161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22364715)
1. Stakeholders involvement by HTA Organisations: why is so different?
Cavazza M; Jommi C
Health Policy; 2012 May; 105(2-3):236-45. PubMed ID: 22364715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Involving stakeholders and developing a policy for stakeholder involvement in the European network for health technology assessment, EUnetHTA.
Nielsen CP; Lauritsen SW; Kristensen FB; Bistrup ML; Cecchetti A; Turk E;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():84-91. PubMed ID: 20030895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion and use of health technology assessment in policy making: what lessons for decentralised healthcare systems?
Ciani O; Tarricone R; Torbica A
Health Policy; 2012 Dec; 108(2-3):194-202. PubMed ID: 23093020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. STAKEHOLDER INVOLVEMENT IN HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT AT NATIONAL LEVEL: A STUDY FROM IRAN.
Yazdizadeh B; Shahmoradi S; Majdzadeh R; Doaee S; Bazyar M; Souresrafil A; Olyaeemanesh A
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2016 Jan; 32(3):181-9. PubMed ID: 27524462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Health technology assessment in Denmark: strategy, implementation, and developments.
Sigmund H; Kristensen FB
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():94-101. PubMed ID: 19505351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What medical specialists like and dislike about health technology assessment reports.
Lehoux P; Hivon M; Denis JL; Tailliez S
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2009 Oct; 14(4):197-203. PubMed ID: 19770117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Health technology assessment to optimize health technology utilization: using implementation initiatives and monitoring processes.
Frønsdal KB; Facey K; Klemp M; Norderhaug IN; Mørland B; Røttingen JA
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2010 Jul; 26(3):309-16. PubMed ID: 20584360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical tools and methods for health technology assessment in Europe: structures, methodologies, and tools developed by the European Network for Health Technology Assessment, EUnetHTA.
Kristensen FB; Lampe K; Chase DL; Lee-Robin SH; Wild C; Moharra M; Garrido MV; Nielsen CP; Røttingen JA; Neikter SA; Bistrup ML;
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Dec; 25 Suppl 2():1-8. PubMed ID: 20030885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Integration of health technology assessment recommendations into organizational and clinical practice: A case study in Catalonia.
Gagnon MP; Sánchez E; Pons JM
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 16571192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A determination of topics for health technology assessment in Thailand: making decision makers involved.
Lertpitakpong C; Chaikledkaew U; Thavorncharoensap M; Tantivess S; Praditsitthikorn N; Youngkong S; Yothasamut J; Udomsuk K; Sinthitichai K; Teerawattananon Y
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Jun; 91 Suppl 2():S100-9. PubMed ID: 19253492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reflections on the evolution of health technology assessment in Europe.
Sorenson C; Chalkidou K
Health Econ Policy Law; 2012 Jan; 7(1):25-45. PubMed ID: 22221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The role of HTA in German health care. Do we need impact objectives?].
Gerhardus A
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz; 2006 Mar; 49(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 16453136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Netherlands.
Banta D; Oortwijn WJ
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Jul; 25 Suppl 1():143-7. PubMed ID: 19538813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health technology assessment: research trends and future priorities in Europe.
Nielsen CP; Funch TM; Kristensen FB
J Health Serv Res Policy; 2011 Jul; 16 Suppl 2():6-15. PubMed ID: 21737525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. International comparison and review of a health technology assessment skills program.
Wanke MI; Juzwishin D
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2005; 21(2):253-62. PubMed ID: 15921067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Using health technology assessment to support evidence-based decision-making in Canada: an academic perspective.
Xie F; Bowen JM; Sutherland SC; Burke N; Blackhouse G; Tarride JE; O'Reilly D; Goeree R
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res; 2011 Oct; 11(5):513-21. PubMed ID: 21958096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [How can the impact of Health Technology Assessment (HTA) in the Austrian healthcare system be assessed? Design of a conceptual framework].
Schumacher I; Zechmeister I
Gesundheitswesen; 2012 Apr; 74(4):257-65. PubMed ID: 21267815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Similarities and differences between stakeholders' opinions on using Health Technology Assessment (HTA) information across five European countries: results from the EQUIPT survey.
Vokó Z; Cheung KL; Józwiak-Hagymásy J; Wolfenstetter S; Jones T; Muñoz C; Evers SM; Hiligsmann M; de Vries H; Pokhrel S;
Health Res Policy Syst; 2016 May; 14(1):38. PubMed ID: 27230485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. "It all depends": conceptualizing public involvement in the context of health technology assessment agencies.
Gauvin FP; Abelson J; Giacomini M; Eyles J; Lavis JN
Soc Sci Med; 2010 May; 70(10):1518-26. PubMed ID: 20207061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The analysis of physicians' work: announcing the end of attempts at in vitro fertilization].
Santiago-Delefosse M; Cahen F; Coeffin-Driol C
Encephale; 2003; 29(4 Pt 1):293-305. PubMed ID: 14615699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
