166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22369409)
1. 'See and treat' outpatient hysteroscopy with novel fibreoptic 'Alphascope'.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Zizolfi B; Lodhi W; Bifulco G; Fernandez L; Spinelli M; Nappi C
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 32(3):298-300. PubMed ID: 22369409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of hysteroscopic mechanical tissue removal with bipolar electrical resection for the management of endometrial polyps in an ambulatory care setting: preliminary results.
Pampalona JR; Bastos MD; Moreno GM; Pust AB; Montesdeoca GE; Guerra Garcia A; Pruñonosa JC; Collado RC; Torras PB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015; 22(3):439-45. PubMed ID: 25497165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The feasibility, success and patient satisfaction associated with outpatient hysteroscopic sterilisation.
Sinha D; Kalathy V; Gupta JK; Clark TJ
BJOG; 2007 Jun; 114(6):676-83. PubMed ID: 17516957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. AlphaScope vs lens-based hysteroscope for office polypectomy without anesthesia: randomized controlled study.
Cicinelli E; Tinelli R; Loiudice L; Loiudice I; Quattromini P; Fusco A; Cicinelli MV; Pinto V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(6):796-9. PubMed ID: 22024266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile women: effects of gynecologist experience, instrument size, and distention medium on patient discomfort.
Pluchino N; Ninni F; Angioni S; Artini P; Araujo VG; Massimetti G; Genazzani AR; Cela V
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):344-50. PubMed ID: 20417426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Office hysteroscopy: comparison of 2.7- and 4-mm hysteroscopes for acceptability, feasibility and diagnostic accuracy.
Rullo S; Sorrenti G; Marziali M; Ermini B; Sesti F; Piccione E
J Reprod Med; 2005 Jan; 50(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 15730173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Acceptance of outpatient flexible hysteroscopy by premenopausal and postmenopausal women.
Agostini A; Bretelle F; Cravello L; Maisonneuve AS; Roger V; Blanc B
J Reprod Med; 2003 Jun; 48(6):441-3. PubMed ID: 12856515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomised trial comparing the H Pipelle with the standard Pipelle for endometrial sampling at 'no-touch' (vaginoscopic) hysteroscopy.
Madari S; Al-Shabibi N; Papalampros P; Papadimitriou A; Magos A
BJOG; 2009 Jan; 116(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 19087077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study of the use of the Myosure resectoscope to manage endometrial polyps in an outpatient setting.
McIlwaine P; McElhinney B; Karthigasu KA; Hart R
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Oct; 55(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 26259638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Small-diameter hysteroscopy with Versapoint versus resectoscopy with a unipolar knife for the treatment of septate uterus: a prospective randomized study.
Colacurci N; De Franciscis P; Mollo A; Litta P; Perino A; Cobellis L; De Placido G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(5):622-7. PubMed ID: 17848325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy.
Campo R; Molinas CR; Rombauts L; Mestdagh G; Lauwers M; Braekmans P; Brosens I; Van Belle Y; Gordts S
Hum Reprod; 2005 Jan; 20(1):258-63. PubMed ID: 15550496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility and pain control in outpatient hysteroscopy in postmenopausal women: a randomized trial.
Giorda G; Scarabelli C; Franceschi S; Campagnutta E
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2000 Jul; 79(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 10929961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Flexible versus rigid endoscopes for outpatient hysteroscopy: a prospective randomized clinical trial.
Unfried G; Wieser F; Albrecht A; Kaider A; Nagele F
Hum Reprod; 2001 Jan; 16(1):168-171. PubMed ID: 11139557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Outpatient hysteroscopic polypectomy in postmenopausal women: a comparison between mechanical and electrosurgical resection.
Garuti G; Centinaio G; Luerti M
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):595-600. PubMed ID: 18722972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hysteroscopy: a technique for all? Analysis of 5,000 outpatient hysteroscopies.
Di Spiezio Sardo A; Taylor A; Tsirkas P; Mastrogamvrakis G; Sharma M; Magos A
Fertil Steril; 2008 Feb; 89(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 17482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [The 3mm optical system in hysteroscopy].
Tóth D; Kuzel D; Zivný J
Ceska Gynekol; 2002 Sep; 67(5):293-6. PubMed ID: 12434667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A randomised controlled trial comparing outpatient versus daycase endometrial polypectomy.
Marsh FA; Rogerson LJ; Duffy SR
BJOG; 2006 Aug; 113(8):896-901. PubMed ID: 16753049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial comparing monopolar electrodes using glycine 1.5% with two different types of bipolar electrodes (TCRis, Versapoint) using saline, in hysteroscopic surgery.
Berg A; Sandvik L; Langebrekke A; Istre O
Fertil Steril; 2009 Apr; 91(4):1273-8. PubMed ID: 18371962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Outpatient hysteroscopy: factors influencing post-procedure acceptability in patients attending a tertiary referral centre.
McIlwaine K; Readman E; Cameron M; Maher P
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Dec; 49(6):650-2. PubMed ID: 20070716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Hysteroscopic bipolar surgery: a valuable progress or a technique under investigation?
Garuti G; Luerti M
Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Aug; 21(4):329-34. PubMed ID: 19512926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
