These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22365232)
1. Comparison and improvements of different Bayesian procedures to integrate external information into genetic evaluations. Vandenplas J; Gengler N J Dairy Sci; 2012 Mar; 95(3):1513-26. PubMed ID: 22365232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Unified method to integrate and blend several, potentially related, sources of information for genetic evaluation. Vandenplas J; Colinet FG; Gengler N Genet Sel Evol; 2014 Sep; 46(1):59. PubMed ID: 25927386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of international dairy sire evaluations from meta-analysis of national estimated breeding values and direct analysis of individual animal performance records. Maltecca C; Bagnato A; Weigel KA J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2599-605. PubMed ID: 15328284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Integration of external estimated breeding values and associated reliabilities using correlations among traits and effects. Vandenplas J; Colinet FG; Glorieux G; Bertozzi C; Gengler N J Dairy Sci; 2015 Dec; 98(12):9044-50. PubMed ID: 26433411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCπ methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbéliarde breeds. Colombani C; Legarra A; Fritz S; Guillaume F; Croiseau P; Ducrocq V; Robert-Granié C J Dairy Sci; 2013 Jan; 96(1):575-91. PubMed ID: 23127905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Major advances in genetic evaluation techniques. Powell RL; Norman HD J Dairy Sci; 2006 Apr; 89(4):1337-48. PubMed ID: 16537965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contribution of domestic production records, Interbull estimated breeding values, and single nucleotide polymorphism genetic markers to the single-step genomic evaluation of milk production. Přibyl J; Madsen P; Bauer J; Přibylová J; Simečková M; Vostrý L; Zavadilová L J Dairy Sci; 2013 Mar; 96(3):1865-73. PubMed ID: 23312993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bayesian single-step genomic evaluations combining local and foreign information in Walloon Holsteins. Colinet FG; Vandenplas J; Vanderick S; Hammami H; Mota RR; Gillon A; Hubin X; Bertozzi C; Gengler N Animal; 2018 May; 12(5):898-905. PubMed ID: 29032781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Joint international evaluation of Milking Shorthorn dairy cattle for production traits. Barrett R; Miglior F; Jansen G; Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3326-36. PubMed ID: 16107423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Genetic evaluation in the presence of uncertain additive relationships. I. Use of phenotypic information to ascertain paternity. Sapp RL; Zhang W; Bertrand JK; Rekaya R J Anim Sci; 2007 Oct; 85(10):2391-400. PubMed ID: 17504957 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of performance records and national breeding values as input into international genetic evaluation. Fikse WF J Dairy Sci; 2004 Aug; 87(8):2709-19. PubMed ID: 15328297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Genomic prediction of simulated multibreed and purebred performance using observed fifty thousand single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes. Kizilkaya K; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ J Anim Sci; 2010 Feb; 88(2):544-51. PubMed ID: 19820059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Application of robust procedures for estimation of breeding values in multiple-trait random regression test-day model. Jamrozik J; Fatehi J; Schaeffer LR J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Feb; 124(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 17302954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Validation of an approximate REML algorithm for parameter estimation in a multitrait, multiple across-country evaluation model: a simulation study. Tarrés J; Liu Z; Ducrocq V; Reinhardt F; Reents R J Dairy Sci; 2007 Oct; 90(10):4846-55. PubMed ID: 17881708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability of direct genomic values for animals with different relationships within and to the reference population. Pszczola M; Strabel T; Mulder HA; Calus MP J Dairy Sci; 2012 Jan; 95(1):389-400. PubMed ID: 22192218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of test-day records beyond three hundred five days for estimation of three hundred five-day breeding values for production traits and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins. Bohmanova J; Miglior F; Jamrozik J J Dairy Sci; 2009 Oct; 92(10):5314-25. PubMed ID: 19762849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Genetic evaluation of dairy cattle with test-day models with autoregressive covariance structures and with a 305-d model. Sawalha RM; Keown JF; Kachman SD; Van Vleck LD J Dairy Sci; 2005 Sep; 88(9):3346-53. PubMed ID: 16107425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Genetic evaluation of Australian dairy cattle for somatic cell scores using multi-trait random regression test-day model. Konstantinov KV; Beard KT; Goddard ME; van der Werf JH J Anim Breed Genet; 2009 Jun; 126(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19646149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Recursive relationships between milk yield and somatic cell score of Canadian Holsteins from finite mixture random regression models. Jamrozik J; Schaeffer LR J Dairy Sci; 2010 Nov; 93(11):5474-86. PubMed ID: 20965363 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]