BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22362917)

  • 1. Assessment of adverse events in medical care: lack of consistency between experienced teams using the global trigger tool.
    Schildmeijer K; Nilsson L; Arestedt K; Perk J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2012 Apr; 21(4):307-14. PubMed ID: 22362917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of the global trigger tool to measure, monitor and evaluate patient safety in cancer patients: reliability concerns are raised.
    Mattsson TO; Knudsen JL; Lauritsen J; Brixen K; Herrstedt J
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2013 Jul; 22(7):571-9. PubMed ID: 23447657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The inter-rater agreement of retrospective assessments of adverse events does not improve with two reviewers per patient record.
    Zegers M; de Bruijne MC; Wagner C; Groenewegen PP; van der Wal G; de Vet HC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Jan; 63(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 19473812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is inter-rater reliability of Global Trigger Tool results altered when members of the review team are replaced?
    Mevik K; Griffin FA; Hansen TE; Deilkås E; Vonen B
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Sep; 28(4):492-6. PubMed ID: 27283442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Measuring hospital adverse events: assessing inter-rater reliability and trigger performance of the Global Trigger Tool.
    Naessens JM; O'Byrne TJ; Johnson MG; Vansuch MB; McGlone CM; Huddleston JM
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2010 Aug; 22(4):266-74. PubMed ID: 20534607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of the reliability of the IHI Global Trigger Tool: new perspectives from a Brazilian study.
    Moraes SM; Ferrari TCA; Figueiredo NMP; Almeida TNC; Sampaio CCL; Andrade YCP; Benedito RO; Beleigoli AM
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2021 Mar; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 33676370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does adding an appended oncology module to the Global Trigger Tool increase its value?
    Mattsson TO; Knudsen JL; Brixen K; Herrstedt J
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2014 Oct; 26(5):553-60. PubMed ID: 25080549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adverse events are common on the intensive care unit: results from a structured record review.
    Nilsson L; Pihl A; Tågsjö M; Ericsson E
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 2012 Sep; 56(8):959-65. PubMed ID: 22571769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Detection of adverse events in an acute geriatric hospital over a 6-year period using the Global Trigger Tool.
    Suarez C; Menendez MD; Alonso J; Castaño N; Alonso M; Vazquez F
    J Am Geriatr Soc; 2014 May; 62(5):896-900. PubMed ID: 24697662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of adverse events in surgical patients using the Trigger Tool approach.
    Griffin FA; Classen DC
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2008 Aug; 17(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 18678721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The accuracy of the Global Trigger Tool is higher for the identification of adverse events of greater harm: a diagnostic test study.
    Moraes SM; Ferrari TCA; Beleigoli A
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2023 Feb; 34(1):. PubMed ID: 36715067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is a modified Global Trigger Tool method using automatic trigger identification valid when measuring adverse events?
    Mevik K; Hansen TE; Deilkås EC; Ringdal AM; Vonen B
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2019 Aug; 31(7):535-540. PubMed ID: 30295829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Exploring similarities and differences in hospital adverse event rates between Norway and Sweden using Global Trigger Tool.
    Deilkås ET; Risberg MB; Haugen M; Lindstrøm JC; Nylén U; Rutberg H; Michael S
    BMJ Open; 2017 Mar; 7(3):e012492. PubMed ID: 28320786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Identification of adverse events at an orthopedics department in Sweden.
    Unbeck M; Muren O; Lillkrona U
    Acta Orthop; 2008 Jun; 79(3):396-403. PubMed ID: 18622845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient safety in developing countries: retrospective estimation of scale and nature of harm to patients in hospital.
    Wilson RM; Michel P; Olsen S; Gibberd RW; Vincent C; El-Assady R; Rasslan O; Qsous S; Macharia WM; Sahel A; Whittaker S; Abdo-Ali M; Letaief M; Ahmed NA; Abdellatif A; Larizgoitia I;
    BMJ; 2012 Mar; 344():e832. PubMed ID: 22416061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Detecting adverse events in Thai hospitals using medical record reviews: agreement among reviewers.
    Kessomboon P; Panarunothai S; Wongkanaratanakul P
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Oct; 88(10):1412-8. PubMed ID: 16519388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Development of a trigger tool to identify adverse events and no-harm incidents that affect patients admitted to home healthcare.
    Lindblad M; Schildmeijer K; Nilsson L; Ekstedt M; Unbeck M
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2018 Jul; 27(7):502-511. PubMed ID: 28971884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the IHI Global Trigger Tool in measuring the adverse event rate in a Turkish healthcare setting.
    Kurutkan MN; Usta E; Orhan F; Simsekler MC
    Int J Risk Saf Med; 2015; 27(1):11-21. PubMed ID: 25766063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety on an inpatient pediatric otolaryngology service: many small errors, few adverse events.
    Shah RK; Lander L; Forbes P; Jenkins K; Healy GB; Roberson DW
    Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):871-9. PubMed ID: 19358191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.