BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22371008)

  • 1. Flexible protein-ligand docking using the Fleksy protocol.
    Wagener M; Vlieg Jd; Nabuurs SB
    J Comput Chem; 2012 May; 33(12):1215-7. PubMed ID: 22371008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A flexible approach to induced fit docking.
    Nabuurs SB; Wagener M; de Vlieg J
    J Med Chem; 2007 Dec; 50(26):6507-18. PubMed ID: 18031000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
    Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Incorporating backbone flexibility in MedusaDock improves ligand-binding pose prediction in the CSAR2011 docking benchmark.
    Ding F; Dokholyan NV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Aug; 53(8):1871-9. PubMed ID: 23237273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. GalaxyDock: protein-ligand docking with flexible protein side-chains.
    Shin WH; Seok C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Dec; 52(12):3225-32. PubMed ID: 23198780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Fast docking using the CHARMM force field with EADock DSS.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    J Comput Chem; 2011 Jul; 32(10):2149-59. PubMed ID: 21541955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. MOLS 2.0: software package for peptide modeling and protein-ligand docking.
    Paul DS; Gautham N
    J Mol Model; 2016 Oct; 22(10):239. PubMed ID: 27638416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
    Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. S4MPLE--sampler for multiple protein-ligand entities: simultaneous docking of several entities.
    Hoffer L; Horvath D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Jan; 53(1):88-102. PubMed ID: 23215156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DINC 2.0: A New Protein-Peptide Docking Webserver Using an Incremental Approach.
    Antunes DA; Moll M; Devaurs D; Jackson KR; Lizée G; Kavraki LE
    Cancer Res; 2017 Nov; 77(21):e55-e57. PubMed ID: 29092940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Search strategies and evaluation in protein-protein docking: principles, advances and challenges.
    Huang SY
    Drug Discov Today; 2014 Aug; 19(8):1081-96. PubMed ID: 24594385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling loop backbone flexibility in receptor-ligand docking simulations.
    Flick J; Tristram F; Wenzel W
    J Comput Chem; 2012 Dec; 33(31):2504-15. PubMed ID: 22886372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Solvent structure improves docking prediction in lectin-carbohydrate complexes.
    Gauto DF; Petruk AA; Modenutti CP; Blanco JI; Di Lella S; Martí MA
    Glycobiology; 2013 Feb; 23(2):241-58. PubMed ID: 23089616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic and efficient side chain optimization for molecular docking using a cheapest-path procedure.
    Schumann M; Armen RS
    J Comput Chem; 2013 May; 34(14):1258-69. PubMed ID: 23420703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Essential considerations for using protein-ligand structures in drug discovery.
    Warren GL; Do TD; Kelley BP; Nicholls A; Warren SD
    Drug Discov Today; 2012 Dec; 17(23-24):1270-81. PubMed ID: 22728777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on an updated benchmark: 2. Evaluation methods and general results.
    Li Y; Han L; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Jun; 54(6):1717-36. PubMed ID: 24708446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Random drift particle swarm optimisation algorithm for highly flexible protein-ligand docking.
    Fu Y; Chen Z; Sun J
    J Theor Biol; 2018 Nov; 457():180-189. PubMed ID: 30170044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting protein-ligand binding modes for CELPP and GC3: workflows and insight.
    Xu X; Ma Z; Duan R; Zou X
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Mar; 33(3):367-374. PubMed ID: 30689079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.