285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22367455)
1. A robotic device as a sensitive quantitative tool to assess upper limb impairments in stroke patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study.
Gilliaux M; Lejeune T; Detrembleur C; Sapin J; Dehez B; Stoquart G
J Rehabil Med; 2012 Mar; 44(3):210-7. PubMed ID: 22367455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Using the robotic device REAplan as a valid, reliable, and sensitive tool to quantify upper limb impairments in stroke patients.
Gilliaux M; Lejeune TM; Detrembleur C; Sapin J; Dehez B; Selves C; Stoquart G
J Rehabil Med; 2014 Feb; 46(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 24213596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An assessment of robot-assisted bimanual movements on upper limb motor coordination following stroke.
Lewis GN; Perreault EJ
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Dec; 17(6):595-604. PubMed ID: 19666342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Role of Robotic Path Assistance and Weight Support in Facilitating 3D Movements in Individuals With Poststroke Hemiparesis.
Raghavan P; Bilaloglu S; Ali SZ; Jin X; Aluru V; Buckley MC; Tang A; Yousefi A; Stone J; Agrawal SK; Lu Y
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2020 Feb; 34(2):134-147. PubMed ID: 31959040
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.
Masiero S; Celia A; Rosati G; Armani M
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 88(2):142-9. PubMed ID: 17270510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A novel robotic system for quantifying arm kinematics and kinetics: description and evaluation in therapist-assisted passive arm movements post-stroke.
Culmer PR; Jackson AE; Makower SG; Cozens JA; Levesley MC; Mon-Williams M; Bhakta B
J Neurosci Methods; 2011 Apr; 197(2):259-69. PubMed ID: 21414360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Kinematic analysis of upper limbs and trunk movement during bilateral movement after stroke.
Messier S; Bourbonnais D; Desrosiers J; Roy Y
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Nov; 87(11):1463-70. PubMed ID: 17084121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients.
Colombo R; Pisano F; Micera S; Mazzone A; Delconte C; Carrozza MC; Dario P; Minuco G
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Sep; 13(3):311-24. PubMed ID: 16200755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robot-Assisted Reach Training for Improving Upper Extremity Function of Chronic Stroke.
Cho KH; Song WK
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2015 Oct; 237(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 26460793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Home-based Computer Assisted Arm Rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: results of a feasibility study in home setting.
Sivan M; Gallagher J; Makower S; Keeling D; Bhakta B; O'Connor RJ; Levesley M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Dec; 11():163. PubMed ID: 25495889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acceptability of robotic technology in neuro-rehabilitation: preliminary results on chronic stroke patients.
Mazzoleni S; Turchetti G; Palla I; Posteraro F; Dario P
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Sep; 116(2):116-22. PubMed ID: 24461799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic technologies and rehabilitation: new tools for upper-limb therapy and assessment in chronic stroke.
Zollo L; Gallotta E; Guglielmelli E; Sterzi S
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2011 Jun; 47(2):223-36. PubMed ID: 21445028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.
Germanotta M; Cruciani A; Pecchioli C; Loreti S; Spedicato A; Meotti M; Mosca R; Speranza G; Cecchi F; Giannarelli G; Padua L; Aprile I
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2018 May; 15(1):39. PubMed ID: 29769127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Instrumental indices for upper limb function assessment in stroke patients: a validation study.
Longhi M; Merlo A; Prati P; Giacobbi M; Mazzoli D
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2016 Jun; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 27278277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic unilateral and bilateral upper-limb movement training for stroke survivors afflicted by chronic hemiparesis.
Simkins M; Kim H; Abrams G; Byl N; Rosen J
IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot; 2013 Jun; 2013():6650506. PubMed ID: 24187321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Electroencephalographic markers of robot-aided therapy in stroke patients for the evaluation of upper limb rehabilitation.
Sale P; Infarinato F; Del Percio C; Lizio R; Babiloni C; Foti C; Franceschini M
Int J Rehabil Res; 2015 Dec; 38(4):294-305. PubMed ID: 26317486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Using kinematic analysis to evaluate constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients.
Caimmi M; Carda S; Giovanzana C; Maini ES; Sabatini AM; Smania N; Molteni F
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2008; 22(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 17595381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Understanding adaptive motor control of the paretic upper limb early poststroke: the EXPLICIT-stroke program.
van Kordelaar J; van Wegen EE; Nijland RH; Daffertshofer A; Kwakkel G
Neurorehabil Neural Repair; 2013; 27(9):854-63. PubMed ID: 23884015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Age Effects on Upper Limb Kinematics Assessed by the REAplan Robot in Healthy Subjects Aged 3 to 93 Years.
Gilliaux M; Lejeune TM; Sapin J; Dehez B; Stoquart G; Detrembleur C
Ann Biomed Eng; 2016 Apr; 44(4):1224-33. PubMed ID: 26208617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Modifying upper-limb inter-joint coordination in healthy subjects by training with a robotic exoskeleton.
Proietti T; Guigon E; Roby-Brami A; Jarrassé N
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2017 Jun; 14(1):55. PubMed ID: 28606179
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
