These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22363302)

  • 1. The frozen face effect: why static photographs may not do you justice.
    Post RB; Haberman J; Iwaki L; Whitney D
    Front Psychol; 2012; 3():22. PubMed ID: 22363302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Frozen Effect: Objects in motion are more aesthetically appealing than objects frozen in time.
    McDowell MG; Haberman J
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(5):e0215813. PubMed ID: 31095600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facial attractiveness ratings from video-clips and static images tell the same story.
    Rhodes G; Lie HC; Thevaraja N; Taylor L; Iredell N; Curran C; Tan SQ; Carnemolla P; Simmons LW
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(11):e26653. PubMed ID: 22096491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Perception of facial attractiveness from static and dynamic stimuli.
    Kościński K
    Perception; 2013; 42(2):163-75. PubMed ID: 23700955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion facilitates face perception across changes in viewpoint and expression in older adults.
    Maguinness C; Newell FN
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2266-80. PubMed ID: 25328999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Revisiting the earliest electrophysiological correlate of familiar face recognition.
    Huang W; Wu X; Hu L; Wang L; Ding Y; Qu Z
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2017 Oct; 120():42-53. PubMed ID: 28684327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Learning the moves: the effect of familiarity and facial motion on person recognition across large changes in viewing format.
    Roark DA; O'Toole AJ; Abdi H; Barrett SE
    Perception; 2006; 35(6):761-73. PubMed ID: 16836043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use and Usefulness of Dynamic Face Stimuli for Face Perception Studies-a Review of Behavioral Findings and Methodology.
    Dobs K; Bülthoff I; Schultz J
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1355. PubMed ID: 30123162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociable pathways for moving and static face perception begin in early visual cortex: Evidence from an acquired prosopagnosic.
    Sliwinska MW; Bearpark C; Corkhill J; McPhillips A; Pitcher D
    Cortex; 2020 Sep; 130():327-339. PubMed ID: 32736196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus factors affecting the categorisation of faces and scrambled faces.
    Donnelly N; Humphreys GW; Sawyer J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1994 May; 85(3):219-34. PubMed ID: 8036942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Recognizing people from dynamic and static faces and bodies: dissecting identity with a fusion approach.
    O'Toole AJ; Phillips PJ; Weimer S; Roark DA; Ayyad J; Barwick R; Dunlop J
    Vision Res; 2011 Jan; 51(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 20969886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Exploiting Images for Video Recognition: Heterogeneous Feature Augmentation via Symmetric Adversarial Learning.
    Yu F; Wu X; Chen J; Duan L
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2019 Nov; 28(11):5308-5321. PubMed ID: 31144637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Social perception in autism spectrum disorders: impaired category selectivity for dynamic but not static images in ventral temporal cortex.
    Weisberg J; Milleville SC; Kenworthy L; Wallace GL; Gotts SJ; Beauchamp MS; Martin A
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jan; 24(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 23019245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Detecting personal familiarity depends on static frames in "thin slices" of behavior.
    Saville A; Balas B
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1537-43. PubMed ID: 24683099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Matching voice and face identity from static images.
    Mavica LW; Barenholtz E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):307-12. PubMed ID: 23276114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence for a size underestimation of upright faces.
    Araragi Y; Aotani T; Kitaoka A
    Perception; 2012; 41(7):840-53. PubMed ID: 23155735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contribution of the body and motion to whole person recognition.
    Simhi N; Yovel G
    Vision Res; 2016 May; 122():12-20. PubMed ID: 26980375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women Walk in High Heels: Lumbar Curvature, Dynamic Motion Stimuli and Attractiveness.
    Meskó N; Őry F; Csányi E; Juhász L; Szilágyi G; Lubics O; Putz Á; Láng A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jan; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33401569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The many faces of a face: Comparing stills and videos of facial expressions in eight dimensions (SAVE database).
    Garrido MV; Lopes D; Prada M; Rodrigues D; Jerónimo R; Mourão RP
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Aug; 49(4):1343-1360. PubMed ID: 27573005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A naturalistic viewing paradigm using 360° panoramic video clips and real-time field-of-view changes with eye-gaze tracking.
    Kim HC; Jin S; Jo S; Lee JH
    Neuroimage; 2020 Aug; 216():116617. PubMed ID: 32057996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.