome.
    Kohane IS; Hsing M; Kong SW
    Genet Med; 2012 Apr; 14(4):399-404. PubMed ID: 22323072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.