These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2236692)

  • 21. Carcinoma of the cervix: value of MR imaging in detecting parametrial involvement.
    Sironi S; Belloni C; Taccagni GL; DelMaschio A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Apr; 156(4):753-6. PubMed ID: 2003441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Clinical significance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluation of the extension of uterine cervical cancer].
    Matsubara M
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1993 Oct; 45(10):1115-22. PubMed ID: 8245590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cervical carcinoma: assessment of parametrial invasion and lymph node metastasis with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Sheu MH; Chang CY; Wang JH; Yen MS
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 2000 Aug; 63(8):634-40. PubMed ID: 10969450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Application of tumor markers CEA, TPA, and SCC-Ag in patients with low-risk FIGO stage IB and IIA squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Juang CM; Wang PH; Yen MS; Lai CR; Ng HT; Yuan CC
    Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Jan; 76(1):103-6. PubMed ID: 10620449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of tumor volume in cervical cancer by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Narayan K; McKenzie A; Fisher R; Susil B; Jobling T; Bernshaw D
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2003 Oct; 26(5):e163-8. PubMed ID: 14528092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Invasive carcinoma of the cervix uteri (Stage IB-IIB). Comparison of CT and MR for the assessment of the parametrium].
    Sironi S; Zanello A; Rodighiero MG; Vanzulli A; Taccagni GL; Belloni C; Del Maschio A
    Radiol Med; 1991 May; 81(5):671-7. PubMed ID: 2057595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Laparoscopic surgical staging in cervical cancer--preliminary experience among Chinese.
    Chu KK; Chang SD; Chen FP; Soong YK
    Gynecol Oncol; 1997 Jan; 64(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 8995546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The histologically evaluated accuracy of lymphography in operative therapy of invasive cervix cancer stages Ib-IIb].
    Bergander S; Sarembe B; Nitzsche H; Richter P; Nitzsche M
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1985; 107(12):721-5. PubMed ID: 4036395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [MRI findings of uterine cervical cancer and value of MRI in preoperative staging].
    Li XC; Shang JB; Wu XM; Zeng QS; Sun CP; He JX; Zhong ZW; Chen ZS
    Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2007 Mar; 27(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 17425990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Magnetic resonance imaging applications in uterine cervical cancer.
    Mezrich R
    Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1994 May; 2(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 7489286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stromal invasion of the cervix can be excluded from the criteria for using adjuvant radiotherapy following radical surgery for patients with cervical cancer.
    Shimada M; Kigawa J; Takahashi M; Minagawa Y; Okada M; Kanamori Y; Itamochi H; Oishi T; Iba T; Terakawa N
    Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):628-31. PubMed ID: 15196855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Changes in the demographics and perioperative care of stage IA(2)/IB(1) cervical cancer over the past 16 years.
    Covens A; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; DePetrillo AD; Lickrish G; Colgan T; Chapman W; Shaw P
    Gynecol Oncol; 2001 May; 81(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 11330939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
    Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Uterine cervix cancers: staging by magnetic resonance imaging].
    Bartoli JM; Moulin G; Di Stefano-Louineau D; Gaubert JY; Delannoy L; Delpero JR; Blanc B; Kasbarian M
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1990; 33(4-5):241-7. PubMed ID: 2268127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Postoperative radiation therapy for stage IB-IIB carcinoma of the cervix with poor prognostic factors.
    Uno T; Ito H; Itami J; Yasuda S; Isobe K; Hara R; Sato T; Minoura S; Shigematsu N; Kubo A
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(3B):2235-9. PubMed ID: 10928184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Role of magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to clinical staging in cervical carcinoma.
    Bhosale P; Peungjesada S; Devine C; Balachandran A; Iyer R
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2010; 34(6):855-64. PubMed ID: 21084900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comparison of the use of the transrectal surface coil and the pelvic phased-array coil in MR imaging for preoperative evaluation of uterine cervical carcinoma.
    Kim MJ; Chung JJ; Lee YH; Lee JT; Yoo HS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 May; 168(5):1215-21. PubMed ID: 9129414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651-Gynecologic Oncology Group 183.
    Hricak H; Gatsonis C; Chi DS; Amendola MA; Brandt K; Schwartz LH; Koelliker S; Siegelman ES; Brown JJ; McGhee RB; Iyer R; Vitellas KM; Snyder B; Long HJ; Fiorica JV; Mitchell DG; ;
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Dec; 23(36):9329-37. PubMed ID: 16361632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. MR staging accuracy for endometrial cancer based on the new FIGO stage.
    Shin KE; Park BK; Kim CK; Bae DS; Song SY; Kim B
    Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):818-24. PubMed ID: 21742787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Invasive cervical carcinoma: role of MR imaging in pretreatment work-up--cost minimization and diagnostic efficacy analysis.
    Hricak H; Powell CB; Yu KK; Washington E; Subak LL; Stern JL; Cisternas MG; Arenson RL
    Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):403-9. PubMed ID: 8596840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.