These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22367365)

  • 21. Salvage logging following fires can minimize boreal caribou habitat loss while maintaining forest quotas: An example of compensatory cumulative effects.
    Beguin J; McIntire EJ; Raulier F
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Nov; 163():234-45. PubMed ID: 26321533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management.
    Khan I; Zhao M
    Sci Total Environ; 2019 Jan; 646():821-831. PubMed ID: 30064108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Non-use Economic Values for Little-Known Aquatic Species at Risk: Comparing Choice Experiment Results from Surveys Focused on Species, Guilds, and Ecosystems.
    Rudd MA; Andres S; Kilfoil M
    Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):476-90. PubMed ID: 27294723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Identifying Societal Preferences for River Restoration in a Densely Populated Urban Environment: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment in Central Brussels.
    Chen WY; Liekens I; Broekx S
    Environ Manage; 2017 Aug; 60(2):263-279. PubMed ID: 28477238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Public Attitudes, Preferences and Willingness to Pay for River Ecosystem Services.
    Khan I; Lei H; Ali G; Ali S; Zhao M
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Oct; 16(19):. PubMed ID: 31581565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Wildlife-friendly food requires a multi-stakeholder approach to deliver landscape-scale biodiversity conservation in the Satoyama landscape of Japan.
    Sehra KK; MacMillan DC
    J Environ Manage; 2021 Nov; 297():113275. PubMed ID: 34329912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Implications of a valuation study for ecological and social indicators associated with Everglades restoration.
    Seeteram NA; Engel V; Mozumder P
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jun; 627():792-801. PubMed ID: 29426204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multiple approaches to valuation of conservation design and low-impact development features in residential subdivisions.
    Bowman T; Tyndall JC; Thompson J; Kliebenstein J; Colletti JP
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Aug; 104():101-13. PubMed ID: 22487398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Growing support for valuing ecosystems will help conserve the planet.
    Nature; 2021 Mar; 591(7849):178. PubMed ID: 33692565
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Valuing recreational benefits of coral reefs: the case of Mombasa Marine National Park and Reserve, Kenya.
    Ransom KP; Mangi SC
    Environ Manage; 2010 Jan; 45(1):145-54. PubMed ID: 19937021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Economic valuation of biodiversity conservation: the meaning of numbers.
    Martín-López B; Montes C; Benayas J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Jun; 22(3):624-35. PubMed ID: 18410400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Assessing the benefits and costs of dryland forest restoration in central Chile.
    Schiappacasse I; Nahuelhual L; Vásquez F; Echeverría C
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Apr; 97():38-45. PubMed ID: 22325581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effectiveness of marine reserve systems constructed using different surrogates of biodiversity.
    Sutcliffe PR; Klein CJ; Pitcher CR; Possingham HP
    Conserv Biol; 2015 Jun; 29(3):657-67. PubMed ID: 25922982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Benefits of the ballot box for species conservation.
    Kroetz K; Sanchirico JN; Armsworth PR; Banzhaf HS
    Ecol Lett; 2014 Mar; 17(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 24308886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Evaluation of ecosystem service values of the forests of Shennongjia Nature Reserve].
    Liu YJ; Wang SC; Peng H; Li ZQ
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2014 May; 25(5):1431-8. PubMed ID: 25129946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Increasing participation in incentive programs for biodiversity conservation.
    Sorice MG; Oh CO; Gartner T; Snieckus M; Johnson R; Donlan CJ
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1146-55. PubMed ID: 23967582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Assessing public preferences for forest biomass based energy in the southern United States.
    Susaeta A; Alavalapati J; Lal P; Matta JR; Mercer E
    Environ Manage; 2010 Apr; 45(4):697-710. PubMed ID: 20140672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Water ecosystem services in northern Australia--how much are they worth and who should pay for their provision?
    Zander KK; Parkes R; Straton A; Garnett ST
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e64411. PubMed ID: 23717611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Exploring the spatial heterogeneity of individual preferences for integrated river basin management: an example of Heihe river basin.
    Khan I; Khan SU; Zhao M; Khan AA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2019 Mar; 26(7):6911-6921. PubMed ID: 30644048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Integrating environmental gap analysis with spatial conservation prioritization: a case study from Victoria, Australia.
    Sharafi SM; Moilanen A; White M; Burgman M
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Dec; 112():240-51. PubMed ID: 22935646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.