These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22367365)

  • 41. Conserving tropical biodiversity via market forces and spatial targeting.
    Bateman IJ; Coombes E; Fitzherbert E; Binner A; Bad'ura T; Carbone C; Fisher B; Naidoo R; Watkinson AR
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Jun; 112(24):7408-13. PubMed ID: 26077906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Do residential localities matter? Revisiting preference heterogeneity and ranking of ecological attributes of an inland river basin.
    Khan I; Lei H; Muhammad I; Zhao M
    Sci Total Environ; 2021 Apr; 763():142970. PubMed ID: 33121777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The importance of a Biosphere Reserve of Atlantic Forest for the conservation of stream fauna.
    Yoshida CE; Uieda VS
    Braz J Biol; 2014 May; 74(2):382-94. PubMed ID: 25166323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Using multi-criteria analysis to explore non-market monetary values of water quality changes in the context of the Water Framework Directive.
    Martin-Ortega J; Berbel J
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(19):3990-7. PubMed ID: 20435337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Comparing the value of ecological protection in Sanjiang Plain wetland, Northeast China based on the stated preference method.].
    Fan ZJ; Ao CL; Mao BQ; Chen HG; Wang XD
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Feb; 28(2):500-508. PubMed ID: 29749158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Long-term protection effects of National Reserve to forest vegetation in 4 decades: biodiversity change analysis of major forest types in Changbai Mountain Nature Reserve, China.
    Bai F; Sang W; Li G; Liu R; Chen L; Wang K
    Sci China C Life Sci; 2008 Oct; 51(10):948-58. PubMed ID: 18815759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Household location choices: implications for biodiversity conservation.
    Peterson MN; Chen X; Liu J
    Conserv Biol; 2008 Aug; 22(4):912-21. PubMed ID: 18445074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. The Economic Value of the Greater Montreal Blue Network (Quebec, Canada): A Contingent Choice Study Using Real Projects to Estimate Non-Market Aquatic Ecosystem Services Benefits.
    Poder TG; Dupras J; Fetue Ndefo F; He J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0158901. PubMed ID: 27513558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Using local knowledge to model asymmetric preference formation in willingness to pay for environmental services.
    Glenk K
    J Environ Manage; 2011 Mar; 92(3):531-41. PubMed ID: 20934801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The business of biodiversity.
    Bayon R; Jenkins M
    Nature; 2010 Jul; 466(7303):184-5. PubMed ID: 20613823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Estimating the Cultural Value of Wild Animals in the Qinling Mountains, China: A Choice Experiment.
    Hou Y; Liu T; Zhao Z; Wen Y
    Animals (Basel); 2020 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 33348784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Accounting for tourism benefits in marine reserve design.
    Viana DF; Halpern BS; Gaines SD
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0190187. PubMed ID: 29267364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Toward a conceptual framework for blending social and biophysical attributes in conservation planning: a case-study of privately-conserved lands.
    Pasquini L; Twyman C; Wainwright J
    Environ Manage; 2010 Nov; 46(5):659-70. PubMed ID: 20842499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spectrum of concepts associated with the term "biodiversity": a case study in a biodiversity hotspot in South America.
    Cerda C; Bidegain I
    Environ Monit Assess; 2018 Mar; 190(4):207. PubMed ID: 29525918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Filling gaps in a large reserve network to address freshwater conservation needs.
    Hermoso V; Filipe AF; Segurado P; Beja P
    J Environ Manage; 2015 Sep; 161():358-365. PubMed ID: 26203875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Valuation of environmental improvements in a specially protected marine area: a choice experiment approach in Göcek Bay, Turkey.
    Can Ö; Alp E
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Nov; 439():291-8. PubMed ID: 23085470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Economic valuation of ecosystem services: application of a choice experiment approach on mount Guna services, North West of Ethiopia.
    Wondifraw Y; Taw TB; Meried EW
    Heliyon; 2021 Jun; 7(6):e07164. PubMed ID: 34159267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Private forest owners motivations for adopting biodiversity-related protection programs.
    Polomé P
    J Environ Manage; 2016 Dec; 183():212-219. PubMed ID: 27591847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Paying for Forest Ecosystem Services: Voluntary Versus Mandatory Payments.
    Roesch-McNally GE; Rabotyagov SS
    Environ Manage; 2016 Mar; 57(3):585-600. PubMed ID: 26661136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Ecological and socio-cultural factors influencing in situ conservation of crop diversity by traditional Andean households in Peru.
    Velásquez-Milla D; Casas A; Torres-Guevara J; Cruz-Soriano A
    J Ethnobiol Ethnomed; 2011 Dec; 7():40. PubMed ID: 22146009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.