These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22364372)

  • 21. Comparison of four monolithic zirconia materials with conventional ones: Contrast ratio, grain size, four-point flexural strength and two-body wear.
    Stawarczyk B; Frevert K; Ender A; Roos M; Sener B; Wimmer T
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Jun; 59():128-138. PubMed ID: 26751707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of aging on the wear performance of monolithic zirconia.
    Badarneh A; Eun Choi JJ; Lyons K; Porter G; Waddell N; Chun Li K
    Dent Mater; 2022 May; 38(5):e136-e146. PubMed ID: 35430107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparative evaluation of enamel wear against monolithic zirconia and layered zirconia after polishing and glazing: An
    Shaik K; Reddy KM; Shastry YM; Aditya SV; Babu PJK
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2022; 22(4):354-360. PubMed ID: 36511069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Surface properties of monolithic zirconia after dental adjustment treatments and in vitro wear simulation.
    Preis V; Schmalzbauer M; Bougeard D; Schneider-Feyrer S; Rosentritt M
    J Dent; 2015 Jan; 43(1):133-9. PubMed ID: 25174949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enamel wear of modified porcelains.
    Imai Y; Suzuki S; Fukushima S
    Am J Dent; 2000 Dec; 13(6):315-23. PubMed ID: 11764126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; De Angelis F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 26553254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of glazed and polished surface finishes on the friction coefficient of two low-fusing ceramics.
    Schuh C; Kinast EJ; Mezzomo E; Kapczinski MP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Mar; 93(3):245-52. PubMed ID: 15775925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Enamel wear caused by monolithic zirconia crowns after 6 months of clinical use.
    Stober T; Bermejo JL; Rammelsberg P; Schmitter M
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Apr; 41(4):314-22. PubMed ID: 24447258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Johnston W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 25957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains.
    Kim MJ; Oh SH; Kim JH; Ju SW; Seo DG; Jun SH; Ahn JS; Ryu JJ
    J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):979-88. PubMed ID: 22892464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of surface finishes on the flexural strength and fracture toughness of In-Ceram Zirconia.
    Manawi M; Ozcan M; Madina M; Cura C; Valandro LF
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 22414507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The progressive wear and abrasiveness of novel graded glass/zirconia materials relative to their dental ceramic counterparts.
    Kaizer MR; Moraes RR; Cava SS; Zhang Y
    Dent Mater; 2019 May; 35(5):763-771. PubMed ID: 30827797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical study to evaluate the wear of natural enamel antagonist to zirconia and metal ceramic crowns.
    Mundhe K; Jain V; Pruthi G; Shah N
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 25985742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Two-body wear performance of dental colored zirconia after different surface treatments.
    Bai Y; Zhao J; Si W; Wang X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Oct; 116(4):584-590. PubMed ID: 27157606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Randomized clinical study of wear of enamel antagonists against polished monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Kim MJ; Hsu SM; Abdulhameed N; Jenkins R; Neal D; Ren F; Clark AE
    J Dent; 2018 Jan; 68():19-27. PubMed ID: 29042241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The abrasive effect of glazed, unglazed, and polished porcelain on the wear of human enamel, and the influence of carbonated soft drinks on the rate of wear.
    al-Hiyasat AS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Smith GM; Gilmour WH
    Int J Prosthodont; 1997; 10(3):269-82. PubMed ID: 9484060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Two-body wear of dental porcelain and substructure oxide ceramics.
    Rosentritt M; Preis V; Behr M; Hahnel S; Handel G; Kolbeck C
    Clin Oral Investig; 2012 Jun; 16(3):935-43. PubMed ID: 21739199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Two-body wear test of enamel against laboratory polished and clinically adjusted zirconia.
    Mehzabeen KR; Boughton P; Kan WH; Ruys AJ; Guazzato M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Aug; 108():103760. PubMed ID: 32469712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of different dental ceramic systems on the wear of human enamel: An in vitro study.
    Zandparsa R; El Huni RM; Hirayama H; Johnson MI
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Feb; 115(2):230-7. PubMed ID: 26548885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Wear of ceramic and antagonist--a systematic evaluation of influencing factors in vitro.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Forjanic M; Zellweger G; Rousson V
    Dent Mater; 2008 Apr; 24(4):433-49. PubMed ID: 17720238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.