954 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22365084)
1. Visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for low to moderate myopia.
Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shimizu K; Matsumura K; Komatsu M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 153(6):1178-86.e1. PubMed ID: 22365084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Visual performance after implantable collamer lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopia.
Igarashi A; Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Komatsu M
Am J Ophthalmol; 2009 Jul; 148(1):164-70.e1. PubMed ID: 19375059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraindividual comparison of visual performance after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens with and without a central hole implantation for moderate to high myopia.
Shimizu K; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Shiratani T
Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 Sep; 154(3):486-494.e1. PubMed ID: 22818905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of higher order aberrations after implantable Collamer Lens implantation and wavefront-guided LASEK in high myopia.
Shin JY; Ahn H; Seo KY; Kim EK; Kim TI
J Refract Surg; 2012 Feb; 28(2):106-11. PubMed ID: 22074464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of visual acuity, higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity after refractive lenticule extraction and wavefront-guided laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Kobashi H; Komatsu M
Br J Ophthalmol; 2013 Aug; 97(8):968-75. PubMed ID: 23269682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term quality of life after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation and after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia.
Kobashi H; Kamiya K; Igarashi A; Matsumura K; Komatsu M; Shimizu K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Dec; 40(12):2019-24. PubMed ID: 25447196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Visual outcomes after wavefront-guided photorefractive keratectomy and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: Prospective comparison.
Moshirfar M; Schliesser JA; Chang JC; Oberg TJ; Mifflin MD; Townley R; Livingston MK; Kurz CJ
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2010 Aug; 36(8):1336-43. PubMed ID: 20656157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis for patients with myopia: a prospective randomized contralateral eye study.
He L; Liu A; Manche EE
Am J Ophthalmol; 2014 Jun; 157(6):1170-1178.e1. PubMed ID: 24560995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of Collamer toric implantable [corrected] contact lens implantation and wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for high myopic astigmatism.
Kamiya K; Shimizu K; Igarashi A; Komatsu M
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2008 Oct; 34(10):1687-93. PubMed ID: 18812119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Optical and visual simulation of standard and modified spherical aberration implantable Collamer lens post myopic LASIK surgery.
Pérez-Vives C; Belda-Salmerón L; García-Lázaro S; Ferrer-Blasco T; Montés-Micó R
Eur J Ophthalmol; 2014; 24(3):330-7. PubMed ID: 24057938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Wavefront-optimized ablation versus topography-guided customized ablation in myopic LASIK: comparative study of higher order aberrations.
El Awady HE; Ghanem AA; Saleh SM
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2011; 42(4):314-20. PubMed ID: 21534496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of higher-order aberrations and corneal asphericity between wavefront-guided and aspheric LASIK for myopia.
Goyal JL; Garg A; Arora R; Jain P; Goel Y
J Refract Surg; 2014 Nov; 30(11):777-84. PubMed ID: 25375851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of pupil diameter on the relation between ocular higher-order aberration and contrast sensitivity after laser in situ keratomileusis.
Oshika T; Tokunaga T; Samejima T; Miyata K; Kawana K; Kaji Y
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Apr; 47(4):1334-8. PubMed ID: 16565365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Astigmatism correction: Laser in situ keratomileusis versus posterior chamber collagen copolymer toric phakic intraocular lens implantation.
Hasegawa A; Kojima T; Isogai N; Tamaoki A; Nakamura T; Ichikawa K
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2012 Apr; 38(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 22321354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing the changes in coma-like aberrations after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis.
Kamiya K; Umeda K; Igarashi A; Ando W; Shimizu K
Curr Eye Res; 2011 Oct; 36(10):905-9. PubMed ID: 21950695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Foldable iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens vs femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia between -6.00 and -9.00 diopters.
Albarrán-Diego C; Muñoz G; Ferrer-Blasco T; García-Lázaro S; Belda-Salmerón L
J Refract Surg; 2012 Jun; 28(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 22589290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis.
Tran DB; Sarayba MA; Bor Z; Garufis C; Duh YJ; Soltes CR; Juhasz T; Kurtz RM
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2005 Jan; 31(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 15721701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of 2 wavefront-guided excimer lasers for myopic laser in situ keratomileusis: one-year results.
Yu CQ; Manche EE
J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Mar; 40(3):412-22. PubMed ID: 24581773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Wavefront-guided versus standard LASIK enhancement for residual refractive errors.
Alió JL; Montés-Mico R
Ophthalmology; 2006 Feb; 113(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16378639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induced Higher-order aberrations after Laser In Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK) Performed with Wavefront-Guided IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in moderate to high Astigmatism.
Al-Zeraid FM; Osuagwu UL
BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Mar; 16():29. PubMed ID: 27000109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
