256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22365847)
21. Fabrication of computationally designed scaffolds by low temperature 3D printing.
Castilho M; Dias M; Gbureck U; Groll J; Fernandes P; Pires I; Gouveia B; Rodrigues J; Vorndran E
Biofabrication; 2013 Sep; 5(3):035012. PubMed ID: 23887064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A novel bone scaffold design approach based on shape function and all-hexahedral mesh refinement.
Cai S; Xi J; Chua CK
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():45-55. PubMed ID: 22692603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A survey of methods for the evaluation of tissue engineering scaffold permeability.
Pennella F; Cerino G; Massai D; Gallo D; Falvo D'Urso Labate G; Schiavi A; Deriu MA; Audenino A; Morbiducci U
Ann Biomed Eng; 2013 Oct; 41(10):2027-41. PubMed ID: 23612914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The influence of dispersant concentration on the pore morphology of hydroxyapatite ceramics for bone tissue engineering.
Cyster LA; Grant DM; Howdle SM; Rose FR; Irvine DJ; Freeman D; Scotchford CA; Shakesheff KM
Biomaterials; 2005 Mar; 26(7):697-702. PubMed ID: 15350773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Scaffold microarchitecture determines internal bone directional growth structure: a numerical study.
Sanz-Herrera JA; Doblaré M; García-Aznar JM
J Biomech; 2010 Sep; 43(13):2480-6. PubMed ID: 20542275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hydrophobicity as a design criterion for polymer scaffolds in bone tissue engineering.
Jansen EJ; Sladek RE; Bahar H; Yaffe A; Gijbels MJ; Kuijer R; Bulstra SK; Guldemond NA; Binderman I; Koole LH
Biomaterials; 2005 Jul; 26(21):4423-31. PubMed ID: 15701371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of the architecture of tissue engineering scaffolds on cell seeding and culturing.
Melchels FP; Barradas AM; van Blitterswijk CA; de Boer J; Feijen J; Grijpma DW
Acta Biomater; 2010 Nov; 6(11):4208-17. PubMed ID: 20561602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A novel route in bone tissue engineering: magnetic biomimetic scaffolds.
Bock N; Riminucci A; Dionigi C; Russo A; Tampieri A; Landi E; Goranov VA; Marcacci M; Dediu V
Acta Biomater; 2010 Mar; 6(3):786-96. PubMed ID: 19788946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Structural and vascular analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds, Part 2: Topology optimisation.
Almeida HA; Bártolo PJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():209-36. PubMed ID: 22692613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis.
Karageorgiou V; Kaplan D
Biomaterials; 2005 Sep; 26(27):5474-91. PubMed ID: 15860204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mechanical characterization of collagen-glycosaminoglycan scaffolds.
Harley BA; Leung JH; Silva EC; Gibson LJ
Acta Biomater; 2007 Jul; 3(4):463-74. PubMed ID: 17349829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Darcian permeability constant as indicator for shear stresses in regular scaffold systems for tissue engineering.
Vossenberg P; Higuera GA; van Straten G; van Blitterswijk CA; van Boxtel AJ
Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2009 Dec; 8(6):499-507. PubMed ID: 19360445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Biomimetic modification of porous TiNbZr alloy scaffold for bone tissue engineering.
Wang X; Li Y; Hodgson PD; Wen C
Tissue Eng Part A; 2010 Jan; 16(1):309-16. PubMed ID: 19705960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bone tissue formation under ideal conditions in a scaffold generated by a reaction-diffusion system.
Velasco AM; Garzón-Alvarado DA
Mol Cell Biomech; 2013 Jun; 10(2):137-57. PubMed ID: 24015480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of different fabrication techniques used for processing 3-dimensional, porous, biodegradable scaffolds from modified starch for bone tissue engineering.
Kunjachan V; Subramanian A; Hanna M; Guan JJ
Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():129-35. PubMed ID: 15133947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Structural and vascular analysis of tissue engineering scaffolds, Part 1: Numerical fluid analysis.
Almeida HA; Bártolo PJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 868():183-207. PubMed ID: 22692612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Simulation of angiogenesis and cell differentiation in a CaP scaffold subjected to compressive strains using a lattice modeling approach.
Sandino C; Checa S; Prendergast PJ; Lacroix D
Biomaterials; 2010 Mar; 31(8):2446-52. PubMed ID: 19969348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Tissue engineering of bone: search for a better scaffold.
Mastrogiacomo M; Muraglia A; Komlev V; Peyrin F; Rustichelli F; Crovace A; Cancedda R
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2005 Nov; 8(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 16238608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Synthesis, microstructure and mechanical properties of porous Mg--Zn scaffolds.
Seyedraoufi ZS; Mirdamadi Sh
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 May; 21():1-8. PubMed ID: 23454363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Optimising bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Jones JR; Ehrenfried LM; Hench LL
Biomaterials; 2006 Mar; 27(7):964-73. PubMed ID: 16102812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
