These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22369399)

  • 21. Effects of prolonged second stage, method of birth, timing of caesarean section and other obstetric risk factors on postnatal urinary incontinence: an Australian nulliparous cohort study.
    Brown SJ; Gartland D; Donath S; MacArthur C
    BJOG; 2011 Jul; 118(8):991-1000. PubMed ID: 21489125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Labour dystocia--risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour--a population-based cohort study.
    Sandström A; Cnattingius S; Wikström AK; Stephansson O
    BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1648-56. PubMed ID: 23078516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Induction or caesarean section for preterm pre-eclampsia?
    Mashiloane CD; Moodley J
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2002 Jul; 22(4):353-6. PubMed ID: 12521452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas.
    Vahratian A; Zhang J; Troendle JF; Sciscione AC; Hoffman MK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):698-704. PubMed ID: 15802393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Pregnancies past the estimated date of confinement: labour and delivery outcome.
    Al-Taani M
    East Mediterr Health J; 2003; 9(5-6):955-60. PubMed ID: 16450525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Induction at 41 weeks increases the risk of caesarean section in a hospital with a low rate of caesarean sections.
    Burgos J; Rodríguez L; Otero B; Cobos P; Osuna C; Centeno Mdel M; Melchor JC; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 Sep; 25(9):1716-8. PubMed ID: 22339273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Uterine rupture after previous caesarean section.
    Al-Zirqi I; Stray-Pedersen B; Forsén L; Vangen S
    BJOG; 2010 Jun; 117(7):809-20. PubMed ID: 20236103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Induction of labor with prostaglandins for medical reasons: determining explanatory variables of the induction to delivery time interval for vaginal deliveries and caesarean section.
    Braems G; Norhausen I
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Dec; 135(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 17240033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery.
    Kuppens SM; Hutton EK; Hasaart TH; Aichi N; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Oct; 35(10):883-888. PubMed ID: 24165055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Retrospective analysis of 663 breech deliveries during the years 1976 to 1985].
    Lellé RJ; Goeschen K; Wichmann D; Schneider J
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1989; 193(6):268-75. PubMed ID: 2609709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Induction of labor and cesarean delivery by gestational age.
    Caughey AB; Nicholson JM; Cheng YW; Lyell DJ; Washington AE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 195(3):700-5. PubMed ID: 16949399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vaginal birth after one previous Caesarean section--evaluation of predictive factors.
    Ola ER; Imosemi OD; Abudu OO
    Afr J Med Med Sci; 2001; 30(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 14510153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Earlier induction of labour in post term pregnancies--A historical cohort study.
    Kjeldsen LL; Sindberg M; Maimburg RD
    Midwifery; 2015 May; 31(5):526-31. PubMed ID: 25726005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neonatal outcomes with caesarean delivery at term.
    Liston FA; Allen VM; O'Connell CM; Jangaard KA
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2008 May; 93(3):F176-82. PubMed ID: 17942582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Elective induction vs. spontaneous labor associations and outcomes.
    Glantz JC
    J Reprod Med; 2005 Apr; 50(4):235-40. PubMed ID: 15916205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maternal and neonatal outcomes after induction of labor without an identified indication.
    Dublin S; Lydon-Rochelle M; Kaplan RC; Watts DH; Critchlow CW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Oct; 183(4):986-94. PubMed ID: 11035351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effect of labor induction on cesarean section rates in diabetic pregnancies.
    Levy AL; Gonzalez JL; Rappaport VJ; Curet LB; Rayburn WF
    J Reprod Med; 2002 Nov; 47(11):931-2. PubMed ID: 12497683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Maternal anthropometric risk factors for caesarean delivery before or after onset of labour.
    Sherrard A; Platt RW; Vallerand D; Usher RH; Zhang X; Kramer MS
    BJOG; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1088-96. PubMed ID: 17617199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A randomised controlled trial of early versus delayed oxytocin augmentation to treat primary dysfunctional labour in nulliparous women.
    Hinshaw K; Simpson S; Cummings S; Hildreth A; Thornton J
    BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1289-95; discussion 1295-6. PubMed ID: 18715415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Vaginal birth after one previous caesarean section in a tertiary institution in Nigeria.
    Aisien AO; Oronsaye AU
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2004 Nov; 24(8):886-90. PubMed ID: 16147643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.