These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22364624)

  • 1. [Results obtained after robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy for the management of urogenital prolapse: a review].
    Seisen T; Vaessen C; Yates DR; Parra J; Bourgade V; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2012 Mar; 22(3):146-53. PubMed ID: 22364624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective comparison of short-term functional outcomes obtained after pure laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Seror J; Yates DR; Seringe E; Vaessen C; Bitker MO; Chartier-Kastler E; Rouprêt M
    World J Urol; 2012 Jun; 30(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 21858540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of functional outcomes with purely laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy in obese women.
    Joubert M; Thubert T; Lefranc JP; Vaessen C; Chartier-Kastler É; Deffieux X; Rouprêt M
    Prog Urol; 2014 Dec; 24(17):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25450756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The 26-Minute Laparoscopic Sacral Colpopexy: Do We Really Need Robotic Technology?
    Miklos JR; Moore RD
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(5):712. PubMed ID: 25769671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-minimization analysis of robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    Judd JP; Siddiqui NY; Barnett JC; Visco AG; Havrilesky LJ; Wu JM
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20621010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Short-term outcomes of robotic versus conventional laparoscopic sacral colpopexy.
    Antosh DD; Grotzke SA; McDonald MA; Shveiky D; Park AJ; Gutman RE; Sokol AI
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 22543767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review and meta-analysis of conventional laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy versus robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
    Pan K; Zhang Y; Wang Y; Wang Y; Xu H
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 Mar; 132(3):284-91. PubMed ID: 26797199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.
    Serati M; Bogani G; Sorice P; Braga A; Torella M; Salvatore S; Uccella S; Cromi A; Ghezzi F
    Eur Urol; 2014 Aug; 66(2):303-18. PubMed ID: 24631406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic approaches to prolapse surgery.
    Rosenblum N
    Curr Opin Urol; 2012 Jul; 22(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 22647648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A review of the current status of laparoscopic and robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Lee RK; Mottrie A; Payne CK; Waltregny D
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jun; 65(6):1128-37. PubMed ID: 24433811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Abdominal approaches to pelvic prolapse repairs.
    Pollard ME; Eilber KS; Anger JT
    Curr Opin Urol; 2013 Jul; 23(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 23673511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: surgical technique and outcomes at a single high-volume institution.
    Ploumidis A; Spinoit AF; De Naeyer G; Schatteman P; Gan M; Ficarra V; Volpe A; Mottrie A
    Eur Urol; 2014 Jan; 65(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 23806518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacral colpopexy: initial experience in a high-volume laparoscopic reference center.
    Xylinas E; Ouzaid I; Durand X; Ploussard G; Salomon L; Gillion N; Vordos D; Hoznek A; Abbou CC; de la Taille A
    J Endourol; 2010 Dec; 24(12):1985-9. PubMed ID: 20932190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of vaginal vault prolapse: with or without robotic assistance.
    Chan SS; Pang SM; Cheung TH; Cheung RY; Chung TK
    Hong Kong Med J; 2011 Feb; 17(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 21282827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as management for pelvic organ prolapse.
    Kramer BA; Whelan CM; Powell TM; Schwartz BF
    J Endourol; 2009 Apr; 23(4):655-8. PubMed ID: 19335154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Robotic-assisted surgery in urogynecology--our experience with the first 100 cases: experience from a single institution].
    Mustafa S; Mustafa M; Burke Y; Nibal AK; Deutsch M; Deutsch M; Lowenstein L
    Harefuah; 2014 Aug; 153(8):448-52, 499. PubMed ID: 25286633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Therapeutic effect of robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse.
    Yin H; Zeng F; Xue M; Tian X
    Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Jun; 45(6):709-714. PubMed ID: 32879129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midterm results of robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy.
    Hach CE; Krude J; Reitz A; Reiter M; Haferkamp A; Buse S
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Sep; 26(9):1321-6. PubMed ID: 25851586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laparoscopic monolateral suspension for vaginal vault prolapse: a report of an exit surgical strategy during sacralcolpopexy.
    Romano F; Sartore A; Mordeglia D; Di Lorenzo G; Stabile G; Ricci G
    BMC Surg; 2020 Sep; 20(1):199. PubMed ID: 32917164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.