These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2236855)

  • 21. [Radiation exposure and radiation risk of the patient in mammography].
    Hasert V
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1988; 29(4):605-9. PubMed ID: 3174959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hypothetical breast cancer risk from mammography.
    Feig SA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1984; 90():1-10. PubMed ID: 6366947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Study of radiation induced cancers in a breast screening programme.
    León A; Verdú G; Cuevas MD; Salas MD; Villaescusa JI; Bueno F
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2001; 93(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 11548322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The risk of radiation-induced breast cancers due to biennial mammographic screening in women aged 50-69 years is minimal.
    Hauge IH; Pedersen K; Olerud HM; Hole EO; Hofvind S
    Acta Radiol; 2014 Dec; 55(10):1174-9. PubMed ID: 24311702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of screening programs for the early diagnosis of breast cancer.
    Strax P
    Surg Clin North Am; 1978 Aug; 58(4):667-79. PubMed ID: 684559
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Radiation risk in mammography as presented by the media].
    Jung H
    Rofo; 1998 Oct; 169(4):335. PubMed ID: 9819643
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Two-view screening and extending the age range: the balance of benefit and risk.
    Law J; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 2002 Nov; 75(899):889-94. PubMed ID: 12466254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The supposed cancer risk from mammography. Opposition to the assertions (author's transl)].
    Oeser H; Koeppe P; Rach K
    Rofo; 1976 Dec; 125(6):487-90. PubMed ID: 137843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Risk benefit in mass screening programs for breast cancer.
    Miller AB
    Semin Oncol; 1978 Dec; 5(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 104389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Breast cancer induced by radiation. Relation to mammography and treatment of acne.
    Simon N
    JAMA; 1977 Feb; 237(8):789-90. PubMed ID: 137991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Enhanced biological effectiveness of low energy X-rays and implications for the UK breast screening programme.
    Redpath JL; Mitchel RE
    Br J Radiol; 2006 Oct; 79(946):854-5; author reply 855-7. PubMed ID: 16980679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Screening for breast cancer in younger women: life expectancy gains and losses. An analysis according to risk indicator groups.
    Seidman H
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1977; 27(2):66-87. PubMed ID: 402989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Risk of radiation-induced breast cancer from mammographic screening.
    Yaffe MJ; Mainprize JG
    Radiology; 2011 Jan; 258(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 21081671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ataxia telangiectasia and risk of breast cancer.
    Werneke U
    Lancet; 1997 Sep; 350(9079):739-40. PubMed ID: 9291927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance?
    Beemsterboer PM; Warmerdam PG; Boer R; de Koning HJ
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9718526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mammography 1982: a statement of the American Cancer Society.
    CA Cancer J Clin; 1982; 32(4):226-31. PubMed ID: 6805868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Comment on "Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses".
    Mitchel RE; Redpath JL
    J Radiol Prot; 2009 Sep; 29(3):457-9. PubMed ID: 19810287
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Routine screening mammography: how important is the radiation-risk side of the benefit-risk equation?
    Brenner DJ; Sawant SG; Hande MP; Miller RC; Elliston CD; Fu Z; Randers-Pehrson G; Marino SA
    Int J Radiat Biol; 2002 Dec; 78(12):1065-7. PubMed ID: 12556334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Mammography and radiation risk].
    Jung H
    Rofo; 1998 Oct; 169(4):336-43. PubMed ID: 9819644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast Cancer Induced by X-Ray Mammography Screening? A Review Based on Recent Understanding of Low-Dose Radiobiology.
    Pauwels EK; Foray N; Bourguignon MH
    Med Princ Pract; 2016; 25(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 26571215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.