These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22363357)

  • 41. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K; Iplikçioğlu H; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement.
    Palacios RP; Johnson GH; Phillips KM; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Aug; 96(2):104-14. PubMed ID: 16911887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Tensile bond strengths of five luting agents to two CAD-CAM restorative materials and enamel.
    Chang JC; Hart DA; Estey AW; Chan JT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jul; 90(1):18-23. PubMed ID: 12869970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Crown retention with three resin-modified glass ionomer luting agents.
    Pameijer CH
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Nov; 143(11):1218-22. PubMed ID: 23115151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of thermocycling on the retention of various cements of one-unit and three-unit fixed implant-supported restorations.
    Uludamar A; Ozkan Y; Ozkan YK
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):567-76. PubMed ID: 22616050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Retentiveness of various luting agents used with implant-supported prostheses: a preliminary in vitro study.
    Garg P; Gupta G; Prithviraj DR; Pujari M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(1):82-4. PubMed ID: 23342339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
    Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Undetected Excess Cement at Marginal Areas of Zirconia Crown Copings: In Vitro Analysis of Two Luting Agents and Their Influence on Retention.
    Augusti D; Augusti G; Re D
    Int J Prosthodont; 2020; 33(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 32069345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of Cement Type and Cementation Technique on the Retention of Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Zeinabadi Z; Nami M; Naserkhaki M; Tavakolizadeh S
    J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2020; 30(1):61-67. PubMed ID: 33389917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of Luting Cements On the Bond Strength to Turkom-Cera All-Ceramic Material.
    Al-Makramani BMA; Razak AAA; Abu-Hassan MI; Al-Sanabani FA; Albakri FM
    Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2018 Mar; 6(3):548-553. PubMed ID: 29610618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
    Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparative evaluation of microleakage of metallic copings luted with three different commercially available luting cements: An
    Handa M; Marya P; Gupta V; Chopra S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 33835069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Misfit and microleakage of implant-supported crown copings obtained by laser sintering and casting techniques, luted with glass-ionomer, resin cements and acrylic/urethane-based agents.
    Castillo-Oyagüe R; Lynch CD; Turrión AS; López-Lozano JF; Torres-Lagares D; Suárez-García MJ
    J Dent; 2013 Jan; 41(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 23022105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Vertical marginal discrepancy of ceramic copings with different ceramic materials, finish lines, and luting agents: an in vitro evaluation.
    Quintas AF; Oliveira F; Bottino MA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2004 Sep; 92(3):250-7. PubMed ID: 15343160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. In vitro comparisons of casting retention on implant abutments among commercially available and experimental castor oil-containing dental luting agents.
    Pinelli LA; Fais LM; Ricci WA; Reis JM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 May; 109(5):319-24. PubMed ID: 23684282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effect of airborne-particle abrasion on retentive strength in overtapered fixed prosthodontic restorations.
    Gurbuz A; Inan O; Kaplan R; Ozturk AN
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Mar; 39(3):e134-8. PubMed ID: 18618029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The effect of air abrasion of metal implant abutments on the tensile bond strength of three luting agents used to cement implant superstructures: an in vitro study.
    Jugdev J; Borzabadi-Farahani A; Lynch E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):784-90. PubMed ID: 25032757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns.
    Ayad MF; Rosenstiel SF; Salama M
    J Prosthet Dent; 1997 Feb; 77(2):116-21. PubMed ID: 9051596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Use of luting agents with an implant system: Part I.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Bogacki MT; Tietge JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 Nov; 68(5):737-41. PubMed ID: 1432793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Retention of zirconia on titanium in two-piece abutments with self-adhesive resin cements.
    Mehl C; Zhang Q; Lehmann F; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):214-219. PubMed ID: 29627210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.