These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2236865)

  • 1. Quality requirements in mammographic screening in Sweden.
    Leitz W
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1990; 119():75-80. PubMed ID: 2236865
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Quality assured images in mammographic screening. Assessment criteria as a basis for national guidelines].
    Ståhl M; Edström C
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Mar; 98(10):1097-101. PubMed ID: 11301976
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of results from quality control of physical parameters and results from clinical evaluation of mammographic images for the mammography screening facilities in Poland.
    Fabiszewska E; Grabska I; Jankowska K; Wesolowska E; Bulski W
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):206-9. PubMed ID: 21824870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mammographic screening fulfills the requirements of health control].
    Sandelin K
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Mar; 96(9):983-4. PubMed ID: 10093435
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The quality of mammography scrutinized. Ongoing control mass screenings for breast cancer is necessary].
    Andersson I; Rydén S; Karlberg I
    Lakartidningen; 1995 Aug; 92(35):3106-9. PubMed ID: 7658762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Double scrutiny of mammographic screening is effective!].
    Thurfjell E
    Lakartidningen; 1994 Nov; 91(46):4243. PubMed ID: 7808119
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Organised mammographic screening--more benefits than harms.
    Hofvind S
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2013 Mar; 133(6):619-20. PubMed ID: 23552154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [SBU does not make statements on mammographic screening without basic data].
    Werkö L
    Lakartidningen; 1996 Jan; 93(3):117. PubMed ID: 8569313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A phantom for the measurement of contrast detail performance in film-screen mammography.
    Thompson SR; Faulkner K
    Br J Radiol; 1991 Nov; 64(767):1049-55. PubMed ID: 1742587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of alternative practices on the cost and quality of mammographic screening in the United States.
    Burnside E; Belkora J; Esserman L
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2001 Jul; 2(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 11899786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of mammographic parenchymal patterns in screening for carcinoma of the breast.
    Kalisher L; McLelland R
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1991 Jan; 172(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 1985351
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Create an individual-based national registry of mammographic screening].
    Nyström L
    Lakartidningen; 2000 Mar; 97(12):1450-1. PubMed ID: 10765628
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic screening.
    Marsden J
    J Br Menopause Soc; 2004 Jun; 10(2):75, 80. PubMed ID: 15207029
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Factors influencing quality of mammograms].
    Loewe C; Fuchsjäger M; Helbich TH
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 2003; 115 Suppl 2():40-5. PubMed ID: 15518145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality assurance for screening mammography: an international comparison.
    Klabunde C; Bouchard F; Taplin S; Scharpantgen A; Ballard-Barbash R;
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2001 Mar; 55(3):204-12. PubMed ID: 11160176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography.
    Hendrick RE
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial.
    Tabàr L; Gad A
    Radiology; 1981 Jan; 138(1):219-22. PubMed ID: 7005939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Standardized mammography reporting.
    Kopans DB
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1992 Jan; 30(1):257-64. PubMed ID: 1732932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Bavarian mammography screening: results of consistency tests in X-ray units over three months].
    Blendl C; Klug A; Lohmann R; Moll C; Schädlich J; Blaser D
    Rofo; 2004 Aug; 176(8):1157-66. PubMed ID: 15346292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An inquiry on mammography in Sweden: uneven regional distribution--8 counties have no resources for screening].
    Lennholm B
    Lakartidningen; 1989 Oct; 86(40):3379-80, 3384. PubMed ID: 2796528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.