175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22369349)
1. Improving ChIP-seq peak-calling for functional co-regulator binding by integrating multiple sources of biological information.
Osmanbeyoglu HU; Hartmaier RJ; Oesterreich S; Lu X
BMC Genomics; 2012; 13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 22369349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ChIP-BIT: Bayesian inference of target genes using a novel joint probabilistic model of ChIP-seq profiles.
Chen X; Jung JG; Shajahan-Haq AN; Clarke R; Shih IeM; Wang Y; Magnani L; Wang TL; Xuan J
Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Apr; 44(7):e65. PubMed ID: 26704972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cell-type specificity of ChIP-predicted transcription factor binding sites.
Håndstad T; Rye M; Močnik R; Drabløs F; Sætrom P
BMC Genomics; 2012 Aug; 13():372. PubMed ID: 22863112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. HiChIP: a high-throughput pipeline for integrative analysis of ChIP-Seq data.
Yan H; Evans J; Kalmbach M; Moore R; Middha S; Luban S; Wang L; Bhagwate A; Li Y; Sun Z; Chen X; Kocher JP
BMC Bioinformatics; 2014 Aug; 15(1):280. PubMed ID: 25128017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ritornello: high fidelity control-free chromatin immunoprecipitation peak calling.
Stanton KP; Jin J; Lederman RR; Weissman SM; Kluger Y
Nucleic Acids Res; 2017 Dec; 45(21):e173. PubMed ID: 28981893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Triform algorithm: improved sensitivity and specificity in ChIP-Seq peak finding.
Kornacker K; Rye MB; Håndstad T; Drabløs F
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Jul; 13():176. PubMed ID: 22827163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. AIControl: replacing matched control experiments with machine learning improves ChIP-seq peak identification.
Hiranuma N; Lundberg SM; Lee SI
Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Jun; 47(10):e58. PubMed ID: 30869146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A MAD-Bayes Algorithm for State-Space Inference and Clustering with Application to Querying Large Collections of ChIP-Seq Data Sets.
Zuo C; Chen K; Keleş S
J Comput Biol; 2017 Jun; 24(6):472-485. PubMed ID: 27835030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A practical comparison of methods for detecting transcription factor binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments.
Laajala TD; Raghav S; Tuomela S; Lahesmaa R; Aittokallio T; Elo LL
BMC Genomics; 2009 Dec; 10():618. PubMed ID: 20017957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An improved ChIP-seq peak detection system for simultaneously identifying post-translational modified transcription factors by combinatorial fusion, using SUMOylation as an example.
Cheng CY; Chu CH; Hsu HW; Hsu FR; Tang CY; Wang WC; Kung HJ; Chang PC
BMC Genomics; 2014; 15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1. PubMed ID: 24564277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ChIP-Seq using high-throughput DNA sequencing for genome-wide identification of transcription factor binding sites.
Lefrançois P; Zheng W; Snyder M
Methods Enzymol; 2010; 470():77-104. PubMed ID: 20946807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is this the right normalization? A diagnostic tool for ChIP-seq normalization.
Angelini C; Heller R; Volkinshtein R; Yekutieli D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():150. PubMed ID: 25957089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid innovation in ChIP-seq peak-calling algorithms is outdistancing benchmarking efforts.
Szalkowski AM; Schmid CD
Brief Bioinform; 2011 Nov; 12(6):626-33. PubMed ID: 21059603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Optimizing detection of transcription factor-binding sites in ChIP-seq experiments.
Kallio A; Elo LL
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1038():181-91. PubMed ID: 23872976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Genome-wide identification of in vivo protein-DNA binding sites from ChIP-Seq data.
Jothi R; Cuddapah S; Barski A; Cui K; Zhao K
Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Sep; 36(16):5221-31. PubMed ID: 18684996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Role of ChIP-seq in the discovery of transcription factor binding sites, differential gene regulation mechanism, epigenetic marks and beyond.
Mundade R; Ozer HG; Wei H; Prabhu L; Lu T
Cell Cycle; 2014; 13(18):2847-52. PubMed ID: 25486472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Unified Analysis of Multiple ChIP-Seq Datasets.
Ma G; Babarinde IA; Zhuang Q; Hutchins AP
Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2198():451-465. PubMed ID: 32822050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Integrative analysis of ChIP-chip and ChIP-seq dataset.
Zhu LJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2013; 1067():105-24. PubMed ID: 23975789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PePr: a peak-calling prioritization pipeline to identify consistent or differential peaks from replicated ChIP-Seq data.
Zhang Y; Lin YH; Johnson TD; Rozek LS; Sartor MA
Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(18):2568-75. PubMed ID: 24894502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Active promoters give rise to false positive 'Phantom Peaks' in ChIP-seq experiments.
Jain D; Baldi S; Zabel A; Straub T; Becker PB
Nucleic Acids Res; 2015 Aug; 43(14):6959-68. PubMed ID: 26117547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
