These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22365559)

  • 1. Wear simulation of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty systems: effect of glenosphere design.
    Vaupel ZM; Baker KC; Kurdziel MD; Wiater JM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Oct; 21(10):1422-9. PubMed ID: 22365559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear rates of highly cross-linked polyethylene humeral liners subjected to alternating cycles of glenohumeral flexion and abduction.
    Peers S; Moravek JE; Budge MD; Newton MD; Kurdziel MD; Baker KC; Wiater JM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Jan; 24(1):143-9. PubMed ID: 25037062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neer Award 2017: wear rates of 32-mm and 40-mm glenospheres in a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty wear simulation model.
    Haggart J; Newton MD; Hartner S; Ho A; Baker KC; Kurdziel MD; Wiater JM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Nov; 26(11):2029-2037. PubMed ID: 28893545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Wear rates of retentive versus nonretentive reverse total shoulder arthroplasty liners in an in vitro wear simulation.
    Carpenter S; Pinkas D; Newton MD; Kurdziel MD; Baker KC; Wiater JM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Sep; 24(9):1372-9. PubMed ID: 25842031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical evaluation of different designs of glenospheres in the SMR reverse total shoulder prosthesis: range of motion and risk of scapular notching.
    Chou J; Malak SF; Anderson IA; Astley T; Poon PC
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2009; 18(3):354-9. PubMed ID: 19393929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Implant Design Variations in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Influence the Required Deltoid Force and Resultant Joint Load.
    Giles JW; Langohr GD; Johnson JA; Athwal GS
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3615-26. PubMed ID: 26310680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. In vitro wear testing of a contemporary design of reverse shoulder prosthesis.
    Smith SL; Li BL; Buniya A; Lin SH; Scholes SC; Johnson G; Joyce TJ
    J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3072-9. PubMed ID: 26278181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observations on retrieved humeral polyethylene components from reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Nam D; Kepler CK; Nho SJ; Craig EV; Warren RF; Wright TM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2010 Oct; 19(7):1003-12. PubMed ID: 20846620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Wear-induced loss of mass in reversed total shoulder arthroplasty with conventional and inverted bearing materials.
    Kohut G; Dallmann F; Irlenbusch U
    J Biomech; 2012 Feb; 45(3):469-73. PubMed ID: 22206827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of scapular notching on reverse shoulder glenoid fixation.
    Roche CP; Stroud NJ; Martin BL; Steiler CA; Flurin PH; Wright TW; DiPaola MJ; Zuckerman JD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Jul; 22(7):963-70. PubMed ID: 23333170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Arthroscopic dynamic analysis of scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
    Boughebri O; Duparc F; Adam JM; Valenti P
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2011 Dec; 97(8):779-84. PubMed ID: 22119510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Augments for Glenoid Wear. Comparison of Posterior Augments to Superior Augments.
    Wright TW; Roche CP; Wright L; Flurin PH; Crosby LA; Zuckerman JD
    Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S124-8. PubMed ID: 26631208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Wear and damage in retrieved humeral inlays of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty-where, how much, and why?
    Mueller U; Harzi A; Loescher R; Buelhoff M; Eckert JA; Kretzer JP
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Aug; 30(8):e517-e530. PubMed ID: 33220411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The influence of humeral head inclination in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.
    Erickson BJ; Frank RM; Harris JD; Mall N; Romeo AA
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Jun; 24(6):988-93. PubMed ID: 25725965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of reverse total shoulder joint forces and glenoid fixation.
    Kwon YW; Forman RE; Walker PS; Zuckerman JD
    Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis; 2010; 68(4):273-80. PubMed ID: 21162705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of humeral component version on impingement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Stephenson DR; Oh JH; McGarry MH; Rick Hatch GF; Lee TQ
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2011 Jun; 20(4):652-8. PubMed ID: 21144775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Activities of daily living with reverse prostheses: importance of scapular compensation for functional mobility of the shoulder.
    Terrier A; Scheuber P; Pioletti DP; Farron A
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Jul; 22(7):948-53. PubMed ID: 23313370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Elucidating trends in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty procedures: a retrieval study evaluating clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes data.
    Wiater BP; Baker EA; Salisbury MR; Koueiter DM; Baker KC; Nolan BM; Wiater JM
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Dec; 24(12):1915-25. PubMed ID: 26212759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of glenoid component design and humeral component retroversion on internal and external rotation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaver study.
    Berhouet J; Garaud P; Favard L
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Dec; 99(8):887-94. PubMed ID: 24211248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An in vitro assessment of wear particulate generated from NUBAC: a PEEK-on-PEEK articulating nucleus replacement device: methodology and results from a series of wear tests using different motion profiles, test frequencies, and environmental conditions.
    Brown T; Bao QB; Agrawal CM; Hallab NJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):E1675-85. PubMed ID: 21494194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.