These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22367093)

  • 1. Variations in carrier pulse rate and the perception of amplitude modulation in cochlear implant users.
    Green T; Faulkner A; Rosen S
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):221-30. PubMed ID: 22367093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship Between Peripheral and Psychophysical Measures of Amplitude Modulation Detection in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Tejani VD; Abbas PJ; Brown CJ
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e268-e284. PubMed ID: 28207576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Modulation frequency discrimination with single and multiple channels in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Oba S; Başkent D; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2015 Jun; 324():7-18. PubMed ID: 25746914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A; Sly D; Cowan R; van Hoesel R
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Intensity coding in electric hearing: effects of electrode configurations and stimulation waveforms.
    Chua TE; Bachman M; Zeng FG
    Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):679-89. PubMed ID: 21610498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear-implant high pulse rate and narrow electrode configuration impair transmission of temporal information to the auditory cortex.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):92-107. PubMed ID: 18450583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparisons between detection threshold and loudness perception for individual cochlear implant channels.
    Bierer JA; Nye AD
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):641-51. PubMed ID: 25036146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.
    Middlebrooks JC
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jul; 100(1):76-91. PubMed ID: 18367697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Auditory detection and discrimination in deaf cats: psychophysical and neural thresholds for intracochlear electrical signals.
    Vollmer M; Beitel RE; Snyder RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2001 Nov; 86(5):2330-43. PubMed ID: 11698523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Sensitivity of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve to Amplitude Modulation Cues Declines With Advanced Age.
    Riggs WJ; Vaughan C; Skidmore J; Conroy S; Pellittieri A; Carter BL; Stegman CJ; He S
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(5):1358-1372. PubMed ID: 33795616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulse-rate discrimination deficit in cochlear implant users: is the upper limit of pitch peripheral or central?
    Zhou N; Mathews J; Dong L
    Hear Res; 2019 Jan; 371():1-10. PubMed ID: 30423498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of pulse shape on pitch sensitivity of cochlear implant users.
    Arslan NO; Luo X
    Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 450():109075. PubMed ID: 38986164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Auditory steady-state responses in cochlear implant users: Effect of modulation frequency and stimulation artifacts.
    Gransier R; Deprez H; Hofmann M; Moonen M; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():149-160. PubMed ID: 26994660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A method to dynamically control unwanted loudness cues when measuring amplitude modulation detection in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ; Oba S; Başkent D
    J Neurosci Methods; 2014 Jan; 222():207-12. PubMed ID: 24269251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rate pitch discrimination in cochlear implant users with the use of double pulses and different interpulse intervals.
    Pieper SH; Bahmer A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Nov; 20(6):312-323. PubMed ID: 31448701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Relationships between auditory nerve activity and temporal pitch perception in cochlear implant users.
    Carlyon RP; Deeks JM
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():363-71. PubMed ID: 23716242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal modulation transfer functions in cochlear implantees using a method that limits overall loudness cues.
    Fraser M; McKay CM
    Hear Res; 2012 Jan; 283(1-2):59-69. PubMed ID: 22146425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Stimulation Rate and Voice Pitch Perception in Cochlear Implants.
    Kovačić D; James CJ
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Oct; 23(5):665-680. PubMed ID: 35918501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Unilateral cochlear implant use promotes normal-like loudness perception in adolescents with childhood deafness.
    Steel MM; Abbasalipour P; Salloum CA; Hasek D; Papsin BC; Gordon KA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):e291-301. PubMed ID: 25072236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sensitivity of bilateral cochlear implant users to fine-structure and envelope interaural time differences.
    Noel VA; Eddington DK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2314-28. PubMed ID: 23556598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.