278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22365627)
1. Evaluation of the accuracy of a 3D surface imaging system for patient setup in head and neck cancer radiotherapy.
Gopan O; Wu Q
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):547-52. PubMed ID: 22365627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The residual setup errors of different IGRT alignment procedures for head and neck IMRT and the resulting dosimetric impact.
Graff P; Kirby N; Weinberg V; Chen J; Yom SS; Lambert L; Pouliot J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 May; 86(1):170-6. PubMed ID: 23245281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of surface registration compared to conventional volumetric registration in patient positioning for head-and-neck radiotherapy: a simulation study using patient data.
Kim Y; Li R; Na YH; Lee R; Xing L
Med Phys; 2014 Dec; 41(12):121701. PubMed ID: 25471948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of low-dose proton CT image registration for pretreatment alignment verification in reference to planning proton CT.
Cassetta R; Piersimoni P; Riboldi M; Giacometti V; Bashkirov V; Baroni G; Ordonez C; Coutrakon G; Schulte R
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Apr; 20(4):83-90. PubMed ID: 30933433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of treatment setup errors between two CT scans for patients with head and neck cancer.
Ezzell LC; Hansen EK; Quivey JM; Xia P
Med Phys; 2007 Aug; 34(8):3233-42. PubMed ID: 17879786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel surrogate to identify anatomical changes during radiotherapy of head and neck cancer patients.
Gros SA; Xu W; Roeske JC; Choi M; Emami B; Surucu M
Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 44(3):924-934. PubMed ID: 28019647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of immobilization on intrafraction motion for spine stereotactic body radiotherapy using cone beam computed tomography.
Li W; Sahgal A; Foote M; Millar BA; Jaffray DA; Letourneau D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Oct; 84(2):520-6. PubMed ID: 22401920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of image-guidance protocols in the treatment of head and neck cancers.
Zeidan OA; Langen KM; Meeks SL; Manon RR; Wagner TH; Willoughby TR; Jenkins DW; Kupelian PA
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):670-7. PubMed ID: 17197123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimal mask immobilization with optical surface guidance for head and neck radiotherapy.
Zhao B; Maquilan G; Jiang S; Schwartz DL
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 19(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 29119677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of overall setup accuracy and adequate setup margins in pelvic image-guided radiotherapy: comparison of the male and female patients.
Laaksomaa M; Kapanen M; Tulijoki T; Peltola S; Hyödynmaa S; Kellokumpu-Lehtinen PL
Med Dosim; 2014; 39(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 24393499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Image guidance during head-and-neck cancer radiation therapy: analysis of alignment trends with in-room cone-beam computed tomography scans.
Zumsteg Z; DeMarco J; Lee SP; Steinberg ML; Lin CS; McBride W; Lin K; Wang PC; Kupelian P; Lee P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):712-9. PubMed ID: 22099037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Linac-based on-board imaging feasibility and the dosimetric consequences of head roll in head-and-neck IMRT plans.
Kim GY; Pawlicki T; Le QT; Luxton G
Med Dosim; 2008; 33(1):93-9. PubMed ID: 18262130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of repositioning accuracy of two commercially available immobilization systems for treatment of head-and-neck tumors using simulation computed tomography imaging.
Rotondo RL; Sultanem K; Lavoie I; Skelly J; Raymond L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2008 Apr; 70(5):1389-96. PubMed ID: 18207659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of interfraction patient setup for head-and-neck cancer intensity modulated radiation therapy using multiple computed tomography-based image guidance.
Qi XS; Hu AY; Lee SP; Lee P; DeMarco J; Li XA; Steinberg ML; Kupelian P; Low D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Jul; 86(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 23474111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of deformed intensity distributions for on-line modification of image-guided IMRT to account for interfractional anatomic changes.
Mohan R; Zhang X; Wang H; Kang Y; Wang X; Liu H; Ang KK; Kuban D; Dong L
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Mar; 61(4):1258-66. PubMed ID: 15752908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Positioning reproducibility with and without rotational corrections for 2 head and neck immobilization systems.
Courneyea L; Mullins J; Howard M; Foote R; Garces Y; Ma D; Beltran C; Brinkmann D; Pafundi D
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(6):e575-81. PubMed ID: 26169225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Local setup reproducibility of the spinal column when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for craniospinal irradiation with patient in supine position.
Stoiber EM; Giske K; Schubert K; Sterzing F; Habl G; Uhl M; Herfarth K; Bendl R; Debus J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Dec; 81(5):1552-9. PubMed ID: 20888708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Setup uncertainties of anatomical sub-regions in head-and-neck cancer patients after offline CBCT guidance.
van Kranen S; van Beek S; Rasch C; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Apr; 73(5):1566-73. PubMed ID: 19306753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole-breast cancer radiotherapy.
Hattel SH; Andersen PA; Wahlstedt IH; Damkjaer S; Saini A; Thomsen JB
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jun; 20(6):39-44. PubMed ID: 31187538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of a 3D laser∕camera surface imaging system for setup verification of the pelvic and thoracic regions in radiotherapy treatments.
Pallotta S; Simontacchi G; Marrazzo L; Ceroti M; Paiar F; Biti G; Bucciolini M
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011710. PubMed ID: 23298080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
