312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22364372)
1. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists.
Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Schmutz F; Trottmann A; Roos M; Hämmerle CH
Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Jan; 71(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 22364372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains.
Preis V; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Hahnel S; Handel G; Rosentritt M
Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 21524788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The wear of polished and glazed zirconia against enamel.
Janyavula S; Lawson N; Cakir D; Beck P; Ramp LC; Burgess JO
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 23328193
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Wear of enamel opposing zirconia and lithium disilicate after adjustment, polishing and glazing.
Lawson NC; Janyavula S; Syklawer S; McLaren EA; Burgess JO
J Dent; 2014 Dec; 42(12):1586-91. PubMed ID: 25257823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-body wear potential of dental yttrium-stabilized zirconia ceramic after grinding, polishing, and glazing treatments.
Amer R; Kürklü D; Kateeb E; Seghi RR
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1151-5. PubMed ID: 24836531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study.
Sripetchdanond J; Leevailoj C
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Nov; 112(5):1141-50. PubMed ID: 24980740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Antagonist wear of three CAD/CAM anatomic contour zirconia ceramics.
Park JH; Park S; Lee K; Yun KD; Lim HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jan; 111(1):20-9. PubMed ID: 24199603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wear behavior of dental Y-TZP ceramic against natural enamel after different finishing procedures.
Mitov G; Heintze SD; Walz S; Woll K; Muecklich F; Pospiech P
Dent Mater; 2012 Aug; 28(8):909-18. PubMed ID: 22608163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wear analysis and topographical properties of monolithic zirconia and CoCr against human enamel after polishing and glazing procedures.
Fontolliet A; Al-Haj Husain N; Özcan M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 May; 105():103712. PubMed ID: 32279854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments.
Preis V; Behr M; Handel G; Schneider-Feyrer S; Hahnel S; Rosentritt M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jun; 10():13-22. PubMed ID: 22520415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An evaluation of wear when enamel is opposed by various ceramic materials and gold.
Elmaria A; Goldstein G; Vijayaraghavan T; Legeros RZ; Hittelman EL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Nov; 96(5):345-53. PubMed ID: 17098498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.
Olivera AB; Matson E; Marques MM
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 17165291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cycle-dependent in vitro wear performance of dental ceramics after clinical surface treatments.
Preis V; Grumser K; Schneider-Feyrer S; Behr M; Rosentritt M
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jan; 53():49-58. PubMed ID: 26313248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments.
Preis V; Weiser F; Handel G; Rosentritt M
Quintessence Int; 2013 May; 44(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 23479579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative Evaluation of Wear of Natural Enamel Antagonist Against Glazed Monolithic Zirconia Crowns and Polished Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: An In Vivo Study.
Dondani JR; Pardeshi V; Gangurde A; Shaikh A; Mahule A; Deval P
Int J Prosthodont; 2023; 36(3):273–281. PubMed ID: 35998079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in vitro investigation into the wear effects of unglazed, glazed, and polished porcelain on human enamel.
Jagger DC; Harrison A
J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Sep; 72(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 7965907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of hydrofluoric acid surface treatment and bond strength of a zirconia veneering ceramic.
Chaiyabutr Y; McGowan S; Phillips KM; Kois JC; Giordano RA
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 100(3):194-202. PubMed ID: 18762031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro performance of full-contour zirconia single crowns.
Beuer F; Stimmelmayr M; Gueth JF; Edelhoff D; Naumann M
Dent Mater; 2012 Apr; 28(4):449-56. PubMed ID: 22196898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Enamel wear against monolithic zirconia restorations: A meta-analysis and systematic review of in vitro studies.
Aljomard YRM; Altunok EÇ; Kara HB
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Apr; 34(3):473-489. PubMed ID: 34623015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative study of the wear of dental alloys against monolithic zirconia.
Cha MS; Huh YH; Cho LR; Park CJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jun; 123(6):866-873. PubMed ID: 31653400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
