These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2236846)

  • 21. Grids in mammography.
    Egan RL; McSweeney MB; Sprawls P
    Radiology; 1983 Feb; 146(2):359-62. PubMed ID: 6849083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative study of films and screens for mammography.
    Kirkpatrick AE; Law J
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Jan; 60(709):73-8. PubMed ID: 3814998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The reduction of x-ray exposure in dental practice using rare-earth screen--fast film combinations.
    Greig DG
    Br Dent J; 1983 Jul; 155(1):17-8. PubMed ID: 6577879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Image quality and radiation exposure in digital mammography with storage phosphor screens in a magnification technic].
    Fiedler E; Aichinger U; Böhner C; Säbel M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz W
    Rofo; 1999 Jul; 171(1):60-4. PubMed ID: 10464507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Computed radiography.
    Kantor C
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 1997; 31(1):73-5. PubMed ID: 9051233
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reciprocity law failure for a film-screen combination: very long exposure times.
    Hale J; Thomas JW
    Health Phys; 1983 Sep; 45(3):780-2. PubMed ID: 6885487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Image contrast in various cassette-screen-film combinations].
    Barth HH; Grasser H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1985 Dec; 40(12):1230-4. PubMed ID: 3869536
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Proximal surface caries detection with direct-exposure and rare earth screen/film imaging.
    Lundeen RC; McDavid WD; Barnwell GM
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Dec; 66(6):734-45. PubMed ID: 3205558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two screen-film combinations in contact and magnification mammography: detectability of microcalcifications.
    Oestmann JW; Kopans DB; Linetsky L; Hall DA; McCarthy KA; White G; Swann C; Kelley JE; Johnson LL
    Radiology; 1988 Sep; 168(3):657-9. PubMed ID: 3406394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of kilovoltage on the relative speed of rare-earth screens.
    Thunthy KH; Weinberg R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1986; 15(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 3460902
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Technologic improvements in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):628-37. PubMed ID: 2406777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Ektaspeed and a screen/film system compared with Ultra-Speed in the interpretation of early proximal caries.
    Kogon SL; Stephens RG; Reid JA; Donner A
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1984 May; 50(5):397-401. PubMed ID: 6375836
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Green-sensitive X-ray systems and specific features of working with them].
    Blinov NN; Gorelik FG; Reznik KA
    Med Tekh; 2002; (5):13-5. PubMed ID: 12512275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Characteristics of screen-film systems for mammography in relation to a diverse modality of treatment].
    Rosselli Del Turco M; Milano F; Giani M; Bravetti P
    Radiol Med; 1988 Apr; 75(4):390-4. PubMed ID: 3375482
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A comparison of the accuracy of cephalometric landmark location between two screen/film combinations.
    Stirrups DR
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):211-5. PubMed ID: 2774297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Image quality and breast dose of 24 screen-film combinations for mammography.
    Dimakopoulou AD; Tsalafoutas IA; Georgiou EK; Yakoumakis EN
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Feb; 79(938):123-9. PubMed ID: 16489193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of detector dynamic range in the x-ray exposure domain in mammography: a comparison between film-screen and flat panel detector systems.
    Cooper VN; Oshiro T; Cagnon CH; Bassett LW; McLeod-Stockmann TM; Bezrukiy NV
    Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2614-21. PubMed ID: 14596297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with a conventional screen film system (SFS) and a new full-field digital mammography unit (DR) with a-Se-detector.
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Wenkel E; Schmid A; Imhoff K; Bautz W
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):766-8. PubMed ID: 12811687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct comparison of conventional and computed radiography with a dual-image recording technique.
    MacMahon H; Sanada S; Doi K; Giger M; Xu XW; Yin FF; Montner SM; Carlin M
    Radiographics; 1991 Mar; 11(2):259-68. PubMed ID: 2028063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.