These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
25. Robotic/Laparoscopic prolapse repair and the role of hysteropexy: a urology perspective. Burgess KL; Elliott DS Urol Clin North Am; 2012 Aug; 39(3):349-60. PubMed ID: 22877718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The current status of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy: a review. Ganatra AM; Rozet F; Sanchez-Salas R; Barret E; Galiano M; Cathelineau X; Vallancien G Eur Urol; 2009 May; 55(5):1089-103. PubMed ID: 19201521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Uterine preservation in pelvic organ prolapse using robot assisted laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy: quality of life and technique. Mourik SL; Martens JE; Aktas M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Nov; 165(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 22897838 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Long-Term Effectiveness of Uterosacral Colpopexy and Minimally Invasive Sacral Colpopexy for Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse. Unger CA; Barber MD; Walters MD; Paraiso MFR; Ridgeway B; Jelovsek JE Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2017; 23(3):188-194. PubMed ID: 27636212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for stage III pelvic organ prolapse. Louis-Sylvestre C; Herry M Int Urogynecol J; 2013 May; 24(5):731-3. PubMed ID: 23314225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. One-year functional and anatomic outcomes of robotic sacrocolpopexy versus vaginal extraperitoneal colpopexy with mesh. Jambusaria LH; Murphy M; Lucente VR Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(2):87-92. PubMed ID: 25185594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcomes and Postoperative Complications of Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Hysterosacropexy: Initial Experience. Cerruto MA; D'Elia C; Cavicchioli FM; Cavalleri S; Balzarro M; Porcaro AB; Curti P; Artibani W Urol Int; 2015; 95(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 25720418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mid term outcome of robotic mesh sacrocolpopexy. Belsante M; Murray S; Dillon B; Zimmern P Can J Urol; 2013 Feb; 20(1):6656-61. PubMed ID: 23433141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robot-assisted sacrocolpopexy: description and video. Mitchell CR; Gettman M; Chow GK; Elliott D J Endourol; 2012 Dec; 26(12):1596-9. PubMed ID: 23046290 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. McDermott CD; Hale DS Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2009 Sep; 36(3):585-614. PubMed ID: 19932417 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Adoption of robotic sacrocolpopexy at an academic institution. Bradley MS; Kantartzis KL; Lowder JL; Winger D; Wang L; Shepherd JP JSLS; 2014; 18(3):. PubMed ID: 25392622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Streamlined Surgical Approach to Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Post-Hysterectomy Vault Prolapse. Zebede S; Dawood A; Alarab M; Drutz H; Lovatsis D J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2016 May; 38(5):446-52. PubMed ID: 27261220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Minimally invasive apical sacropexy: a retrospective review of laparoscopic and robotic operating room experiences. Pulliam SJ; Weinstein MM; Wakamatsu MM Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 22453324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Long-term results of robotic assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high grade vaginal vault prolapse. Elliott DS; Krambeck AE; Chow GK J Urol; 2006 Aug; 176(2):655-9. PubMed ID: 16813916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]