BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22370613)

  • 1. Assessment of aortic valve area combining echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Nickl W; Füth R; Smettan J; Köhler T; Lankisch M; Kramer F; Krahn T; Barroso MC; Klein RM; Dinh W
    Arq Bras Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 98(3):234-42. PubMed ID: 22370613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Differences in aortic valve area measured with CT planimetry and echocardiography (continuity equation) are related to divergent estimates of left ventricular outflow tract area.
    Halpern EJ; Mallya R; Sewell M; Shulman M; Zwas DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1668-73. PubMed ID: 19457833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: comparison of an original semiautomated analysis of phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance with Doppler echocardiography.
    Defrance C; Bollache E; Kachenoura N; Perdrix L; Hrynchyshyn N; Bruguière E; Redheuil A; Diebold B; Mousseaux E
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):604-12. PubMed ID: 22798520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Three-dimensional imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract: impact on aortic valve area estimation by the continuity equation.
    Gaspar T; Adawi S; Sachner R; Asmer I; Ganaeem M; Rubinshtein R; Shiran A
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2012 Jul; 25(7):749-57. PubMed ID: 22613774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of the ellipsoid shape of the left ventricular outflow tract on the echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis.
    De Vecchi C; Caudron J; Dubourg B; Pirot N; Lefebvre V; Bauer F; Eltchaninoff H; Dacher JN
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):52-7. PubMed ID: 24582043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of left ventricular outflow tract geometry in non-stenotic and stenotic aortic valves by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Burgstahler C; Kunze M; Löffler C; Gawaz MP; Hombach V; Merkle N
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):825-9. PubMed ID: 17060105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of aortic valve stenosis using a hybrid approach of Doppler echocardiography and inert gas rebreathing.
    Hamm K; Trinkmann F; Heggemann F; Gruettner J; Schmid-Bindert G; Borggrefe M; Haghi D; Saur J
    In Vivo; 2012; 26(6):1027-33. PubMed ID: 23160688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anatomic estimation of aortic stenosis severity vs "fusion" of data from computed tomography and Doppler echocardiography.
    Jander N; Wienecke S; Dorfs S; Ruile P; Neumann FJ; Pache G; Minners J
    Echocardiography; 2018 Jun; 35(6):777-784. PubMed ID: 29522643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integration of 3D imaging data in the assessment of aortic stenosis: impact on classification of disease severity.
    O'Brien B; Schoenhagen P; Kapadia SR; Svensson LG; Rodriguez L; Griffin BP; Tuzcu EM; Desai MY
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):566-73. PubMed ID: 21737600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Aortic valve stenotic area calculation from phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance: the importance of short echo time.
    O'Brien KR; Gabriel RS; Greiser A; Cowan BR; Young AA; Kerr AJ
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2009 Nov; 11(1):49. PubMed ID: 19925667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of left ventricular outflow geometry and aortic valve area in patients with aortic stenosis by 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional echocardiography.
    Saitoh T; Shiota M; Izumo M; Gurudevan SV; Tolstrup K; Siegel RJ; Shiota T
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1626-31. PubMed ID: 22440128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aortic valve area assessed with 320-detector computed tomography: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.
    Larsen LH; Kofoed KF; Carstensen HG; Mejdahl MR; Andersen MJ; Kjaergaard J; Nielsen OW; Køber L; Møgelvang R; Hassager C
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 30(1):165-73. PubMed ID: 24126620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis using cardiac magnetic resonance tomography: comparison with echocardiography.
    Malyar NM; Schlosser T; Barkhausen J; Gutersohn A; Buck T; Bartel T; Erbel R
    Cardiology; 2008; 109(2):126-34. PubMed ID: 17713328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of aortic valve area: comparison of different methods of echocardiography with 3-D scan of the excised valve.
    Shirazi S; Golmohammadi F; Tavoosi A; Salehi M; Larti F; Sardari A; Geraiely B; Rahmanian M; Saberi K; Sattarzadeh Badkoubeh R
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2021 Feb; 37(2):529-538. PubMed ID: 33001325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Planimetry of the aortic valve orifice area: comparison of multislice spiral computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.
    Westermann Y; Geigenmüller A; Elgeti T; Wagner M; Dushe S; Borges AC; Dohmen PM; Hein PA; Lembcke A
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Mar; 77(3):426-35. PubMed ID: 19783394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Usefulness of 3-Tesla cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of aortic stenosis severity in routine clinical practice.
    Levy F; Iacuzio L; Civaia F; Rusek S; Dommerc C; Hugues N; Alexandrescu C; Dor V; Tribouilloy C; Dreyfus G
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2016 Nov; 109(11):618-625. PubMed ID: 27692661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison between cardiovascular magnetic resonance and transthoracic Doppler echocardiography for the estimation of effective orifice area in aortic stenosis.
    Garcia J; Kadem L; Larose E; Clavel MA; Pibarot P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2011 Apr; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 21527021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correlation of aortic valve area obtained by the velocity-encoded phase contrast continuity method to direct planimetry using cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Tanaka K; Makaryus AN; Wolff SD
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 17891618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Planimetric and continuity equation assessment of aortic valve area: Head to head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance and echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Dec; 26(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 17968960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modified continuity equation using left ventricular outflow tract three-dimensional imaging for aortic valve area estimation.
    Pinto Teixeira P; Ramos R; Rio P; Moura Branco L; Portugal G; Abreu A; Galrinho A; Marques H; Figueiredo L; Cruz Ferreira R
    Echocardiography; 2017 Jul; 34(7):978-985. PubMed ID: 28589708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.