These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22364817)

  • 21. Does the route of administration of misoprostol make a difference? The uterotonic effect and side effects of misoprostol given by different routes after vaginal delivery.
    Chong YS; Chua S; Shen L; Arulkumaran S
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2004 Apr; 113(2):191-8. PubMed ID: 15063959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Foley catheter versus intra-vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor in post-term gestations.
    Kandil M; Emarh M; Sayyed T; Masood A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Aug; 286(2):303-7. PubMed ID: 22434058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Role of misoprostol in overcoming an unsatisfactory colposcopy: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.
    Aggarwal R; Suneja A; Agarwal N; Mishra K
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2006; 62(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 16735793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cervical priming prior to operative hysteroscopy: a randomized comparison of laminaria versus misoprostol.
    Darwish AM; Ahmad AM; Mohammad AM
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Oct; 19(10):2391-4. PubMed ID: 15333607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Intrauterine contraception: attitudes, practice, and knowledge among Swedish health care providers.
    Ekelund M; Melander M; Gemzell-Danielsson K
    Contraception; 2014 May; 89(5):407-12. PubMed ID: 24485096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparative study of the effect of intravaginal misoprostol at 50 and 100 micrograms in cervical ripening and labor induction].
    Reyna-Villasmil E; Guerra-Velásquez M; Torres-Montilla M; Reyna-Villasmil N; Mejia-Montilla J; Labarca-Vincero N
    Invest Clin; 2005 Jun; 46(2):179-86. PubMed ID: 16001749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Vaginal misoprostol prior to insertion of an intrauterine device: an RCT.
    Dijkhuizen K; Dekkers OM; Holleboom CA; de Groot CJ; Hellebrekers BW; van Roosmalen GJ; Janssen CA; Helmerhorst FM
    Hum Reprod; 2011 Feb; 26(2):323-9. PubMed ID: 21159683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Follow-up visits to check strings after intrauterine contraceptive placement cannot predict or prevent future expulsion.
    Bahamondes L; Monteiro I; Fernandes A; Gaffield ME
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2019 Apr; 24(2):97-101. PubMed ID: 30870042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term.
    Hassan AA
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Management of Intrauterine Contraception in Early Pregnancy.
    Ramesh SS; Charm S; Kalinowski A; Liberty AL; Stuart GS
    South Med J; 2017 Aug; 110(8):550-553. PubMed ID: 28771655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Votipka JR
    J Fam Pract; 1997 Jul; 45(1):20. PubMed ID: 9228905
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effectiveness and safety of a new vaginal misoprostol product specifically labeled for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Cecatti JG; Tedesco RP; Pires HM; Calderon IM; Faúndes A
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(6):706-11. PubMed ID: 16752263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Self-administration of misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion among nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial.
    Lathrop E; Haddad L; McWhorter CP; Goedken P
    Contraception; 2013 Dec; 88(6):725-9. PubMed ID: 24034580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effect of vaginal pH on efficacy of misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Ogburn PL; Harris DY; Heise RH; Ramin KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1616-9. PubMed ID: 10871486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Cervical softening with vaginal misoprostol before hysterosalpingography.
    Li YT; Chen TH; Kuo TC
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Sep; 134(1):130-1. PubMed ID: 16934383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A randomized comparison of vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for cervical priming in nulliparous women before operative hysteroscopy.
    Preutthipan S; Herabutya Y
    Fertil Steril; 2006 Oct; 86(4):990-4. PubMed ID: 16949590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Vaginal misoprostol prior to diagnostic hysteroscopy in patients of reproductive age: a randomized clinical trial.
    Valente EP; de Amorim MM; Costa AA; de Miranda DV
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(4):452-8. PubMed ID: 18539093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of vaginal pH on the efficacy of vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor.
    Gunalp S; Bildirici I
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Apr; 79(4):283-5. PubMed ID: 10746843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of prophylactic misoprostol administration prior to intrauterine device insertion in nulliparous women.
    Edelman AB; Schaefer E; Olson A; Van Houten L; Bednarek P; Leclair C; Jensen JT
    Contraception; 2011 Sep; 84(3):234-9. PubMed ID: 21843686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.